you say
Hey, I'd rather other forms of making bitbeans useful and promoting organic (yes, I know, lol) growth, but tying it into a bean farming company as a form of shareholding wouldn't be a bad idea. Anything to give the bitbean altcoin a purpose aside from letting its community down would be a big plus!
So far I've seen pictures of shelves full of cans of beans and a picture of beans in a breakfast meal in response to legitimate complaints about the way the "dev" goes about his business.
The sad part is I don't think he's really trying to scam anyone and believe him when he said he had family issues to deal with. I just think he has horrible business sense, instincts, communication skills and no real idea of how to build and maintain a strong and supportive community to help grow an altcoin.
If you're going to keep us in the dark and feed us poop, you should strongly consider changing the name to ShroomCoin, at least then the coin name is tied to actual propertiies.
that can be done but will need time ... and until the dev is seen as devoted and committed to the project, or else new tech support steps in ... then outside commitments can not be done ... also the website properties need to be held by vetted community members.