I'm so glad you sourced us a completely unbiased website such as creation.com.
LOL
The better question is why aren't you ignoring him?
I'm trying, really I am. It's like a train crash, you don't want to look, but you just can't seem to turn your head away.
Remember "The Dank Show"?
Now it's "The BADecker Show".
Don't feel too bad about it. I think the reason people keep engaging BADecker is because they actually care to try to prevent someone continuing on such a profoundly deluded path. This differs drastically from BADecker who doesn't seem to care one way or another whether someone believes in the truth or if he/she might go to hell. He's just gleeful from thinking he's right, and that's about it.
I really wonder though, how many Christians and theists would need to tell BADecker he's delusional in order for him to start wondering whether he's wrong?
Now, now, jointy, baby. The fact that you, a knowledgeable proponent of good logic, joins in the character assassinations, simply proves that you are not as knowledgeable as you suggest.
If the dictionary definitions were not there, and if there was no corroboration from others (websites), perhaps I would be delusional. But now, since you are joining in attack against the truth of atheism being religion, in the face of all the evidence that it IS religion, you are discrediting yourself.
Wake up and see that the largest reason that atheists hate religion is that they don't want religion to exist, but that they realize in their hearts that the more they fight for this, the more they turn atheism into a religion. It's in the definitions of the words, and the fact that nature highly suggests that there is a God.