Topic: Why do you still want to play fake web2 casinos? Why we choose web3 casinos - page 2. (Read 1119 times)

It's just one of the solutions that you can use to avoid fraud or bad things so that you will be calm when connecting your personal wallet to the web3 casino. But if you think it's a waste of time, you can still play at web2 or web3 casinos using your usual login email and password. Indeed, there are not many platforms available yet, but maybe there will be more platforms in the future where web2 casinos will tighten the rules so that gamblers want to avoid verifying their identity.

It's not hard to create another wallet for this purpose only. But, Maintaining a couple of wallets and sending money from one to another every time I play is a waste of time, to be honest. But it could pay off if I get something special from web3 casinos. I asked myself what I would get from web3 casinos? There are not too many platforms available yet. I am unable to choose which one is the best.

I haven't seen any web3 casinos with 3rd party games and with a license. So, it's unlikely that they may ask for a KYC without having 3rd party games and a gambling license. I've checked justbet and there are TOS, Privacy policy or anything related to these info. They don't have 3rd party games and they don't have a Live support to contact if you encounter any issues. So, why I would try them?

I think you can create a new wallet that you specifically use for gambling and don't have your saved coins, so you don't have to worry if your coins are hacked later. I usually do that if I want to connect to a website that can use the connection from my personal wallet, I have had no problems so far. But it's okay if you are afraid to connect to such websites, and I agree not to risk it.

Web3 casinos that do not require KYC on their customers may apply if there is pressure from regulators to require their users to verify their gambling accounts. And it has happened to web2 casinos where many crypto gamblers use big money to gamble. Hopefully, these casinos, be they web2 or web3 casinos, will not be too strict regarding KYC so that we can still play gambling comfortably without verifying our gambling account.

We have to pay attention to that and look for casinos that still allow us to gamble anonymously so we don't have to worry about KYC. One of the steps we can take is to limit the amount of money we can gamble and not even big money because that could raise suspicions for the casino to look into it. Anonymous gambling may not exist in the future, although there may still be some casinos that do not want to comply with the regulations of the regulator. We know that the regulator can act easily to ask the casinos to apply KYC to their members.

On one hand, we have the 'traditional' digital gambling platforms that have gradually adopted stricter KYC protocols. On the other, we have the emerging decentralized casinos, their appeal being the promise of pseudonymity. However, this too is threatened by the implementation of KYC. Is it possible that we might be chasing an illusion? The notion of unrestricted, anonymous gambling might be a tempting concept, but isn't it fundamentally at odds with the regulatory nature of our societies? The growth of Web3 casinos might well be inevitable, but a key point to remember is this: the protocols and regulations of a system are not just a feature of the technology, they reflect the wider socio-political context in which the technology operates. If Web3 casinos are to operate within the framework of existing laws, KYC seems an unavoidable reality.

If web3 casinos also get a license and integrate 3rd party games, they may also ask for KYC. Some providers need information about players when they see suspicious activity on their game, they may ask for a KYC and web3 casinos will be forced to ask for KYC from players. I did not play in web3 casinos yet because I don't think there is any reliable web3 casino developed yet.

Moreover, I am afraid of connecting my wallet to any website. This is another reason I also don't use new unnamed Decentralized exchanges. If any web3 casino can build their reputation and their name in the future, I won't mind playing there.

But what if the web3 casino is also required to do KYC, as is already the case with the web2 casino? Do you still choose that casino to gamble? What concerns us here is KYC which has begun to be enforced in web2 and web3 casinos so that many crypto gamblers think that now they are restricted to gambling with crypto anonymously.

But I think that the web3 casino still needs further development to get to the liking of the gambling industry, and it will also take time to get there. And if web3 casino manages to develop it according to gambling industry standards, I think web3 casino can compete with web2 casino. And as long as web3 casinos don't require their users to do KYC, I suspect gamblers will move to web3 casinos, especially when web2 casinos already implement KYC more strictly than now.

It definitely matters. If web3 is done right, the mechanisms that provide provably fair games is open source, and the funds available for deposits and withdrawals should be viewable at all times due to being operated by smart contract, which also removes chances of embezzlement and fraud.

I will agree that there is still progression to be made to make web3 standard across the board, as well as it being possible for Bitcoin and other coins. That doesn't mean that there is no difference between web2 & web3 though.

I also think that web2 or web3 does not matter. As long as they provide fair games and fair technology with instant deposits and withdrawals, I choose the platform to gamble (even though I am not a regular gambler). My point was this it is not the right marketing strategy to blame another type of casino for getting attention and turning their players into your players.

Web3 platform has a long way to go. Most of the web3 casinos do not have enough variety of games that can attract players to them. Yet they blame other platforms for not being fair while they choose to ignore providing any kind of evidence.

Well, whether it is web 2 or web 3 is not the thing, what really matters is that the casino is honest and advanced, that it has new functions that adapt to all types of players, not just specific ones, I have Given that many people support web3 casinos, which I do not see as much relevance, I think that a person who plays should be respected that they have their money in the casino and that they do not put any type of inconvenience when they go to make withdrawals, that they can have their money easily, this is how the efficiency of a casino is measured , which can be seen clearly well.

Many times I have Seen that some highlight the network under which a casino can be the best , the speed, the Security , I don't know if they remember it, but when the NFT games were in full swing they said that the metaverses would Soon Come , and the best network for these was Polygon, because the binance network was very congested, the network rates had increased enormously and yes, it was very true, at the last they were accepting minimum deposits of 100 usd so that they could be carried out with total comfort , but the Players no longer wanted the Binance network, and of Course it was Because of the Prices , that was Something that was always going to be Evidenced.

Arbitrum network on which just.bet runs on is a fast blockchain, you can make your transactions nearly instant by going 'aggressive' setting in metamask. Despite this, I wouldn't use this casino because even the cents as gas fees add up and become good amount one day.

Any web3 casino where you are required to pay gas fee is useless imo. However, web3 casino on fee-less blockchain is better than web2 casinos due to security it would provide to your funds but here or any other platform which requires gas fee for each task to perform, it's not so.

We may not like it but it is quite likely that a promotion like that can very effective, just look at what happens with politicians during an election, in which they make all kind of claims as long as they think they can get an edge over their political rivals.

And very often if there is at least some truth to it then they will win a lot of votes and increase their chances of winning their election, so it is not surprising now we are seeing casinos engaging in the same kind of negative campaign against its competitors.

Some web3 casinos can be untrustworthy as well. OP claims that Web 2 casinos are unfair and Web 3 casinos are fair. I've repeatedly asked to back his claims by submitting any proof they might have. They decided to ignore my questions, and this thread is still up for a new discussion. we often see scam accusations that some fake website drained Metamask wallet or another wallet once they connected with some website.

There is no guarantee that web3 casinos won't do that if they have something bad in their mind. Once we deposit some amount on a web2 casino, we cannot lose more than what we deposited. But a web3 casino can drain your wallet that you connected to their website.

That's probably right, I think they could be way better off if they had gone to promoting their service without having to do this and calling web2 or centralized casinos fake or having disadvantages and stuff, we all know how the industry is or has been, web3 platforms are too new for us but we have been using centralized exchanges for years now, we would obviously not like it if someone comes accusing them only so that we use their services.

I've actually seen a lot of people and companies doing this thing and I don't understand why they think this can be an effective marketing strategy when it's actually not, it's so dumb to think that they will get the customers of another company by accusing them and praising themselves.

There are basically no deposits and withdrawals in web3 casinos because everything is done on-chain, you connect your wallet with the casino and use your wallet balance directly to place bets, if you win, winnings are added to your wallet balance and if you lose, the bet amount is deducted from your wallet balance, that is how a true web3 or decentralized casino platform should and would operate if a platform doesn't work like that, it isn't web3 at all.

You are right that most people prefer going to casinos where they feel comfortable and safe with everything including their balance, customer support, the games they play, and anything that is important for someone as a gambler, and web2 casinos have been around for quite some time now, so they are trusted as well.

They just hype web3 to be good but actually it really doesn't matter at all. Because the gameplay is the same and there's actually no big changes at all with this called upgrades. Casino players will always care about the fun and how trusted the casino is, maybe they will look for another technology introduce but this is actually not the main concern of everyone.

Besides that, who would want to use fake web2, no one with a normal mind would want that, right? I myself would not want to use such a stranger.


I agree with what you said that there is absolutely no guarantee that web3 or web2 will be provided to gamblers in any casino gambling here in the crypto space. All we can really do as players is enjoy gambling, that's all.

I also think like that because I still often read news reports that corrupt officials corrupt the tax money paid to the state. That makes it inefficient because taxpayers have followed government regulations but it turns out that corrupt officials are corrupting their money. The government must eradicate this and can provide severe punishment to these corrupt officials.

If the money from the taxes can be put to good use by the government, surely the situation in that country can be more advanced because the money from the taxes is very large and can help the economy. But I don't really think about playing at web2 or web3 casinos because we have to know which casinos can provide comfort in playing gambling and these casinos must have good service for their members.

I also think that the tax authorities will find an effective way to tax any casino and web3 casinos too.  Whenever a specific person or group of people who organized a casino and run this business is known, you can find ways to tax them.  But the problematic issue is not just how to collect such taxes, but how the money collected from taxpayers would be effectively used by the government.  And this is where I think there is a problem.  And yet such money is most likely used inefficiently, and in many countries it is also partially simply stolen by corrupt officials.  By the way, web3 casinos can be used for some interesting options for reducing taxes from such a casino and at the same time with the participation of just such corrupt tax officials and other officials. 
I believe that this is what officials in some not very developed jurisdictions will do.

The government can find a way to tax all businesses because the government can look for loopholes that the government can exploit. And if things change in the future, the government can also find a way to get its taxes in both gambling and other businesses. The government can also tax web3 casinos because the government can easily pressure web3 casino owners to follow its rules. And the tax money earned will use to improve the economy. Well, let's just hope that the government people don't corrupt the tax money.

web3 casino only helps a gambler to avoid hassles in accessing the site dashboard. But web3 casino never guarantees profit to anyone and does not guarantee win. So don't see any reason to fuss over it. Web2 site is more secure in many cases as it requires a user to sign up instead of directly connecting a wallet like web3 site so no additional funds are at risked here. Gambling is a fun place where only entertainment is wise. Here web2 or web3 casino doesn't matter