XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Dan Metcalf in the middle of the group @ Bitcoin Beltway Conference, June 2014.
Dan's linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82
Which douche bag is Jasin Lee? He was there too, right?
He is not in the photo
Topic: [XC][XCurrency] Decentralised Trustless Privacy Platform / Encrypted XChat / Pos - page 41. (Read 1484219 times)
October 31, 2014, 10:59:37 AM
Dan Metcalf in the middle of the group @ Bitcoin Beltway Conference, June 2014.
Dan's linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82
Which douche bag is Jasin Lee? He was there too, right?
He is not in the photo
October 31, 2014, 10:58:57 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
I don't think their motives are to buy cheap XC.
70 btc of buy support showed up last night at the exact same time the chat log screenshots were posted...
Very interesting....
Are you guys saying this guy is your fudster?
mav137
Im part of that wall, yesterday low was 46k, that's where im at at the moment.
I was too busy responding too the frikkin FUD to take advantage of the price
I dont expect it to drop that low again, but when it does, those coins are mine
edit
at least the volume is back
I was too busy responding too the frikkin FUD to take advantage of the price
I dont expect it to drop that low again, but when it does, those coins are mine
edit
at least the volume is back
October 31, 2014, 10:57:18 AM
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/scam-blocknet-the-metcalfprom-alt-coin-cartel-scam-exposed-841223 Coinada helps test XC knew you were Halc Dev and admitted it, not only that but Syn knew about this as well... so maybe its time you put down the scam and clear the air instead dan... Some pretty irrefutable proof popping up.
again more fake FUD by some motivated trolls from the SDC camp
I'm sure we can pull the IP address's from the log files of the server running this site...
Wow now you're pinning this on the sdc camp playing the poor me fud slingers ruining my day? and threatening to pull ip logs..you are digging quite the hole here dan for someone who is an advocate for anonymous ideology!
Just answer everyone and stop being so evasive please i'm sure you can understand how suspicious all this is looking.
October 31, 2014, 10:56:47 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
I don't think their motives are to buy cheap XC.
70 btc of buy support showed up last night at the exact same time the chat log screenshots were posted...
Very interesting....
October 31, 2014, 10:56:14 AM
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Dan Metcalf in the middle of the group @ Bitcoin Beltway Conference, June 2014.
Dan's linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82
Which douche bag is Jasin Lee? He was there too, right?
October 31, 2014, 10:54:40 AM
kawaiiiii!!!
XC TEAM AT CONFERENCE!
Dan Metcalf in the middle of the group @ Bitcoin Beltway Conference, June 2014.
Dan's linkedin: http://www.linkedin.com/pub/dan-metcalf/12/1a8/b82
October 31, 2014, 10:52:53 AM
atcsecure,
So now you're willing to say for the record that you had no involvement in HAL? You didn't develop for HAL?
And UTIL?
So now you're willing to say for the record that you had no involvement in HAL? You didn't develop for HAL?
And UTIL?
The only coins I have created are XC and Blocknet
Yes, the only coins you have created are XC and Blocknet, but that wasn't the question. Wording is important here, Dan. Try to be straightforward, please.
The 'alias' making the serious and feasible allegations here is Prometheus.
You and he clearly have some sort of relationship.
If you would not define the nature of your relationship as being a 'part of his crew', then what is the nature of your relationship with Prometheus?
Because whether you know it or not, you have been associating yourself with coins in which Prometheus is involved and he has been using your involvement as a means to pump and dump these coins.
Edit:
Furthermore, Prometheus has been saying that you wrote part, if not all, of the Halcyon code.
What we, the public, saw was that you reviewed Halcyon's code. If what Prometheus says is true, it would mean that you would have given the public the impression that you were reviewing code that you had actually written.
Which is it? Did you write all or part of it or just review it?
I've been a loyal supporter here for a long time, Dan, and you've no doubt delivered a lot of amazing technology to this community.
I'm just trying to obtain an objective understanding of all of these allegations.
October 31, 2014, 10:46:50 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
I don't think their motives are to buy cheap XC.
70 btc of buy support showed up last night at the exact same time the chat log screenshots were posted...
October 31, 2014, 10:45:45 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This is a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
This. The blocknet was announced weeks ago. It's no coincidence that all this fud has only just surfaced now during the ITO.
October 31, 2014, 10:45:32 AM
its really sad and pathetic what has happened with the reputation here. And this is actually all because of Prom, if anyone is to blame here, he has to set the record straight and disassociate himself with Dan. It has caused much turmoil and is now distracting the team from doing their job/coding. Dan I think you should personally ask Prom to set the record straight, I'm not sure it will help at all because it looks like most of the damage is done, but it will help. The only problem now is that this new FUD will be brought up the next time we have a good pump back up into the 100k range or higher. I guarantee it
October 31, 2014, 10:45:26 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This is a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
Thing is, most of us knew it was coming. They were planning this attack for weeks before the ITO. They were even working on a dedicated site for it. It's one camp, and one camp only. XC & BlockNet pose a MAJOR threat to their vaporware coin with an anon tech in the works that will never develop.
October 31, 2014, 10:43:46 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This is a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
I wish I can buy some cheap...
October 31, 2014, 10:43:40 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
I don't think their motives are to buy cheap XC.
October 31, 2014, 10:42:05 AM
For those wondering what these insane fudsters motives are: Fewer Block shares sold means they will control a higher percentage. Lower XC prices means they can buy a bunch cheap. This is a well organized attack and probably the sickest thing I've seen in crypto so far.
October 31, 2014, 10:41:41 AM
I heard some rumor that atcsecure = EDwArd SNowden?
Dan, is it true? The evidence is pretty strong... see above.
Dan, is it true? The evidence is pretty strong... see above.
I knew it! Irrefutable proof! Better start a new scam thread.
October 31, 2014, 10:40:11 AM
I don't know what to believe or who to trust anymore in this alt-coin shit-hole.
October 31, 2014, 10:39:52 AM
I heard some rumor that atcsecure = EDwArd SNowden?
Is this true?
Is this true?
shhh!!!!!!!!! don't let the secret out
I am agnostic about all this, but your way of handling criticism is very unprofessional. You should provide a detail of the premine expenses, I dont understand how people can avoid just basic business etiquette.
October 31, 2014, 10:39:07 AM
I heard some rumor that atcsecure = EDwArd SNowden?
Dan, is it true? The evidence is pretty strong... see above.
Dan, is it true? The evidence is pretty strong... see above.
Well, I'm sold. Case closed.
October 31, 2014, 10:35:28 AM
I heard some rumor that atcsecure = EDwArd SNowden?
Is this true?
Is this true?
shhh!!!!!!!!! don't let the secret out
October 31, 2014, 10:35:10 AM
atcsecure,
So now you're willing to say for the record that you had no involvement in HAL? You didn't develop for HAL?
And UTIL?
So now you're willing to say for the record that you had no involvement in HAL? You didn't develop for HAL?
And UTIL?
The only coins I have created are XC and Blocknet
Jump to: