^^^ The second thing that comes to mind is a grand jury that is made up of people who have the same mindset, and base their judgment on that mindset rather than clear evidence of harm to people or damage to property.
This portraits perfectly what is the modus operandi of Trump supporters. Nothing is about facts, nothing is about the law, about evidence, about proving assertions or matching reality with what is being said. It is all about "a mindset". Even when a great jury is called, if the result is not to their liking is just because they are wrong - no need to prove anything.
Hard facts are just something that can be ignored, it does not matter that Trump has never climbed let's say, Mount Everest, with the right "mindset", all Trump supporters will swear that he has and anyone doubting is because "partisanship".
Trump supporters have the facts. Herre they are, again, for you to read... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.55119252. Even if you don't like a few of these facts, there are many you will like. And none of them are illegal.
In America, standard law is "innocent until proven guilty." The law even says that an agreement CANNOT be made by the defendant to state that he is guilty when he is not. So, there you are with the hard facts. They are hard for you, because you can't get around them.
If you have solid proof that Trump is guilty of wrongdoing, take him to court on it. If you don't, it's just another bunch of hearsay like they are throwing at him in these sham trials.
I do not see anything in that post that would prove that he is not a criminal. If you want to talk politics, do so in a thread about politics, this thread is about a suspected criminal activity. Example: I save three people from dying in a fire (not that Trump has done any of it) and next day I steal car and drive drunk. I can be prosecuted for car theft and dui.
More clear? I can be a great film producer and director or a very popular singer, but if I sleep with children I can and should go to jail.
If you want to talk politics, I suggest you do so by topic so that it can actually be discussed, not by listing unconnected things. Some of the statements are not accomplishments but statistics of an economic lifecycle, some others are the results of Obama's policies and work, some others like "legalising hemp" are of dubious value anyway, but as said, listing does not allow a honest discussion, which of course is what you seek.
. Nothing to see here. 
