Author

Topic: [ANN] [PASC] PascalCoin, true deletable blockchain - V3 Hardfork on block 210000 - page 115. (Read 990744 times)

member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.
I think all future coins will use deletable blockchain not just ETH only. PASCAL COIN is a pioneer of deletable blockchain coins . That means lots of coins that will migrate to deletable blockchain and they have to be hardfork. While PASCAL COIN pure deletable blockchain without hardfork.
full member
Activity: 294
Merit: 107
Is it planed to increase the adress generation speed?
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.
Hardfork is not a good way for a coin. The greater the safebox will be to increase the time for syncing, aggravating PC and wasteful bandwidth. This will result in reduced nodes and aggravate network power. I think the situation is right now, and pascal coin is a pure untouched coin hardfork altogether. I think pascal coin is a very precious coin, unlike other coins whose address is worthless.
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.
Because miners PASA owners do not fully trust the 3rd party PASA market. Because of the lack of confidence that resulted in the amount of PASA supply in the market less than the maximum pasa. Pasa / miner owner hopes there is PASA market in gui wallet. Possibly over time of trust will arise and market pasa can be used optimally. While whitepaper V2 mentions the presence of pasa market in the wallet.
sr. member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 288

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.

just looking into the future.
full member
Activity: 286
Merit: 102

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.

I don't understand. There are around 510,000 unused PASAs. Only 4442 accounts have a balance bigger than 0.0000. There are two web sites where PASAs are sold. So I can't see any bottleneck.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.


I think it should be possible and I agree , there should be more PASA. 1000% agree. 
sr. member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 288

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.

just wondering if it's possible to provide pasc hardfork in order to increase pasa ammount.

cause imho this is the main bottleneck of pasc. why not to make larger safebox 60-100 gb to increase accounts/adopters number.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political

Interesting thread with Vitalik involved

https://twitter.com/AnonOnAMoose/status/873226461989277696

would be great to implement deletable blockchain for eth.

I think it would be an extremely messy fork to try to pull off.  Anyway, why do it?  Let's just have it on PASC.  That's a better opportunity for us to be early adopters in this new tech.
sr. member
Activity: 1932
Merit: 288
newbie
Activity: 14
Merit: 0
Dear all friend
I am an exhanger of PASC ( not minner) show can share me account via Public key:
3GhhbokJZXG3XxpLANiQAu69JEiRs1wcC1hsqu9c8fuJBeN4MbzYxbaDBBdpEwckrkqkobzZuYVqido iND9KL2KU2tzQkZuKFXwCt8
I want to store coin on my way
Thánks
yes why not you can store according to your own way and can be winner at any point too.
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. Tongue.  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.  

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok.  

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.
I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.

true but changing from PascalCoin to Pascal is not very confusing.
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. Tongue.  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.  

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok.  

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.
I think the name is the identity of a good or something that can be known to many people. If the name is changed from the beginning of its birth this will confuse many people. A new name means starting popularity from scratch. Name is not important for coin popularity. But more importantly how the technological developments adopted by the coin are used for many people for various purposes. And more importantly the function of the coin.
member
Activity: 92
Merit: 10
can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!
You can buy an account in www.pascwallet.com or mine in https://pasc.nanopool.org/you will get a free account address after mine 20 PASC and do not forget to enter your public key in settings.
legendary
Activity: 1246
Merit: 1011
can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

Perhaps a miner will send you one for free, but otherwise, check this out
http://getpasa.com/


I think http://getpasa.com/ is more expensive than https://www.pascwallet.com market ... but is your choice  Wink
legendary
Activity: 1302
Merit: 1008
Core dev leaves me neg feedback #abuse #political
So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. Tongue.  Pasa would be a fine name, too.

PascalCoin is not that great of a name for marketing.

Marketing isn't everything but it does mean something.   

I think Pascal is better than PascalCoin.  Anything with "coin" in it seems very dated.

Pask is ok. 

Right now community is very small, we need more voices and to have some more discussion.
sr. member
Activity: 280
Merit: 250
So we have some agreement on slack about dropping "coin" from the name and simply calling it Pascal.   We should get rolling on that.    I still like Pask more. Tongue.  Pasa would be a fine name, too.
newbie
Activity: 43
Merit: 0
can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!

Perhaps a miner will send you one for free, but otherwise, check this out
http://getpasa.com/
newbie
Activity: 2
Merit: 0
can someone share the wallet?

public key:
3GhhbovVTV1jQNPqRQksQquA2osv8F3YV6jErdUoLLCASHHP6aahf5tELn4zQNCk2SC4PKGwpW67wRw abctaArdyv9TgcVwzRLjcwy

Thanks!
Jump to: