Why did nobody indict Clinton?
SNIPPED
I don’t know bud. Why did nobody indict Clinton?
Make sure you start yet another asinine thread (you’re good at that)
entitled “Why Did Nobody indict Clinton?” when you reply because
this thread topic is Trump indictment, so GTFO with your off topic outdated whataboutism spam.
Your stupidity is so humiliating to even look at.
Better than 99% of all criminal activity anywhere is never prosecuted. So, when singling out Trump for prosecution while not prosecuting the many bigger crimes of others, especially presidents and former presidents, the prosecutors, themselves, are acting criminally.
How in the world dense are you? I'm not really asking for an answer to this question. I realize that you can't begin to analyze your stupidity. My question was only rhetorical.
The Point Of No Return
https://www.zerohedge.com/political/point-no-returnThe Roman historian Suetonius described Julius Caesar as timid and noncommittal as he initially approached the Rubicon River - a shallow and narrow waterway that, at the time, demarcated the boundary between Cisalpine Gaul and Italy proper - in January 49 B.C.E.
While we cannot know for certain whether New York County, New York District Attorney Alvin Bragg's catastrophic decision to successfully indict and arraign a former president of the United States was partially attributable to an intervening apparition, we can reasonably conclude that the actions of this past week have cast a most woeful die for the trajectory of our decadent, declining republic. The 34-count formal indictment of former President Donald Trump, laughably meritless on the legal merits and scandalously imprudent on the broader political judgment, represents a genie that cannot, and will not, ever be returned to its bottle.
Much ink has already been spilled on the glaring legal deficiencies in Bragg's case, which ought to be evident to any competent first-year law student and which had led Bragg's predecessor Cyrus Vance Jr., U.S. prosecutors and—in the not-so-distant past—Bragg himself to eschew prosecution. The underlying New York State crime that Trump allegedly violated and which is the exclusive crime invoked in the formal indictment, falsifying business records in the first degree, has a two-year statute of limitations under New York criminal law. The final alleged criminal bookkeeping action—a "hush money" payment to former porn star Stormy Daniels by former Trump "fixer," and more recent convicted felon, Michael Cohen—was on Dec. 5, 2017. The statute of limitations thus tolled over three years ago. That alone should suffice to dismiss the case.
...