Author

Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1558. (Read 4670972 times)

legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
How low will it go?  hehehehehe  Huh

who cares other than you?  Tongue

IDK... Robin Williams?
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
How low will it go?  hehehehehe  Huh

who cares other than you?  Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2296
Merit: 1031
How low will it go?  hehehehehe  Huh
legendary
Activity: 3570
Merit: 1959
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay.

Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.

Why do you believe this?

probably because he really knows his shit? + this... https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/xmr-rpietila-monero-economics-thread-702140
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1000
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Why don't you donate Jojaetok the 5,000 xmr offered then we'll talk ?
legendary
Activity: 1918
Merit: 1190
Please,
you can remove "Currently Ddos'd" off monero.crypto-pool.fr .
I have not DDOS'd

And if DDOS begining
And DDOS clasic TCP/UDP  is perfectly under control with arbor and Architecture network/system
And DDOS stratum is perfectly under control now if rebegining with new version of script monitoring .

Last day impact is very lower . Pool as good resisted only 15 minutes perturbation

Thanks,

sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
Who cares?
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay.

Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.

Why do you believe this?
donator
Activity: 1722
Merit: 1036
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Many are willing to buy in but do not understand that when the turn comes, they may not have the opportunity. The ones who waited in 0.002315 are still waiting to buy in. I would forecast that the definite turn happens next week. My original forecast was Sunday, this week, but today's action was weak and vwap was lower than yesterday, hence the delay.

Technically etc., the coin is doing fine. So I am afraid the boom mentioned in the first paragraph may start happening already this week. (My forecast is still next week.) 0.00334 looks like it is close but will prove to be strong as a wall, making this the last cheap entry.
legendary
Activity: 2730
Merit: 1288
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~

Which peak?
legendary
Activity: 1638
Merit: 1001
₪``Campaign Manager´´₪
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.

You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.

I have already solved the problem on that goes until.

But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.

  • Far to go more.
  • Power consumtion not you?
  • Orthagonal elucidation.
  • I already did it!

Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
I think you're missing the point. there are indices yet to address which we need to factor into the vertex manipulation which will no doubt result in a bilateral view of this whole predicament. In layman's terms, we should direct our energy toward the pruning of such ridiculous hyperbole from an otherwise unique technical and scientific standpoint in order to progress and further our collective understanding of each node of an otherwise complex and fragmented system element.

I think what you are saying is we may have drifted a little too far off topic.  And I think this is true.

That was an artful double troll up there though.

Or you could just keep on going and become the second meme-speak-coin after Doge....
(Honestly, this chaos-talk is pretty fun  Wink )
hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 520
How is Monero doing these days?  had sold all at the peak.

~CfA~
hero member
Activity: 658
Merit: 500
Admin of DwarfPool.com
sr. member
Activity: 392
Merit: 250
I'm having issues compiling monerod. This is what it spits out after compiling using Ubuntu VM 14.04 with boost 1.56. It fully compiled but running ./bitmonerod gives me this:


2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.519609 Starting...
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520657 bitmonero v0.8.8.1()
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.520777 Module folder: ./bitmonerod
2014-Aug-13 16:00:47.521277 Initializing p2p server...
Segmentation fault (core dumped)


Any ideas? I had no issues when on Ubuntu 13 but after the update it was complaining about 1.53 and I know the stock 1.54 boost wasn't compatible with bitmonero and other cryptonote coins.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go.

Ah, OK. You know better...

What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.

So there are possible solutions Smiley


I'm impressed of the fast response and the fact you indeed thought of possible solutions. WTG!
donator
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1060
GetMonero.org / MyMonero.com
It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version.
It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check.

Ohwell, maybe in the next version Smiley

Well, the thing is, we don't want the daemon making non-p2p connections unless explicitly allowed by the user, so checking via the web is a no-go. What we *can* do is add functionality where if > 58% of connected peers (ie. 7 of the standard 12 max) are on a newer version, notify the user that a new version is available. Peers can indicate the last mandatory version, too, and if you're on a version < that version the daemon can pump out lots of warnings, and simplewallet can have an additional confirmation dialog for every transaction before sending.
legendary
Activity: 3668
Merit: 6382
Looking for campaign manager? Contact icopress!
It's not the first currency where I tell this: one of the first features of a wallet should be to check, at least at start-up, if it's outdated and tell the user to update. There will always be 2 version numbers available: last known version and last mandatory version.
It's not difficult to implement and even the command line wallet can have that check.

Ohwell, maybe in the next version Smiley
full member
Activity: 143
Merit: 100
Pools: XMR.HashInvest.net
I want to study this further...

I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....

With good reason based on experience.

The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size.

Many people still running outdated clients. I see such transactions in daemon logs several times per day so far.
legendary
Activity: 1218
Merit: 1000
sr. member
Activity: 263
Merit: 250
I want to study this further...

I get concerned with quick changes and 'mandatory' updates....

With good reason based on experience.

The mandatory update is pretty old now. It is mandatory because the old versions used a fixed TX fee much too small to prevent dust and spamming. If you tried to use an old version, no miner would take your transaction. This also helps blockchain size.
legendary
Activity: 1096
Merit: 1021
Wow what happened to the hashrate on moneropool.com?  Shocked

From their front page:

08-13: Pool upgrade in progress. Mining works fine in background. Stats back at ~ 03:00 UTC.

LOL I'm such an idiot for not checking the main page.  Thanks for the info!
Jump to: