Topic: Why do you still want to play fake web2 casinos? Why we choose web3 casinos (Read 1119 times)

Yes, indeed, web3 casinos still need time to be launched, but it seems that there are already web3 casinos already operating and promoting their casinos. It may be the newest concept of crypto casino to attract more users, but if there are no advantages offered, it seems it will be the same as web3 casino. And if, in the future web3 casino is the same as web2 casino, likely, users will still play at web2 casino because they have found the casino that suits them.

Those definitely are potential issues related to web3 casinos, and on top of that, one more disadvantage of web3 casinos is that you don't have the option of using a lot of different cryptocurrencies for betting, there can hardly be about 2 or 3 coins that you can use for on-chain betting which might stop a lot of people from using a web3 casino platform because every user has a different preference when it comes to cryptocurrencies used for gambling.

And KYC won't really be an advantage in the future because authorities are already looking for ways to start regulating decentralized platforms and if that happens, these casinos along with decentralized exchanges will all be regulated and work under licenses, and then they will be compelled to ask their users to complete KYC verification.

Web3 casino games will take time to get everything up and running because it's new. Web2 evolved due to the huge demand for easy access to casino games, which enabled users to consume and create their own content but also greatly aided casino gaming. Now, this web of the future known as Web3 has emerged as a new concept. The latest iteration of Web2 will only allow users to consume and create content and data. And although gambling platforms have strict rules, it is possible to use and gain access.

When the time that web3 succeed to take over the scene and web2 will be outdated for sure those reputable casino will shift to web3. And they can gain more hype for their casino for adopting the changes so most provably that their current costumers will stay then continue to play those games together with the promotions they can offer.

If we talk about right now maybe people have doubts about those new web3 casino since reputation is more important rather those new implementation that's one of the reason why we see those reputable casino still using web2 since they didn't find any pressure to rush all things since they are still doing fine with current one.

I doubt that because we know that the government can pressure any business that hasn't asked its users to do KYC. So if the web3 casino hasn't asked its users to do KYC, it's only a matter of time and could happen anytime. The transaction will likely experience a bottleneck when there is a wave of transactions made by many users due to momentary panic and that has happened before.

People may still play at web2 casinos because they already feel they know the casino more closely and don't find any difficulties. That's why they still use web2 casino to play gambling and are not asked to do KYC by the casino.

The only advantage I can see for a web3 casino would be the NO KYC aspect. Gamblers who value their privacy might want to consider this option. I have never used a web3 casino but if you are betting on-chain directly I can potentially see issues with it being to slow and expensive. Even layer 2 blockchains can have high fees and face congestion which don't make it ideal for really small transactions. If a popular casino like Stake moved their entire userbase to an on-chain casino, that blockchain would slow to a crawl and fees would skyrocket. I wouldn't want to make a $5 bet and end up having to wait hours for a confirmation and pay $10 in gas fees.

Web3-based casino sites cannot if they have to compete with ordinary crypto casinos in general because from time to time since the emergence of web3 there have been some problems regarding the regulations and also how they work, although not all web3 casinos have problems but in reality most gamblers still don't trust for web casino3.
Some web3 casinos can't even provide services like they should be on the web3 base, so it's only natural that gamblers still have doubts about playing there.
Decentralized is just a phrase that they include when promoting, but in fact, when we research in detail, decentralization cannot be found correctly.

Till now I don't understand what a web3 casino means!
What's the difference between a web3, as you say, and a web 3 casino?
The only difference that I have noticed that on a web3 casino you can register with your web3 wallet. What are the other differences? Can any one explain to us what is a web3 casino? From there, we can discuss why we prefer web3 or web2 casinos.

very well-said. if the regular crypto casinos like stake is not to be trusted, then they won't get high number of players who are as well high rollers. these seemingly web 3 casinos should just accept the competition in this market. and a lot of gamblers are still opting for regular crypto casinos where they can see the gambling license at a glance and can easily reach out the customer service. and besides, most casinos claiming to be web 3.0 are not really web 3.0 but as they are not totally decentralised in nature.

Well, I think we all want to play in casinos, it doesn't matter if they are web 2, web 3, the important thing is to have a good experience, because I personally like to play and that I can have the freedom. doing what I like the most, withdrawing, depositing, all this is under a great responsibility as it is to play with Intelligence.

Web3 casinos do have something that can benefit players because I think that's the only way players would leave land-based casinos and go away because everyone is going to make money, I don't think they just go there for fun, fun is a complement, but we all know that when we enter a casino our greatest illusion is to win, having a good time is something that we give ourselves when we win, but in general terms it is a game that lends itself to adult fun, because you have to be responsible when spending the money that is budgeted for the casino, without danger of falling into addictions.

As I said before, there are many people who don't really know what a web3 casino is, and they expect a lot from them, but what really matters is that the casino is reliable, honest, and that they actually do things well so that People win or lose, be fair, that's all.

What I have said, the things that occur with web 3 casinos or something like that are always another way of seeing things, the Traditional casinos are the ones that I trust the most, I don't see any other way to trust more, I have not seen the web3 casinos seen a lot of relevance , just the fact that it is called a web 3 casino is what draws players attention , and I am very sure that many do not even know what a web 3 casino means , taking these things into consideration it is normal that things can be go another way , or who want to see it as the Ultimate or as Something that can be above web2 casinos , or Traditional casinos.

For many Players , it is necessary to clarify that they should be very careful , it is not Known that there are casinos that are eb23 there and they fall for nothing and cheat , scam , that is the care that must be taken.

It seems to me web3 casinos and their supporters are trying to make them out to be something they are not, they are trying to appear as if they are the only good casinos out there by trying to defame other casinos by saying they are not to be trusted.

But this is a lie, whether a casino can be trusted or not depends on how high is reputation they have obtained until that point on time and how willing is the casino to try to keep that reputation, anything else is secondary, including whether the casino is fully decentralized or not.

I would add that the biggest difference between searching for information to know whether a casino is a shady one or a scam, is the fact that the so called web-2 casinos (traditional ones) have access to centralized registrations with the government and other politici authorities. There is some kind of regulation which could provide confidence to gamblers.

On the other hand, the so called web-3 casinos still lack of any kind of certification, beyond providing the source code of their service, and yet not everyone can read it to verify the integrity of the service.

In order to verify a tradicional casino, it only takes a couple of hours at most, with Web3 one needs to have more knowledge on coding or trust someone who does.

Web3 is basically the integration of blockchain and cryptocurrency systems to any platforms brother. Casinos which built from a project of cryptocurrencies are mostly web3 in which those have their own coins or token to play in exchange for Fiat. For Web2, you can say that these are traditionally made within the scope of its transactions.

Realistically, with new popping websites, regardless if it is web2 or web3 based, it's very difficult to determine which one is a fraud, and which one is reliable. Most need intensive research.

Aren't there terms like positive publicity and negative publicity? Publicity that is positive should be good for a business where people use their money but negative publicity can go wrong with such businesses because they might catch the attention of the audience but the audience will not really prefer them for their services because they know how negative they have been, and this is exactly what's happening here, calling your rivals bad only so that you look good.

Web2 casinos will never be affected by this because they have already created their place within the gambling community and people know that they are not fake since they've been using them for years, web3 is a very new concept and it will take time for it to take it's place within the industry.

Companies have always smeared their rivals. Justbet's representative's assertion that all web2 casinos are "fake and unfair" is ridiculous. Web2 casinos, like web3, differ in fairness, transparency, and user experience. Blockchain's openness might make web3 casinos the next big thing. claiming they'll be better is like claiming books are better than movies - its subjective and depends on implementation. Its possible this topic is a marketing gimmick. You're right: stirring the pot can draw traffic regardless of the conversation's tone. Its another matter whether its good for business. Isnt all publicity good? Is it?

Yeah, those are fake casinos that claim they are web3 platforms, but in reality, they are not. The question is how an average Joe will know that a specific casino is not using web3 technology? I don't know much about the web3 platform because I have rarely used any web3 platform so far. If a casino try to scam, they can do it no matter if it's web2 or web3.

Web2 casinos on the market for a long time now. Yes, there are some scam casinos around. You have to stay away from them. That does not mean all web2 casinos are scams. Beware of phishing too.

First of all, we need to realize that Web 2 casinos are not fake. They have been in existence for decades and even now they are more popular than the Web 3.0 casino. The fake ones are only those who are Web 2.0 casinos but they market themselves as Web 3.0 casino. These casinos should be avoided because if you speak the wrong things in your marketing campaign, that business can't be trusted for honesty and transparency.

Other than this, Web 2.0 casinos are fine and good to play and let the Web 3.0 casino market gets mature.

Even though they use the same technology, look at the title written by the justbet casino representative. They claim that web2 casinos are fake and unfair, while they claim that web3 casinos are better than them. I also think there will be more web3 casinos in the future. New platforms will learn from old casino mistakes. We might see more improved platforms in the future.

I believe this thread is part of their marketing strategy. They want bitcoin talk users to talk about their platform. No matter if it's positive or negative. They will get some traffic from this topic. But, i don't think such marketing strategies are good for business.

Whatever casinos use web2 and web3, even though it has to be decentralized, I'm sure to prevent fraud and cheating by players in taking advantage of promotions, especially bonuses at casinos, namely by asking their users for KYC, web3 also doesn't encourage people to play independently without strict regulations, let alone free from KYC. everything will look the same the rules will not change.

I believe in the future that there will be many web3 casinos too but that does not mean that they are free from KYC regulations as well because that is to prevent other criminal acts including money laundering, I have never differentiated between the two because they are the same technology that we admit too, I have also been worried about connecting the wallet to an untrusted website, but I use another solution, which is to use a backup wallet to connect to the web3 casino and if I get money from the backup wallet then I will send money to my personal main wallet.

Right now both forces, centralization and decentralization, are fighting each other, governments are pushing for a massive amount of centralization, and as a response to such a push decentralized options have appeared.

However even if there is little doubt the forces of centralization are stronger, at the same time it is not as if governments can completely subdue this market, and if given enough time then we may get to the point in which the decentralized options we have available will increase, allowing us once again to those which value our privacy to retain it.