I tried using transfer 0,transfer 1 and even a lower amount of XMR keep getting an error.
I have updated to the latest wallet. Some help here please.
Topic: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency - page 1573. (Read 4670972 times)
August 04, 2014, 08:29:39 PM
Having issues sending XMR to MintPal.
I tried using transfer 0,transfer 1 and even a lower amount of XMR keep getting an error.
I have updated to the latest wallet. Some help here please.
I tried using transfer 0,transfer 1 and even a lower amount of XMR keep getting an error.
I have updated to the latest wallet. Some help here please.
August 04, 2014, 08:21:17 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
Just curious, but from whom?
Yep. The entire transaction was about 623 XMR in all. There's no way that was the entire order book from ~470k to 8000k.
Understood. but seriously. if you fat-finger a decimal point in a drunken trade, is the exchange liable for your fubar? Just curious/sayin/wonderin...
August 04, 2014, 08:17:14 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
Just curious, but from whom?
Yep. The entire transaction was about 623 XMR in all. There's no way that was the entire order book from ~470k to 8000k.
August 04, 2014, 08:00:02 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
Just curious, but from whom?
August 04, 2014, 07:31:35 PM
Some other fat finger at Gox the other day probably wanted to sell 5 BTC at 800 and managed to sell 800 BTC at 5. That's when I stopped complaining about how much my day sucked.
Ouch! Any screenshot, source, something?Sorry, I was too busy LMFAO'ing. Consider it an anecdote or a fable unless somebody corroborates. Maybe bitcoinwisdom can dredge some data (market sell completely out of the blue with no continuation, quantity between 790 and 820 BTC when market price was within 10 units of quantity - that's all I remember).
August 04, 2014, 07:24:22 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
Just curious, but from whom?
August 04, 2014, 07:18:18 PM
Some other fat finger at Gox the other day probably wanted to sell 5 BTC at 800 and managed to sell 800 BTC at 5. That's when I stopped complaining about how much my day sucked.
Ouch! Any screenshot, source, something? 
August 04, 2014, 07:08:11 PM
Some other fat finger at Gox the other day probably wanted to sell 5 BTC at 800 and managed to sell 800 BTC at 5. That's when I stopped complaining about how much my day sucked.
Geez, that's insane.
August 04, 2014, 07:05:28 PM
Some other fat finger at Gox the other day probably wanted to sell 5 BTC at 800 and managed to sell 800 BTC at 5. That's when I stopped complaining about how much my day sucked.
August 04, 2014, 07:03:49 PM
Quote
163 Moneros for 10 BTC
A message from the future. XMR is so good, it will allow superluminal communications.
August 04, 2014, 06:58:35 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
August 04, 2014, 06:30:50 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Oooops. Someone made a MAJOR mistake surely. 163 Moneros for 10 BTC
EDIT:
August 04, 2014, 06:15:49 PM
Nice. But this looks like all the known public pools have over 90% of the HR. I added the HR #s on the chart and they equal the estimated network rate. Does this mean that the combined % for solominers, private pools and botnets is <10%?
Yep, pretty much. I was kinda surprised there wasn't more unknown/solo hashrate as well. The total network hashrate is just a simple estimation based on the current diff, but it matches pretty well with what all the pools are reporting. Let me know if you think something is off though, and I'll be happy to try and fix it.
We only have an upper bound on solo and private pools if botnets use public pools. I would be interested in some insight from the public pool ops whether there is any way they can identify bots with any likelihood better than a Bayesian guess.
August 04, 2014, 06:10:50 PM
Nice. But this looks like all the known public pools have over 90% of the HR. I added the HR #s on the chart and they equal the estimated network rate. Does this mean that the combined % for solominers, private pools and botnets is <10%?
Yep, pretty much. I was kinda surprised there wasn't more unknown/solo hashrate as well. The total network hashrate is just a simple estimation based on the current diff, but it matches pretty well with what all the pools are reporting. Let me know if you think something is off though, and I'll be happy to try and fix it.
August 04, 2014, 05:05:21 PM
Hola Moneritos y Moneritas,
I put together a python script to plot the pools by their hashrate. Here is a recent output for the larger pools:
And here is output for smaller pools:
PCFiL has started running the script on his pool server, so you can always check updated versions here: http://xmr.poolto.be/#alternative
Please consider sending some hash his way for helping people see who has all the hash on the network.
The script is available at https://gist.github.com/jwinterm/c417d05d819bbefd22d0 if anyone else is interested, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments
I put together a python script to plot the pools by their hashrate. Here is a recent output for the larger pools:
And here is output for smaller pools:
PCFiL has started running the script on his pool server, so you can always check updated versions here: http://xmr.poolto.be/#alternative
Please consider sending some hash his way for helping people see who has all the hash on the network.
The script is available at https://gist.github.com/jwinterm/c417d05d819bbefd22d0 if anyone else is interested, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments
Nice. But this looks like all the known public pools have over 90% of the HR. I added the HR #s on the chart and they equal the estimated network rate. Does this mean that the combined % for solominers, private pools and botnets is <10%?
August 04, 2014, 04:58:13 PM
Guys, can someone explain to me what happened on HitBTC earlier today that made the chart go crazy?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
Someone realy bought all the way up to 0.08???
EDIT:
It seems so... Order book shows all trades up to 0.08... so wierd, why would someone do that...?
August 04, 2014, 04:52:49 PM
The only issue here is inflation.
Stop or massively slow the mining.
No coin's value can withstand PoW inflation.
The lesson has been learned in every coin to date that is PoW.
The only coin that has come close to resisting it is Bitcoin. And even BTC struggles with it daily.
The day everyone gets this inescapable truth will be a good day.
Wtf are you talking about, do you even know? With pow there is usually a set number of coins, i.e 21 million. There is no inflation, nothing is hidden, it is usually all spelled out in the coins announcement.
Unlike proof of stake coins, which just continue in perpetuity for what ever % stake they grant over what ever period of time was chosen.
I think you are getting confused with speculation vs inflation. Just stop spreading misinformation, please.
August 04, 2014, 04:04:18 PM
Hola Moneritos y Moneritas,
I put together a python script to plot the pools by their hashrate. Here is a recent output for the larger pools:
And here is output for smaller pools:
PCFiL has started running the script on his pool server, so you can always check updated versions here: http://xmr.poolto.be/#alternative
Please consider sending some hash his way for helping people see who has all the hash on the network.
The script is available at https://gist.github.com/jwinterm/c417d05d819bbefd22d0 if anyone else is interested, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments
I put together a python script to plot the pools by their hashrate. Here is a recent output for the larger pools:
And here is output for smaller pools:
PCFiL has started running the script on his pool server, so you can always check updated versions here: http://xmr.poolto.be/#alternative
Please consider sending some hash his way for helping people see who has all the hash on the network.
The script is available at https://gist.github.com/jwinterm/c417d05d819bbefd22d0 if anyone else is interested, and please let me know if you have any questions or comments
August 04, 2014, 03:54:15 PM
Mumbles, the Devs very cleared stated what they believe to be important and non-important issues at this stage in the coins development.
The website just isn't important right now. They've demonstrated this to you time and time again. Yes, they said they were working on it and intimated that it would be fixed shortly.
But it hasn't.
And that's okay to me because I've listened to what they've said about the other issues they're dealing with. And if what they're saying is correct - the website just isn't important right now. What good is a sparkling fresh website for a product that isn't ready for the masses? At best it would be considered a "bait and switch".
Several people have stepped up and said that they would code the design of the website so that the devs don't have to bother. But the devs would have to bother. You would expect them to deploy code without reviewing it first? And that reviewing takes time. And they've obviously determined that the time to do that is not as important as the time required to fix real bugs.
(And if you're speaking about something other than the website, like actual Monero code, it's on github. Please show where you or some other complainer has been denied a pull request.)
The website just isn't important right now. They've demonstrated this to you time and time again. Yes, they said they were working on it and intimated that it would be fixed shortly.
But it hasn't.
And that's okay to me because I've listened to what they've said about the other issues they're dealing with. And if what they're saying is correct - the website just isn't important right now. What good is a sparkling fresh website for a product that isn't ready for the masses? At best it would be considered a "bait and switch".
Several people have stepped up and said that they would code the design of the website so that the devs don't have to bother. But the devs would have to bother. You would expect them to deploy code without reviewing it first? And that reviewing takes time. And they've obviously determined that the time to do that is not as important as the time required to fix real bugs.
(And if you're speaking about something other than the website, like actual Monero code, it's on github. Please show where you or some other complainer has been denied a pull request.)
Spot on. The design is not and has never been an issue, and everyone who has offered assistance has wanted to offer design assistance. That is the (relatively) trivial part. The thing that is taking time is getting the content right. I cannot begin to tell you the amount of time spent slaving over a turn of phrase and its implications. Nothing is perfect, and everything will change and iterate, but we want to things to be good from the outset and not have to spend inordinate amounts of time redoing it later. It's bad enough that we have to refactor a metric ton of CryptoNote reference code as we go;)
August 04, 2014, 03:50:49 PM
What do you guys (the devs) think about the possibility of trezor support? Would it even be possible? I'm thinking probably not since the trezor is producing Secp256k1 signatures and inorder to produce a valid signature on monero it would need to be a ring signature (idk what that standard is called but its probably not Secp256k1). Is it just the case that inorder to have something like a trezor it will have to be purpose built for cryptonote platforms?
I haven't dug into the Trezor internals, but I'd guess that it would need a Trezor of its own to work. I'm unsure as to whether or not the hardware is general purpose enough to handle the ring signature stuff. It's definitely something to consider, but then again once there is demand and utility you may find a completely different crowd up and beats Trezor at their own game, you know how these things go:)
Jump to: