[XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1558.

blaaaaacksuit

sr. member

Activity: 280

Merit: 250

Who cares?

Quote from: rpietila on August 13, 2014, 04:36:17 PM

Quote from: From Above on August 13, 2014, 03:14:29 PM

How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay.

Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.

Why do you believe this?

rpietila

donator

Activity: 1722

Merit: 1036

Quote from: From Above on August 13, 2014, 03:14:29 PM

How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay.

Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.

Febo

legendary

Activity: 2744

Merit: 1288

Quote from: From Above on August 13, 2014, 03:14:29 PM

How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Which peak?

Spaceman_Spiff

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1001

₪``Campaign Manager´´₪

Quote from: cAPSLOCK on August 12, 2014, 04:13:09 PM

Quote from: r05 on August 12, 2014, 04:08:11 PM

Quote from: AnnoyMint on August 12, 2014, 03:14:51 PM

Quote from: aminorex on August 12, 2014, 11:11:04 AM

You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.

You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.

I have already solved the problem on that goes until.

But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.

Far to go more.
Power consumtion not you?
Orthagonal elucidation.
I already did it!

Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.

I think you're missing the point. there are indices yet to address which we need to factor into the vertex manipulation which will no doubt result in a bilateral view of this whole predicament. In layman's terms, we should direct our energy toward the pruning of such ridiculous hyperbole from an otherwise unique technical and scientific standpoint in order to progress and further our collective understanding of each node of an otherwise complex and fragmented system element.

I think what you are saying is we may have drifted a little too far off topic. And I think this is true.

That was an artful double troll up there though.

Or you could just keep on going and become the second meme-speak-coin after Doge....
(Honestly, this chaos-talk is pretty fun Wink

)

From Above

hero member

Activity: 700

Merit: 520

How is Monero doing these days? had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Atrides

hero member

Activity: 658

Merit: 500

Admin of DwarfPool.com

Quote from: Atrides on August 12, 2014, 06:33:03 AM

I have released Monero stratum proxy (open source).

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8310952

Added how-to for windows installation

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8331755

OmarGsPools

sr. member

Activity: 392

Merit: 250

I'm having issues compiling monerod. This is what it spits out after compiling using Ubuntu VM 14.04 with boost 1.56. It fully compiled but running ./bitmonerod gives me this:

2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.519609 Starting...
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520657 bitmonero v0.8.8.1()
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520777 Module folder: ./bitmonerod
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.521277 Initializing p2p server...
Segmentation fault (core dumped)

Any ideas? I had no issues when on Ubuntu 13 but after the update it was complaining about 1.53 and I know the stock 1.54 boost wasn't compatible with bitmonero and other cryptonote coins.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

Quote from: fluffypony on August 13, 2014, 06:20:07 AM

Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go.

Ah, OK. You know better...

Quote from: fluffypony on August 13, 2014, 06:20:07 AM

What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.

So there are possible solutions

I'm impressed of the fast response and the fact you indeed thought of possible solutions. WTG!

fluffypony

donator

Activity: 1274

Merit: 1060

GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com

Quote from: NeuroticFish on August 13, 2014, 05:51:15 AM

It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version.
It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check.

Ohwell, maybe in the next version

Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go. What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.

NeuroticFish

legendary

Activity: 3668

Merit: 6382

Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!

It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version.
It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check.

Ohwell, maybe in the next version

HashInvest

full member

Activity: 143

Merit: 100

Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net

Quote from: xulescu on August 12, 2014, 09:57:33 PM

Quote from: cinnamon_carter on August 12, 2014, 08:54:22 PM

I want to study this further...

I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....

With good reason based on experience.

The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size.

Many people still running outdated clients. I see such transactions in daemon logs several times per day so far.

thefunkybits

legendary

Activity: 1218

Merit: 1000

Freee XMR anybody?? Grin

More info in the official thread: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/petitioning-cryptsy-btc-e-and-others-for-moneroxmr-731365

xulescu

sr. member

Activity: 263

Merit: 250

Quote from: cinnamon_carter on August 12, 2014, 08:54:22 PM

I want to study this further...

I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....

With good reason based on experience.

The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size.

generalt

legendary

Activity: 1096

Merit: 1021

Quote from: kuno on August 12, 2014, 08:11:20 PM

Quote from: generalt on August 12, 2014, 07:52:34 PM

Wow what happened to the hashrate on moneropool.com? Shocked

From their front page:

08-13: Pool upgrade in progress. Mining works fine in background. Stats back at ~ 03:00 UTC.

LOL I'm such an idiot for not checking the main page. Thanks for the info!

cinnamon_carter

legendary

Activity: 1148

Merit: 1018

It's about time -- All merrit accepted !!!

I want to study this further...

I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....

With good reason based on experience.

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: gwada971 on August 12, 2014, 08:24:19 PM

For sure, but will take a look at what incorporated trade escrow service is promising

If you are referring to multisig which enables on-chain escrow, that will definitely be supported in Monero. Whether or not the other project's code turns out to be useful or if we implement it another way remains to be seen.

If you are referring to something other than multisig, please explain because I'm not aware of a specific trade escrow feature being promised.

gwada971

jr. member

Activity: 32

Merit: 10

For sure, but will take a look at what incorporated trade escrow service is promising

smooth

legendary

Activity: 2968

Merit: 1198

Quote from: gwada971 on August 12, 2014, 08:17:26 PM

Hi dev, have tou seen the last news about bytecoin, news in the dev seems interesting, will it be incorporated in monero soon ?

Our strategy is always to evaluate changes and features from the other cryptonote-derived coins and decide ourselves whether to incorporate those changes more or less unchanged, incorporate them in modified form, or not incorporate them at all.

gwada971

jr. member

Activity: 32

Merit: 10

Hi dev, have tou seen the last news about bytecoin, news in the dev seems interesting, will it be incorporated in monero soon ?

kuno

newbie

Activity: 37

Merit: 0

Quote from: generalt on August 12, 2014, 07:52:34 PM

Wow what happened to the hashrate on moneropool.com? Shocked

From their front page:

08-13: Pool upgrade in progress. Mining works fine in background. Stats back at ~ 03:00 UTC.

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1558. (Read 4671920 times)