Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1559. (Read 4670622 times)
August 12, 2014, 08:36:32 PM
DDOS perfectly undercontrol now
August 12, 2014, 07:16:35 PM
Okay guys, XMR seems to be on drugs these days or umm well, posts. We don't want to create MoneRoad, right?! 
August 12, 2014, 07:02:22 PM
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
Code:
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01110011 00100001
Message received.
*beep* *boop* bzzzz*
250 000 XMR transferred to your personal holdings.
http://www.youthink.com/quiz.cfm
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
Code:
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01110011 00100001
Don't mock me my friend. It's a condition of mental divergence. I find myself on the planet Ogo, part of an intellectual elite, preparing to subjugate the barbarian hordes on Pluto. But even though this is a totally convincing reality for me in every way, nevertheless Ogo is actually a construct of my psyche. I am mentally divergent, in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life here. When I stop going there, I will be well. Are you also divergent, friend?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L9ya6G5S8MA
August 12, 2014, 06:36:48 PM
Do you realize that the New Horizons spacecraft will reach it's closest approach to Pluto on July 14 of next year? It was launched years before btc.
In other news I have finished my buying of Monero. No this time I mean it. Now I wait patiently for it's completion.
In other news I have finished my buying of Monero. No this time I mean it. Now I wait patiently for it's completion.
Congratulations to both of you. I doubt that I can finish buying before New Horizons sends back snaps, but I will try diligently.
August 12, 2014, 06:16:18 PM
Do you realize that the New Horizons spacecraft will reach it's closest approach to Pluto on July 14 of next year? It was launched years before btc.
In other news I have finished my buying of Monero. No this time I mean it. Now I wait patiently for it's completion.
In other news I have finished my buying of Monero. No this time I mean it. Now I wait patiently for it's completion.
August 12, 2014, 05:29:07 PM
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
Code:
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01110011 00100001
Don't mock me my friend. It's a condition of mental divergence. I find myself on the planet Ogo, part of an intellectual elite, preparing to subjugate the barbarian hordes on Pluto. But even though this is a totally convincing reality for me in every way, nevertheless Ogo is actually a construct of my psyche. I am mentally divergent, in that I am escaping certain unnamed realities that plague my life here. When I stop going there, I will be well. Are you also divergent, friend?
August 12, 2014, 05:24:50 PM
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
Code:
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01110011 00100001
Message received.
*beep* *boop* bzzzz*
250 000 XMR transferred to your personal holdings.
August 12, 2014, 05:21:27 PM
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
Code:
01011001 01101111 01110101 00100000 01010000 01100101 01101111 01110000 01101100 01100101 00100000 01100001 01110010 01100101 00100000 01101110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01101001 01101110 01100111 00100000 01100110 01110101 01100011 01101011 01110011 00100001
August 12, 2014, 05:17:11 PM
No, this has to go on for a few more pages so that anyone new to xmr trying to get the tl;dr thinks the whole show is run by a bunch of raving lunatics.
August 12, 2014, 05:13:09 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
I think what you are saying is we may have drifted a little too far off topic. And I think this is true.
That was an artful double troll up there though.
August 12, 2014, 05:08:11 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
August 12, 2014, 04:54:54 PM
My head hurts. 
August 12, 2014, 04:47:38 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
You forgot:
- Muh pruning decision of blockchaining therefore
August 12, 2014, 04:14:51 PM
You've got to be kidding me. I've been further even more decided to use even go need to do look more as anyone can. Can you really be far even as decided half as much to use go wish for that? My guess is that when one really been far even as decided once to use even go want, it is then that he has really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like. It's just common sense.
You still haven't addressed the issue I brought above concerning go wish upthread. It is impossible for far go to sustain orthogonal relationships with technological irregularities above the limit of up decided one to have used it or not.
I have already solved the problem on that goes until.
But I am far too busy to elucidate where half as much will go from far decision space on a parabolic axis.
- Far to go more.
- Power consumtion not you?
- Orthagonal elucidation.
- I already did it!
Alas I must rest for a week now, but before I go I want to remind you not to forget what I haven't talked about yet.
August 12, 2014, 02:22:05 PM
We win
August 12, 2014, 02:11:41 PM
This algorithm has power consumption than x11 not you?
Indecipherable gibberish.
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
ROTFHRMGFFD!
August 12, 2014, 02:10:39 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
I wonder if it's possible to take what they have done and push it forward to make it untraceable. Is this a hard problem?
It is not trivial. We think it is solvable.
However, there is always a work around which is to surround the traceable transaction between two untraceable ones. (In some cases only one is needed.) That prevents tracing, though at some increased cost in transaction fees.
August 12, 2014, 02:06:56 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
I wonder if it's possible to take what they have done and push it forward to make it untraceable. Is this a hard problem?
August 12, 2014, 02:01:31 PM
https://forum.cryptonote.org/viewtopic.php?f=12&t=257#p857
This version won't be untraceable (i.e. ring signatures with non-zero mixin) but it's still unlinkable (one-time addresses). However, they noted "the data structures were designed in such a way as to allow for untraceability via ringsigs in the future."
August 12, 2014, 01:35:03 PM
Jump to: