Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1555. (Read 4670972 times)

Your transaction has been mined - if it's not been received on the other end they need to make sure they're synced up to the network and they have refreshed their wallet.

It was mined yesterday in block 174 516, you can check on any of the block explorers: http://chainradar.com/xmr/transaction/d031bf01b4529bfe90fce237b4dab4b5c09e26fd29e1fd48949efc7f028bc804

Quote from: simonyng on Today at 03:50:02 AM
HELP  HELP  HELP  HELP
My coin is sent,but not recived.

what client version are you using? https://minergate.com/blockchain/mro/transaction/d031bf01b4529bfe90fce237b4dab4b5c09e26fd29e1fd48949efc7f028bc804


I used version is :0.8.8.1   win764bit   not guiwallet.

HELP  HELP  HELP  HELP
My coin is sent,but not recived.
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.400000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 1.000000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.900000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.400000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.080000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.600000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.400000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.100000000000
Height 174516, transaction fc7f028bc804>, spent 0.200000000000

It's too much for one coin to bear.  Make it stop...

I would very much like to have that discussion at some other time. If you are talking about nothing at stake than that has been addressed. If it is some other novel new attack vector than i would be very interested.

Proof of centralization currencies are all flawed. The more you work to get all the value into your control, the more you're rewarded. Not that that's any different from how things are now .. but in this case leaving $10,000 under my mattress would literally mean that I can have $10,500 next year. Once the work is done .. you can create infinite value (relative to yourself) with no work. Sounds neat .. but isn't how things work. There's no effort there. You're literally agreeing to hand people everything for nothing when it's pretty common knowledge that people don't have everything to give for nothing .. so that makes no sense. It's a neat investment idea, if one were so inclined .. but it just sounds retarded to me. Coupled with a PoW .. then there still might be somehting there.

A short read:

Distributed Consensus from Proof of Stake is Impossible
https://download.wpsoftware.net/bitcoin/pos.pdf

It works. Until it doesn't.

I do not see why PoS is so flawed... I think PoW is much worse... but no hope is lost as all the currencies can switch from PoW to PoS....

I also choosed the name after the ISO standard, to be exact: 639-2/B. When you look on the international floor , then you see they use exactly this standard: ENG, FRE, SPA, CHI and so one and so forth. Also most german chatrooms or subforums, etc, use -ger, when the plattform, they use, is used internationally

For those who havent heard yet, we are running a Monero Giveaway!

Learn how you can earn 0.4 XMR here: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/petitioning-cryptsy-btc-e-and-others-for-moneroxmr-731365

Your English is fine:) Let's take Proof of Stake out the picture, as PoS is flawed in many respects, and that is a discussion for another time. The rest of what you're saying is spot on, and it is both how Monero works and will work in the future. The higher your mixin level, the more signatures you mix with for your transaction. But then your transaction is also physically bigger (in terms of the kb size of your transaction). When we move to per-kb fees, this will mean that the higher your mixin, the higher the privacy (more ring signatures), and the more costly that transaction will be to you.

Hi!
Today i was thinking about an old affirmation of the dev about the fixed transaction cost amn how they will implement a "dynamic" fee based on the "weight" in kB of the transaction.
I had an idea, that probably will never work or is totally incorrect, but maybe someone smarter then me will have some usefull inspiration:

Monero is an anoncoin with possible multiple encription layer, you can choose, while sending the transaction, how much you want it to be encripted and, obviusly, more is encripted, more it weight and more it will cost.
I was wondering about an option who let people do not encrypt their transaction and then send it without transaction fee (or with really low fees). Plus, we can use both the current algo plus Proof of Stake; all the client will become node and they'll prioritize these "free" transaction while miners will prioritize encrypted transaction (that with their fees will help ghe network keep running). Client of the PoS, if i recall correctly, will act as a torrent client, sendind and receiving transaction with little power and bandwith consumption, but they'll not receive any payment (or a really small one, like an equal [not proportional] distribution of the low fees).
I think this could be a really good feature!

Please do not kill me for this tought and sorry for my bad English!

Damn right it would interest us (at least me ). Thanks for the link meeh!

I'll be in-line waiting to try out the browser bundle for sure .. I didn't even know that was a thing.

I guess this would interest you guys as much as the Anoncoin people/fans

https://geti2p.net/en/blog/post/2014/08/15/The-privacy-solutions-project

this is not a nonsense that is like the bitcoin as they have the same gbs of blockchain

Also interesting:  CZ has yet to comment on whether he is Andrei.  Not that it would impugn his code in any way.  As far as I can tell Andrei is quite competent.  Having committed many similar youthful indiscretions, I would not hold the past authorship of a botnet against him.

Is this CZ?  http://krebsonsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/01/Andrey-Sabelnikov.png

How does the Wild Keccak code compare to epee stylistically?

The pdf signatures being so out of whack are the most interesting part of that. I don't think those were looked into so heavily before. It's crazy to see that v1 paper was made after the v2 paper.

Worth a look:

"Blowing the lid off the CryptoNote/Bytecoin scam (with the exception of Monero)"

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/blowing-the-lid-off-the-cryptonotebytecoin-scam-with-the-exception-of-monero-740112

Yes you are right. 3/8*2=0.75 and 5/8*2=1.25. The point, however, still remains exactly the same.

#monero-de would make more sense. Principle of least astonishment, ISO 639.