Я про то, что "богачи" это более вероятно сторонники бу, Вер и майнеры. И сливать будут не бу, а коре. Если есть цель переманить оставшихся майнеров и пользователей. Хз что там думает о безопасности своей сети команда коре, если все козыря у бу
А прикиньте такой сценарий: Сатоши проснётся, восстанет из мертвых и устроит BU кровавую ночь
дело в том что Сатоши большеблочник по натуре
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.15366Quote from: satoshi October 04, 2010, 07:48:40 PM
It can be phased in, like:
if (blocknumber > 115000)
maxblocksize = largerlimit
It can start being in versions way ahead, so by the time it reaches that block number and goes into effect, the older versions that don't have it are already obsolete.
When we're near the cutoff block number, I can put an alert to old versions to make sure they know they have to upgrade.
а вот человек наванговал
Quote from: kiba on October 06, 2010, 01:09:04 AM
Quote from: jgarzik on October 04, 2010, 06:33:55 PM
Quote from: martin on October 04, 2010, 11:50:35 AM
No, it's incompatible if just a few people change their behaviour. To roll out a change to the network you need to get most of the clients understanding both the old and the new protocol, and then when you have a majority you turn on the new protocol.
You just described a whole-network upgrade. I'd call that an incompatible change Smiley
The effort to raise the transaction rate limit is the same as the effort to change the fundamental nature of bitcoins: convince the vast majority to upgrade.
If we upgrade now, we don't have to convince as much people later if the bitcoin economy continues to grow.
I agree, especially since generators are both the source of blocks and "votes" in the network. Since a block restriction would allow generators to charge higher transaction fees, they might "vote" against an increase in the max size in the future.
It seems unlikely to be a real problem though.
