Pages:
Author

Topic: Why I'm an atheist - page 41. (Read 89199 times)

sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 263
March 06, 2017, 07:20:22 AM
Reading crap is not interesting. I understand that. If there is a God show his photo. Can not picture, ask the one who communicates with God to show a miracle to live. If you can not do then do not say there is a God and you communicate with him.

Reading crap might not be interesting, but smelling it is distasteful. What are you even talking about?

Since you seem to be setting yourself up as god over God and other people, post a selfie if you want to see a picture of god. In the judgment we will see who the false god is.

God is a Spirit. He doesn't do the selfie thing like you are asking.

Cool
But if God is spirit then tell me how a spirit is able to do something. If God is immaterial how can you prove its existence. Religion is the opium of the people. They tricked him and use as slaves. so I'm an atheist.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
March 06, 2017, 05:52:32 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool

Please read the above links..... they prove that BADecker's points have been discredited. He is then shown to be delusional.

His entire "proof" is based on assumptions.... nothing more.

Thanks again for helping to strengthen the scientific knowledge in people that God exists, by not being able to refute or rebut it. And the strength is even greater because you say that there is rebuttal, without being able to show any.

Thanks, again.

Cool

I say let people read your crap and make up their own mind.

You belittle people's intelligence by telling them what you want them to believe.

There is enough rebuttal in your posts to prove your delusions.

Thanks for posting them and proving that there is no god.

Sounds absolutely like a good idea to me. Let people read and make up their own mind.

I don't care what people believe. I am simply showing them the knowledge that God exists. You are the one who is trying to keep people from understanding knowledge, by turning your false knowledge into a belief system for them.

Since you can't list any rebuttal and refutation, it doesn't exist.

Thanks again for showing us that God exists, by your insistence that science fact is a belief system.

Cool

But you do care what people believe. You continue to argue the facts and proof of nonexistence. Your actions speak of caring.

Rebuttal has been provided but you fail to accept it. That makes you a fool.

Thanks for proving that your god doesn't exist and you are only following through delusions.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 05, 2017, 02:47:31 PM
Reading crap is not interesting. I understand that. If there is a God show his photo. Can not picture, ask the one who communicates with God to show a miracle to live. If you can not do then do not say there is a God and you communicate with him.

Reading crap might not be interesting, but smelling it is distasteful. What are you even talking about?

Since you seem to be setting yourself up as god over God and other people, post a selfie if you want to see a picture of god. In the judgment we will see who the false god is.

God is a Spirit. He doesn't do the selfie thing like you are asking.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 05, 2017, 02:44:22 PM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool

Please read the above links..... they prove that BADecker's points have been discredited. He is then shown to be delusional.

His entire "proof" is based on assumptions.... nothing more.

Thanks again for helping to strengthen the scientific knowledge in people that God exists, by not being able to refute or rebut it. And the strength is even greater because you say that there is rebuttal, without being able to show any.

Thanks, again.

Cool

I say let people read your crap and make up their own mind.

You belittle people's intelligence by telling them what you want them to believe.

There is enough rebuttal in your posts to prove your delusions.

Thanks for posting them and proving that there is no god.

Sounds absolutely like a good idea to me. Let people read and make up their own mind.

I don't care what people believe. I am simply showing them the knowledge that God exists. You are the one who is trying to keep people from understanding knowledge, by turning your false knowledge into a belief system for them.

Since you can't list any rebuttal and refutation, it doesn't exist.

Thanks again for showing us that God exists, by your insistence that science fact is a belief system.

Cool
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
March 05, 2017, 10:34:25 AM
Reading crap is not interesting. I understand that. If there is a God show his photo. Can not picture, ask the one who communicates with God to show a miracle to live. If you can not do then do not say there is a God and you communicate with him.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
March 05, 2017, 07:37:02 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool

Please read the above links..... they prove that BADecker's points have been discredited. He is then shown to be delusional.

His entire "proof" is based on assumptions.... nothing more.

Thanks again for helping to strengthen the scientific knowledge in people that God exists, by not being able to refute or rebut it. And the strength is even greater because you say that there is rebuttal, without being able to show any.

Thanks, again.

Cool

I say let people read your crap and make up their own mind.

You belittle people's intelligence by telling them what you want them to believe.

There is enough rebuttal in your posts to prove your delusions.

Thanks for posting them and proving that there is no god.
sr. member
Activity: 630
Merit: 263
March 05, 2017, 05:56:59 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

Believing on God is a gamble. It is like buying a lottery ticket for one cent and the prize is 1 billion dollars.  Believing in God and doing his will  will give you salvation and eternal life. If you believe and there is no God then you will lost nothing. But if you dont believe in God and does not do his will and in the end God exists then you will lost everything.  Faith in God is a gamble that will give you the most amazing experience a human soul could ever dream of.
Show me one of the righteous. All people pretend to believe in God, but commit sin. Don't you think it's not so much faith as an attempt to deceive God if he is? There are no people worthy of heaven, and therefore I do not see the point in faith.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 05, 2017, 05:20:21 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool

Please read the above links..... they prove that BADecker's points have been discredited. He is then shown to be delusional.

His entire "proof" is based on assumptions.... nothing more.

Thanks again for helping to strengthen the scientific knowledge in people that God exists, by not being able to refute or rebut it. And the strength is even greater because you say that there is rebuttal, without being able to show any.

Thanks, again.

Cool
hero member
Activity: 994
Merit: 544
March 05, 2017, 03:18:02 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

Believing on God is a gamble. It is like buying a lottery ticket for one cent and the prize is 1 billion dollars.  Believing in God and doing his will  will give you salvation and eternal life. If you believe and there is no God then you will lost nothing. But if you dont believe in God and does not do his will and in the end God exists then you will lost everything.  Faith in God is a gamble that will give you the most amazing experience a human soul could ever dream of.
sr. member
Activity: 294
Merit: 250
March 05, 2017, 02:48:20 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool

Please read the above links..... they prove that BADecker's points have been discredited. He is then shown to be delusional.

His entire "proof" is based on assumptions.... nothing more.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 04, 2017, 02:41:19 PM
The coexistence of different scientific, moral, social and other provisions with atheism not make it an independent world, as well as the coexistence of Communist ideas in your head with blond hair on it makes blondes a political party.

Looks like English is not your first language. Perhaps the dictionaries where you come from have different meanings for some words.

Cool
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
March 04, 2017, 02:31:02 PM
The coexistence of different scientific, moral, social and other provisions with atheism not make it an independent world, as well as the coexistence of Communist ideas in your head with blond hair on it makes blondes a political party.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 04, 2017, 02:28:58 PM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.

Haven't you read:
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.10718395
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.14047133
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1662153.40
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.16803380 ?

Simple nature shows us that it is a machine. Mankind is starting to crack the machines of nature to understand how they work. The machines of mankind are so inferior to those of nature that mankind is having a hard time cracking nature. All the machines of mankind have a machine maker. Who made the machines of nature? Only something like God fits. We might have other theories about how the machines of nature came into being, but we have no evidence as strong as the machine-maker evidence.

Besides, science proves that God exists. Read the explanations of how, in the links.

Cool
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 04, 2017, 02:22:15 PM
Quote

For future reference, "alternative facts" are not the same thing as facts
Atheists have no facts to support their arguments, they cannot make a factual claim about god. Nor are they interested in evaluating the evidence that suggests rebirth and etheric beings. Atheists will claim that mind is a product of the brain but this is not a fact and has actually been dis-proven, so factually it is atheists who need to evaluate what is truly fact.

How can atheists say that they have the answer to the god-question? They do not even have an answer to the evidence suggestive of reincarnation!

52 percent of adult Americans believe that encounters with the dead are possible.
Atheists should carefully evaluate the evidence, here are 20 cases that I have not already mentioned:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Cases_Suggestive_of_Reincarnation#Published_results
and about 40 more that I keep mentioning:
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml

Another famous case: The account of James Chaffin's will is a case that truly seems suggestive of survival of the human personality after death.

Why does the OP say that awareness is an oasis between two deserts of nothingness? It is more elegant and far easier to accept as a working hypothesis that sentience exists as a potential at the source of creation, and the strongest evidence has already been put on the table: Everything to be observed in the universe implies consciousness.

If you are called to the scene of a house break-in, there is nothing stolen, there is no sign of struggle, no blood, no empty cases, and NO BODY, it would only be logical to conclude that there was no murder committed.

Th same goes for your God, there is no physical evidence to conclude otherwise.

What you think is evidence is a product of your imagination.  Not a real physical evidence.  

This is the deception of religion. They inspire people that God is a material being and has an impact on all life on earth, but as soon as it comes to evidence they say that God is immaterial and therefore to prove his existence impossible.

Atheist means believing no religion but I am an atheist and I only believe God. Wherever you turn your eyes it points to a beautiful creation which cannot have been created randomly. This must have been created by a greater being , unnatural being.


atheist
[ey-thee-ist]

1. a person who denies or disbelieves the existence of a supreme being or beings.


deny
[dih-nahy]

verb (used with object), denied, denying.
1. to state that (something declared or believed to be true) is not true:
to deny an accusation.

2. to refuse to agree or accede to:
to deny a petition.

3. to withhold the possession, use, or enjoyment of:
to deny access to secret information.

4. to withhold something from, or refuse to grant a request of:
to deny a beggar.

5. to refuse to recognize or acknowledge; disown; disavow; repudiate:
to deny one's gods.

6. to withhold (someone) from accessibility to a visitor:
The secretary denied his employer to all those without appointments.

7. Obsolete. to refuse to take or accept.

Idioms
8. deny oneself,


Quote
disbelieve
[dis-bi-leev]

verb (used with object), disbelieved, disbelieving.
1. to have no belief in; refuse or reject belief in:
to disbelieve reports of UFO sightings.
verb (used without object), disbelieved, disbelieving.

2. to refuse or reject belief; have no belief.


The point? A person doesn't have a blank opinion when it comes to something that he denies or disbelieves. Rather, he simply accepts or believes something else. There isn't any void in the thinking of a person.

Atheism is a religion.


Cool
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
March 04, 2017, 02:18:31 PM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
I don't agree with you. I see no real evidence of the existence of God. Some of the words. I believe that inside you there is faith in God, but the fact that inside you there is a God I don't believe.
legendary
Activity: 4046
Merit: 1389
March 04, 2017, 02:11:47 PM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.

A realist accepts the facts of science and nature as facts. These show and prove that God exists. Atheism is an ostrich religion.

Cool
member
Activity: 82
Merit: 10
March 04, 2017, 12:05:16 PM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
I am not convinced any statement until I personally will not see God. I have the opinion that this does not happen then I will never believe in God. That is why I am an atheist. You could even say that I'm not an atheist, but a realist.
hero member
Activity: 636
Merit: 505
March 04, 2017, 11:52:07 AM
How convenient to claim that all of these case studies are coming from my imagination! A desperate and illogical tactic that will convince no one!
member
Activity: 84
Merit: 10
March 04, 2017, 10:18:18 AM
I'm an atheist and don't believe in God. It seems to me that God is a fiction which is in the minds of people. Some kind of hypnosis. The people themselves make up their own God and believe in him, but still commit crimes.
sr. member
Activity: 448
Merit: 250
Americans do it better
March 04, 2017, 10:09:29 AM
Quote

For future reference, "alternative facts" are not the same thing as facts
Atheists have no facts to support their arguments, they cannot make a factual claim about god. Nor are they interested in evaluating the evidence that suggests rebirth and etheric beings. Atheists will claim that mind is a product of the brain but this is not a fact and has actually been dis-proven, so factually it is atheists who need to evaluate what is truly fact.

How can atheists say that they have the answer to the god-question? They do not even have an answer to the evidence suggestive of reincarnation!

52 percent of adult Americans believe that encounters with the dead are possible.
Atheists should carefully evaluate the evidence, here are 20 cases that I have not already mentioned:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Twenty_Cases_Suggestive_of_Reincarnation#Published_results
and about 40 more that I keep mentioning:
http://www.aeces.info/Top40/top40-main.shtml

Another famous case: The account of James Chaffin's will is a case that truly seems suggestive of survival of the human personality after death.

Why does the OP say that awareness is an oasis between two deserts of nothingness? It is more elegant and far easier to accept as a working hypothesis that sentience exists as a potential at the source of creation, and the strongest evidence has already been put on the table: Everything to be observed in the universe implies consciousness.

If you are called to the scene of a house break-in, there is nothing stolen, there is no sign of struggle, no blood, no empty cases, and NO BODY, it would only be logical to conclude that there was no murder committed.

Th same goes for your God, there is no physical evidence to conclude otherwise.

What you think is evidence is a product of your imagination.  Not a real physical evidence. 

This is the deception of religion. They inspire people that God is a material being and has an impact on all life on earth, but as soon as it comes to evidence they say that God is immaterial and therefore to prove his existence impossible.

Atheist means believing no religion but I am an atheist and I only believe God. Wherever you turn your eyes it points to a beautiful creation which cannot have been created randomly. This must have been created by a greater being , unnatural being.
Pages:
Jump to: