Topic: Why do Atheists Hate Religion? - page 417. (Read 901520 times)
i think atheist are just people who do not like to be controlled or have the feeling to believe in a deity or any Godliness. but i would like to ask to an atheist what happens after death?
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. The gift of rational thought is perverted and usurped by superstitious brainwashing during the formative years of very nearly all religious adults.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
This can be true for members of any religion. But while it is not necessarily true of all the members of every religion, it is mostly true for members of the atheism religion. Why? Because the evidence for the existence of God is overwhelming, as shown here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.
Honestly, I don't even know why you keep pushing the "atheism is a religion" point. It says nothing about Christianity whatsoever, and really doesn't mean much of anything.
What I can tell you is that the reason why we keep pushing back against such an unimportant point is that the reasoning by which you arrive at this point infiltrates all other conclusions that you create. That is, the way in which you invent definitions on the fly, such that you have many active definitions in play at one time, only serves to make your conclusions inconsistent (via the inconsistent definitions you have in play).
You would be better off just dropping your whole "atheism is a religion" shtick, and then finding a way to re-word your beliefs in a way that's consistent with the language everyone else uses. Else, we will continue to never understand you, and what we don't understand won't make sense. And you wonder why we call your blabberings "nonsense."
Of course, how does anybody know for a fact that when you are dead, you don't know that you are dead? Has anybody come back from real death and stated such on the witness stand in court? Or is it only hearsay? Or is it only an assumption?
Until I know for a fact that when a person is dead, he/she doesn't know it, I'm not going to stupidly make that assumption.
Care to explain how making the assumption that you will live eternally is any more valid?
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. The gift of rational thought is perverted and usurped by superstitious brainwashing during the formative years of very nearly all religious adults.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
This can be true for members of any religion. But while it is not necessarily true of all the members of every religion, it is mostly true for members of the atheism religion. Why? Because the evidence for the existence of God is overwhelming, as shown here https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395.
Of course, how does anybody know for a fact that when you are dead, you don't know that you are dead? Has anybody come back from real death and stated such on the witness stand in court? Or is it only hearsay? Or is it only an assumption?
Until I know for a fact that when a person is dead, he/she doesn't know it, I'm not going to stupidly make that assumption.
A mind is a terrible thing to waste. The gift of rational thought is perverted and usurped by superstitious brainwashing during the formative years of very nearly all religious adults.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
Some linguistic anthropologists regard religion as a language virus, which short circuits the critical thinking pathways in our brains. The gift of primate brain plasticity can also be a curse, when barbaric Mother Nation Culture ignorantly tinkers with nature.
True Detective - Rust talks about Religion
If you love reason, it follows that you must despise its enemies, violence and its ally superstition.
BTW, I never answered this.
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Quote
Why do Atheists hate Religion ?
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Every last one of them, right? Well, you might as well leave after a statement like that.
Cow : Pie :: BADecker : Religion
You're so cute. Thanks for getting down to earth.
BTW, I never answered this.
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Quote
Why do Atheists hate Religion ?
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Every last one of them, right? Well, you might as well leave after a statement like that.
Cow : Pie :: BADecker : Religion
BTW, I never answered this.
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Quote
Why do Atheists hate Religion ?
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Every last one of them, right? Well, you might as well leave after a statement like that.
BTW, I never answered this.
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Quote
Why do Atheists hate Religion ?
The answer is that they do not, it is the other way around. Actually most atheists I know feel very sad for those that feel they must conform to some doctrine in order to have a better life than the one they currently have. I see there point.
Last post, thread is a waste of time.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
No restrictions this end.
So, what answer does your religion give you?
Nothing, because I don't use your twisted warped definition of the word religion that changes daily to suit the situation.
Since you have access to dictionaries just like most other people, your answer to the question, "nothing," simply means that you can't even hear yourself think. You are the most capable vegetable I have ever seen.
Vegetable today, perhaps tomorrow you'll change some word definition around so I won't be. Fingers crossed.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
No restrictions this end.
So, what answer does your religion give you?
Nothing, because I don't use your twisted warped definition of the word religion that changes daily to suit the situation.
Since you have access to dictionaries just like most other people, your answer to the question, "nothing," simply means that you can't even hear yourself think. You are the most capable vegetable I have ever seen.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
No restrictions this end.
So, what answer does your religion give you?
Nothing, because I don't use your twisted warped definition of the word religion that changes daily to suit the situation.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
No restrictions this end.
So, what answer does your religion give you?
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
No restrictions this end.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Ask yourself that question about your religion. The only way you won't get an answer is if your religion doesn't allow you to think.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
You apply no logic to your arguments and are either blinded by your beliefs or are just close minded. either way you are a waste of time to address.
It is illogical to accept this from you since you don't even suggest what is illogical about the things you think are my arguments.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
Does religion grant permission for it's victims to think? I'm guessing that's strictly controlled.
Poor analogy.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
Religion is most certainly not a "safety belt".
It's a hardened steel chain, designed not for the benefit of the captive.
This is true about your religion of atheism or whatever it is. It might be true about many other religions, as well. If a christian thinks this about his Christian religion, he has a lot of re-thinking to do.
You apply no logic to your arguments and are either blinded by your beliefs or are just close minded. either way you are a waste of time to address.
Jump to: