BTW, just as proof that this 'dev team' isn't even developing this coin and are merely copy-pasting this useless clonecoin's code
Completely false accusation.
This is not a copy paste coinThen why does it have copy-paste code? Why would it have an address format of another coin?
See the top address with 13.3 million coins at address
B8Zkn2SfqQKE4uNJJfmuJNXgwak5NrwSW5 ?
The number of coins isn't the issue, the issue is that the addresses for this coin lead with an upper-case 'B' and not an 'S'. They couldn't even be bothered to change the address formatting to at least lead with the same letter as the name they gave this coin. That is how lazy these scammers are and how this coin is solely aimed at naive newbies who don't know any better.
It does not matter what the address starts with. B refers to Blockchain address.
LOL, sure it does, kiddo. And Litecoin's leading 'L' in its addresses stands for?
Look, there's a reason a coin is normally coded with a distinctive leading character and it is quite simple. If you copy an address from, say, a Blackcoin wallet, which is probably the basis for this coin's code as it is found on many clonecoins, and then accidentally paste it into a Signatum wallet and send coins to it, thinking it is a Signatum address, you'll lose those coins and they won't be received by anybody because they have been sent to an address derived from the Blackcoin blockchain, not the Signatum one.
If, however, Signatum had a leading 'S' or 's' then the send you would be trying to make with a leading 'B' address would fail and you would not lose your coins.
That is only an example of why you would look to use lesser-used leading characters in a wallet and, more importantly, it also proves beyond reasonable doubt that Signatum is absolutely a clonecoin because no developer would choose a leading 'B' this late in the industry as it is already used on so many other coins.
As I said, this 'dev team' couldn't be bothered to even change that bit of code from the wallet they copy-pasted from.