Pages:
Author

Topic: Why do people hate islam? - page 63. (Read 221036 times)

legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
December 17, 2015, 03:28:01 PM
All religion was created by man to control other men.

They are nothing more than a business selling snake oil, ever wonder why those at the top of the religious pile live like kings while the minions live in squaller?

The Catholic church alone is worth several billion, why not practice what they preach, liquidate those assets and take care of the poor.

As the old saying goes if the bible is proof of god then the comic book is proof of super heros.


I wonder what would happen if a time machine was invented and the owner offered each religious leader the opportunity to go back in time to the exact time place their chosen god/son of god was roaming around to once and for all prove or disprove their religion.  How many would have the unwavering confidence to take that opportunity.

The sooner all religion is kicked to the curb the quicker mankind can move up a step in the evolutionary ladder, and before someone spurts out the moral compass crap I would like to point out I know the difference between right and wrong unlike every religious group on the planet that has been responsible for multiple attrocities throughout history and present day.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 17, 2015, 02:30:32 PM
Quote
Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward

You are on a bitcoin forum, using a computer and using the biggest network that has ever been made. All are results of science. I understand you love the bible as much as I do, but it doesn't mean science is a step backward.




lol agree, next time you or a family member falls seriously ill dont go running to a doctor or hospital with all the latest "Modern science" equipment just drop to your knees and get god to sort it out  Grin

Many of the practices of the past produced good results. Modern science would be okay if it didn't turn the focus away from god, and direct the focus towards making money, and hide the fact that it is doing so.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2254
Merit: 1043
December 17, 2015, 01:04:55 PM
Quote
Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward

You are on a bitcoin forum, using a computer and using the biggest network that has ever been made. All are results of science. I understand you love the bible as much as I do, but it doesn't mean science is a step backward.




lol agree, next time you or a family member falls seriously ill dont go running to a doctor or hospital with all the latest "Modern science" equipment just drop to your knees and get god to sort it out  Grin
sr. member
Activity: 518
Merit: 250
December 17, 2015, 12:53:33 PM
Quote
Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward

You are on a bitcoin forum, using a computer and using the biggest network that has ever been made. All are results of science. I understand you love the bible as much as I do, but it doesn't mean science is a step backward.


legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 17, 2015, 11:06:23 AM
.....

Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. The Bible has life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward, mostly because it doesn't accept the scientific shortcuts that God gives mankind.

The end of life is to be like God, and the soul following God will be like Him.

Socrates

I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have.

Leonardo da Vinci

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

Albert Einstein

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.

Nikola Tesla

The whole science is build on these 4 people... what do you think about this? Smiley
What do I think about it?

Aside from it being wrong all the way down the line, it's totally ridiculous.
sr. member
Activity: 406
Merit: 250
December 17, 2015, 10:28:21 AM
i don't hate islam, but in my country islam dominate the minority
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 17, 2015, 09:49:27 AM

Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. The Bible has life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward, mostly because it doesn't accept the scientific shortcuts that God gives mankind.

The end of life is to be like God, and the soul following God will be like Him.

Socrates

I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have.

Leonardo da Vinci

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

Albert Einstein

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.

Nikola Tesla

The whole science is build on these 4 people... what do you think about this? Smiley

People say a lot of things.

God lives forever. Therefore the end of life is not being like God.

Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 17, 2015, 09:40:29 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate!
Granted, the following definition is very basic. None of it says anything about Christ meaning "I am the Light." Basically further, "Christ" simply means "Messiah" which means "Savior." From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/christ?s=t:
Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak,
Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?


but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!
Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.


What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not?
Okay.


Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world.
Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.


Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!
If you mean love when you say "embrace," that is definitely part of what Jesus was teaching.


One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!

I don't think that it is a requirement for you to repeat yourself. However, if you feel you must, go right ahead.

The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

I am not saying that something like improved consciousness won't happen for those who believe in Jesus and His salvation work for them. All I am saying is that the Bible doesn't talk about it that way, and improved consciousness is not the important thing even if it does happen. Faith in Jesus for salvation is the important thing. If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. The important thing is salvation.

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

Smiley

Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?

Yes, because you already told me that I didn't accept the Christ salvation, because I don't see the Bible like you did it... Smiley
What you believe doesn't depend on what I think you believe. If you think it does, you are a child. The important thing is what God KNOWS you believe. Further, I based my thinking on things that you had said. Now that you have clarified about yourself, I can think differently about you.


Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.

Did you ever try to read some books who are related whit the Bible and by a different examples to try to understand the meaning of the words in the New Testament?
I have done this. But then I stopped doing it, because I found that the Bible is self-explanatory much better than the other books that try to explain it.


Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.

Okay, please tell me your point of view about the Matrix... I would love to read it! Smiley
Well, I did that above. Why do you want to know what I think? You could have quoted the part where I explained what I think about the Matrix, but you left it out.


The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. Wink

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

You see, that is the main problem for all those who already read the Bible. Why don't try do see and think of the words that are written in the New Testament with a мodern scientific examples. Did you ever try that?

Yes. And many of the modern, scientific examples are way behind what the Bible says. So, why continue?

Modern science doesn't conclude that mankind needs a savior... at least not in what it says directly. Yet all the examples of modern science show that a savior is needed. How do they show it? They show it by modern science not being able to extend the lives of people even a little bit. In fact, modern science tends to make warfare which shortens the lives of many. Ever heard of bombs? So, the people of modern science need a savior outside of themselves. Why, therefore, consider modern science on a level with the greatness of the Jesus salvation shown in the Bible?

Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. The Bible has life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward, mostly because it doesn't accept the scientific shortcuts that God gives mankind.

Smiley

Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. The Bible has life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward, mostly because it doesn't accept the scientific shortcuts that God gives mankind.

The end of life is to be like God, and the soul following God will be like Him.

Socrates

I have offended God and mankind because my work didn't reach the quality it should have.

Leonardo da Vinci

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

Albert Einstein

The day science begins to study non-physical phenomena, it will make more progress in one decade than in all the previous centuries of its existence.

Nikola Tesla

The whole science is build on these 4 people... what do you think about this? Smiley
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 16, 2015, 12:42:30 PM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate!
Granted, the following definition is very basic. None of it says anything about Christ meaning "I am the Light." Basically further, "Christ" simply means "Messiah" which means "Savior." From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/christ?s=t:
Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak,
Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?


but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!
Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.


What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not?
Okay.


Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world.
Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.


Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!
If you mean love when you say "embrace," that is definitely part of what Jesus was teaching.


One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!

I don't think that it is a requirement for you to repeat yourself. However, if you feel you must, go right ahead.

The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

I am not saying that something like improved consciousness won't happen for those who believe in Jesus and His salvation work for them. All I am saying is that the Bible doesn't talk about it that way, and improved consciousness is not the important thing even if it does happen. Faith in Jesus for salvation is the important thing. If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. The important thing is salvation.

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

Smiley

Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?

Yes, because you already told me that I didn't accept the Christ salvation, because I don't see the Bible like you did it... Smiley
What you believe doesn't depend on what I think you believe. If you think it does, you are a child. The important thing is what God KNOWS you believe. Further, I based my thinking on things that you had said. Now that you have clarified about yourself, I can think differently about you.


Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.

Did you ever try to read some books who are related whit the Bible and by a different examples to try to understand the meaning of the words in the New Testament?
I have done this. But then I stopped doing it, because I found that the Bible is self-explanatory much better than the other books that try to explain it.


Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.

Okay, please tell me your point of view about the Matrix... I would love to read it! Smiley
Well, I did that above. Why do you want to know what I think? You could have quoted the part where I explained what I think about the Matrix, but you left it out.


The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. Wink

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

You see, that is the main problem for all those who already read the Bible. Why don't try do see and think of the words that are written in the New Testament with a мodern scientific examples. Did you ever try that?

Yes. And many of the modern, scientific examples are way behind what the Bible says. So, why continue?

Modern science doesn't conclude that mankind needs a savior... at least not in what it says directly. Yet all the examples of modern science show that a savior is needed. How do they show it? They show it by modern science not being able to extend the lives of people even a little bit. In fact, modern science tends to make warfare which shortens the lives of many. Ever heard of bombs? So, the people of modern science need a savior outside of themselves. Why, therefore, consider modern science on a level with the greatness of the Jesus salvation shown in the Bible?

Let me say it shorter. Modern science doesn't have life in it. The Bible has life in it. Who needs modern science? Modern science is a step backward, mostly because it doesn't accept the scientific shortcuts that God gives mankind.

Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 16, 2015, 08:46:17 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate!
Granted, the following definition is very basic. None of it says anything about Christ meaning "I am the Light." Basically further, "Christ" simply means "Messiah" which means "Savior." From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/christ?s=t:
Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak,
Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?


but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!
Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.


What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not?
Okay.


Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world.
Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.


Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!
If you mean love when you say "embrace," that is definitely part of what Jesus was teaching.


One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!

I don't think that it is a requirement for you to repeat yourself. However, if you feel you must, go right ahead.

The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

I am not saying that something like improved consciousness won't happen for those who believe in Jesus and His salvation work for them. All I am saying is that the Bible doesn't talk about it that way, and improved consciousness is not the important thing even if it does happen. Faith in Jesus for salvation is the important thing. If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. The important thing is salvation.

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

Smiley

Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?

Yes, because you already told me that I didn't accept the Christ salvation, because I don't see the Bible like you did it... Smiley

Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.

Did you ever try to read some books who are related whit the Bible and by a different examples to try to understand the meaning of the words in the New Testament?

Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.

Okay, please tell me your point of view about the Matrix... I would love to read it! Smiley

The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. Wink

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

You see, that is the main problem for all those who already read the Bible. Why don't try do see and think of the words that are written in the New Testament with a мodern scientific examples. Did you ever try that?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 15, 2015, 01:26:52 PM
It's not specifically Islam, some people hate all religions, some people hate only other religions, some people don't care about religions at all. The problem is if government decides to manage whole country by religious views people don't like this treatment. We should fight with these politicians.

Right. Some people hate themselves because they have a self-religion of hate of religion.

 Cheesy
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 500
December 15, 2015, 01:06:20 PM
It's not specifically Islam, some people hate all religions, some people hate only other religions, some people don't care about religions at all. The problem is if government decides to manage whole country by religious views people don't like this treatment. We should fight with these politicians.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 15, 2015, 12:53:25 PM
....

The bolded areas that PrikiNo.1 has in his post come from a different post of mine. Rather than using the "Quote" button to quote me, he simply copies, pastes and bolds pieces of my post into his post. I don't know why, but that is his way, I guess.

Smiley
Okay, that's great.  Two moldly old book freaks arguing.

Well, not really arguing. Mostly agreeing. Just saying it in different ways so that we think that we are arguing.

 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 15, 2015, 12:28:46 PM
....

The bolded areas that PrikiNo.1 has in his post come from a different post of mine. Rather than using the "Quote" button to quote me, he simply copies, pastes and bolds pieces of my post into his post. I don't know why, but that is his way, I guess.

Smiley
Okay, that's great.  Two moldly old book freaks arguing.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 15, 2015, 11:43:06 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate! Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak, but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!

What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not? Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world. Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!

One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!
So why did those must old so called "holy books" not need to bold key sentences?

The bolded areas that PrikiNo.1 has in his post come from a different post of mine. Rather than using the "Quote" button to quote me, he simply copies, pastes and bolds pieces of my post into his post. I don't know why, but that is his way, I guess.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 15, 2015, 11:37:58 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate! Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak, but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!

What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not? Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world. Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!

One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!
So why did those must old so called "holy books" not need to bold key sentences?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 15, 2015, 11:05:18 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate!
Granted, the following definition is very basic. None of it says anything about Christ meaning "I am the Light." Basically further, "Christ" simply means "Messiah" which means "Savior." From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/christ?s=t:
Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak,
Does it matter if someone thinks that you believe what you speak or not?


but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!
Well, thanks. However, as I pointed out above, the dictionary has the meanings. There are all kinds of Bible dictionaries and the Bible itself. But, thanks for your efforts... I think.


What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not?
Okay.


Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world.
Good movie, right? But there wasn't really anything about the difference between the material world and the spiritual world in it. And even if there was, that wasn't the point of the movie.


Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!
If you mean love when you say "embrace," that is definitely part of what Jesus was teaching.


One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!

I don't think that it is a requirement for you to repeat yourself. However, if you feel you must, go right ahead.

The Bible doesn't talk about reaching a higher level of consciousness by believing Jesus, or by believing in Jesus. That is what someone else is trying to suggest that the Bible means.

I am not saying that something like improved consciousness won't happen for those who believe in Jesus and His salvation work for them. All I am saying is that the Bible doesn't talk about it that way, and improved consciousness is not the important thing even if it does happen. Faith in Jesus for salvation is the important thing. If higher consciousness is attached to that somehow, great. The important thing is salvation.

Let me say one other thing. Even if a higher level of consciousness, or some form of improved consciousness, is what Jesus salvation is all about, since the Bible doesn't say it that way, it is unnecessary to consider it that way.

Smiley
member
Activity: 98
Merit: 10
December 15, 2015, 10:20:15 AM
There are a lot of people who speak about the light without talking about Christ. You have asked me two questions here. Yet you have not said that you accept Jesus salvation as the Bible states it. You keep on wanting teasing me with questions while not making a statement.

Besides, the admonition was really rhetorical, anyway, regarding you personally.


I am the Light and Christ is the same meaning mate! Sometimes I mix my words and maybe that's why people think that I don't accept the same thing that I speak, but don't worry I am able to solve that problem when someone ask me. Smiley All I am trying to tell you is the meaning behind the words of Christ and his Apostles!

What is a level of consciousness? Why would one want to be more conscious that he is when he is conscious? If there is something in the idea of being conscious that you like, then go for it.

Why not? Well, I definitely suggest you to watch the Matrix and try to find the difference between the material and the spiritual world. Christ was trying to teach is in His words, that we need to stop loving this world and embrace each other!

One does not need a special level of consciousness to believe in Jesus salvation.

Oh my God... Did I must repeat my self again? - Jesus Christ was that High level of consciousness, His words, acts, and miracles. He was telling us that we able to that only if we believe in HIM!
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 13, 2015, 05:01:45 PM

Do you really think you need to make excuses for yourself to me?    Cheesy

From http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/atheist?s=t:
Quote
atheist
[ey-thee-ist]

noun
1. a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.

Everything you said following this was based upon either deliberately or accidentally ignoring that which has been highlighted.

Here's one for you :

Quote
A straw man is a common form of argument and is an informal fallacy based on giving the impression of refuting an opponent's argument, while actually refuting an argument which was not advanced by that opponent.[1]

The so-called typical "attacking a straw man" argument creates the illusion of having completely refuted or defeated an opponent's proposition by covertly replacing it with a different proposition (i.e., "stand up a straw man") and then to refute or defeat that false argument ("knock down a straw man") instead of the original proposition.[2][3]

This technique has been used throughout history in polemical debate, particularly in arguments about highly charged emotional issues where a fiery, entertaining "battle" and the defeat of an "enemy" may be more valued than critical thinking or understanding both sides of the issue.



Not sure what you are getting at.

Disbelieving something is simply a stronger way to say it that to say believing it is not.

For example, in law, if there is a void judgement, one would not say, "the judgment is void." To say, "the judgment is void" is to at least suggest that there was a judgment. If it is said like, "the void judgment," there is denial that the judgment even existed.

Call it what you will, or attempt to believe or disbelieve what you will, the fact is that there is scientific proof that God exists. Someday, this proof may be overturned. There are reasonable theories that are almost doing it right now by becoming proof. Until they come out of the theory stage, God exists.

In the face of proof, disbelieving is a religion... especially if it is expressed with evermore firmly understood and repeated dogma.

Smiley

As a layman, I'm pretty well informed, and have not seen this so-called proof. I've seen a lot of bunk science from "young earth creationists". So, gimme links. As always, I'm willing to consider other points of view.
Right in this thread at:
snip

Proof for God lies in the combining of 3 things:
1. Action and reaction (cause and effect), Newton's 3rd Law;
2. The fact of a complex universe, including all things therein;
3. Standard, simple entropy, which doesn't include all the latest theoretical stuff about entropy.

snip


However, what I was getting at, very specifically, is that you used the modern definition of atheist (which I accept) to make an argument and refute it. That argument was predicated on NOT ACKNOWLEDGING that part of that definition is a simple disbelief, not a dogmatic "there is no god". I work from the "the proofs are insufficient for such a bold claim" ideation. One cannot disprove a negative.
Thank you for extending the explanation of your dogma regarding your religion of non-religion.


I will state, AGAIN, that if there IS an all powerful deity, it doesn't care to be worshipped. This, too, is based on logic. If there is an all powerful deity, and it wishes to be worshipped, there could only possibly be ONE religion. Because if the deity is all powerful, it can EASILY make it's wishes known, and if it wishes to be worshipped, it would do so. The fact that there in existence literally thousands of ideations of "gods" proves beyond any reasonable doubt that they are all false.
Now you who don't want to believe that there is an all powerful Deity are trying to dictate what such a Deity would be like? How silly!

Even if God were not all powerful, He is so far beyond anything that we can imagine, that there is no way to limit Him by our tiny logic. I mean, do you have the understanding of how He rolled out the heavens? Do you have any clue whatsoever about how He made cause and effect to operate for thousands of years so that it produces the intelligence of people today? Come on! Give yourself a break!


This of course does not directly address the question of whether or not there are gods. Because if there are, they are hiding their existence, and have structured the universe in such a way that it CAN BE understood based solely on observed phenomena, and those observed phenomena generally have a less fantastical explanation than "god did it".
Rather, it is people like you who are attempting to hide the existence of God.

Look, again, at the proof for God listed above, and if it isn't quite enough proof for you, it is such strong evidence that it outweighs all the evidence that God doesn't exist, a million+ times over.


The understanding of the physical universe at the times of the writings of the various "holy books" was, to put it politely, dismal. That they got a few things right with almost no rigor is nothing short of amazing, but it does not make the overall paradigm work. Most of it does not. For instance, most "learned" men at the time of the writings of the New Testament still believed the earth to be held up by four pillars on the back of a turtle, and that the stars were holes in something called the "firmament". Better understanding via observation and testing (the beginnings of what has been formalized as the scientific method) proved beyond any doubt that this widely held ideation was just plain wrong. With every advance in scientific knowledge, the "god did it" argument got pushed further into the background until there was only a small amount of gaps. Which the religious seize on like a drowning man will grab a stick.
However, in light of the fact that today many people want to believe that a supremely evident God doesn't exist, people have only gotten worse regarding how dismal they are in their understanding of the universe.


disbelief is NOT a system of belief. Skepticism, however, is. I am a skeptic. On damn near everything. I hold to Mark Twain's observation that Faith is the belief in what you know ain't so.
Disbelief is simply the other side of believing that there is not. They are essentially the same at their root and core.


When it comes to Christianity, it is so self contradictory within it's own books, leaving alone the sects, that it cannot possibly be inspired by an all powerful deity.
Quite the contrary. The Bible is not at all contradictory.


Unless, of course, that deity is completely mad. I suppose that's possible, but hardly cause for admiration or worship. You cannot, for instance, simultaneously condemn and command murder. Yet the bible does so, and that's peripheral. The PRIMARY DOCTRINE of christianity is that it's perfectly legit to kill an innocent man to "atone" for the crimes of the guilty. Try that one in a courtroom some day.
The Bible does not command murder. The Bible is a record. At times within that record, it will be found that the government (ancient Israel) was commanded, by God, to execute peoples and nations for doing evil. That is one of the jobs of governments. They exist to at times execute those who deserve to die, just to keep the peace.


Further, within the Christian scriptures it says that churches and places of worship are vain, as god cannot be seen or heard in such places. Rather, and this one isn't a paraphrase, "The Kingdom of God is within you". Yet a very pious group of men who made that connection were hunted down, forced into a mountain retreat, besiged, and killed at Montsegur in 1284 by other very pious men. Both sides were utterly convinced that they were right. This is the sort of crap that strong religious belief breeds. Divisions that need not exist, and in many cases throughout history have led to bloodshed on a massive scale.
Christian people are people. Just because they are Christian, doesn't mean that they are suddenly perfect. It means that they are blessed with the knowledge of salvation to everlasting life... even though we (the Christians) must go through death in this life to gain eternal life in the resurrection.

If you look at the known history of the world, you will find many non-Christian peoples and nations that were far worse than Christians. Consider Genghis Khan, for example. And think of Stalin who wasn't a Christian, and he killed at least 30 million, and maybe 3 times that number.

God is not the author of wickedness or evil. People are, by following the devil, Satan.


That Islam is now convulsing in the same way is not surprising. Organized religion, regardless of it's pantheon, is based upon control of the masses. It will fight for that control at ANY cost, conceding only when not doing so would utterly destroy the organization. Christianity reached that point about 150 years ago. If the timeline remains similar, that means Islam has about 550 years before they stop believing it ok to kill for the faith. Given modern communication, I suspect it won't take that long.

The difference is, there are no Christian directives from God for violence. The directives in the New Testament (from whence Christianity flows) are literally peace for all people. Yet the Islamic directives for violence in the Islamic writings are many. Islam is of its false god, Satan. Christianity is of God over all.

You are badly mistaken. However, if you will change your understanding to the truth, God is willing to forgive even you for your struggling against Him.

Smiley
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 13, 2015, 04:27:37 PM
Does any Muslim wish to compare FACTS about the Inquisition with FACTS about violent Islam?
Two months of Jihad, matches the toll in death of a hundred and forty years of the very worst of Christianity's oppressive eras.

Islam and Christianity are very similar. At least they used to be very similar until the 19th century. .....

Oh.  So they ARE NOT SIMILAR AT ALL....

Thanks.

In practice they are not similar. Compare Saudi Arabia or Iran with the United States.

Interesting. You know that's a refutation of Brian's assertion they "used to be very similar until the 19th century."

Similar vast gaps in the cultures have been noted historically.
Pages:
Jump to: