Author

Topic: [ANN] TiPS ★ Kimotos Gravity Well ★ World first coin anonymizer launched! - page 163. (Read 625588 times)

hero member
Activity: 984
Merit: 1000
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

I think you might misunderstan. I think people are saying that the max coins that can be produced is lowered, not the number of coins you hold. So you would still have 300 million. But within mining the limit will not go to 500 billion just 250 billions max. So this would INCREASE the value of your holding , not decrease it.

No I understand. I argue however that it would not increase the value but rather cause an almighty dump and the ultimate death of the coin simply because people do not want to be invested in a coin that is being fiddled about with beyond that which is absolutely necessary to ensure it survives (the kimoto gravity well implementation for example). If the dev changes the total supply of the coin then that is firstly an admission that it was faulty from the outset and secondly that changes the image and conception on which TIPS was built. It also is a downright stupid move to try and artificially increase the value of a currency and means nothing unless people are willing to spend more BTC for each coin which is extremely unlikey - people are not just going to suddenly pay 50% more per coin because there will eventually be only 250 billion coins. We need to focus on the goods and services available to be used or bought with TIPS - forget about trying to mess with the coins supply so you can get more bitcoin when you dump. The only people who want it increased are those trying to make more Bitcoin at the expense of others, it's a bad idea and it won't succeed.

This!
The coin doesn't need an artificial shortage. It's good enough to walk through difficult times like this when multipools hit it.
Once the coin mixing service and the gravity stuff is fully implemented and released, this coin will grow as it deserves. We don't need code fiddling just for short profit for people that don't believe.
full member
Activity: 182
Merit: 100
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

I think you might misunderstan. I think people are saying that the max coins that can be produced is lowered, not the number of coins you hold. So you would still have 300 million. But within mining the limit will not go to 500 billion just 250 billions max. So this would INCREASE the value of your holding , not decrease it.

No I understand. I argue however that it would not increase the value but rather cause an almighty dump and the ultimate death of the coin simply because people do not want to be invested in a coin that is being fiddled about with beyond that which is absolutely necessary to ensure it survives (the kimoto gravity well implementation for example). If the dev changes the total supply of the coin then that is firstly an admission that it was faulty from the outset and secondly that changes the image and conception on which TIPS was built. It also is a downright stupid move to try and artificially increase the value of a currency and means nothing unless people are willing to spend more BTC for each coin which is extremely unlikey - people are not just going to suddenly pay 50% more per coin because there will eventually be only 250 billion coins. We need to focus on the goods and services available to be used or bought with TIPS - forget about trying to mess with the coins supply so you can get more bitcoin when you dump. The only people who want it increased are those trying to make more Bitcoin at the expense of others, it's a bad idea and it won't succeed.



Those are wise words my friend! I totally agree now.
As you said- community should only protect and promote.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

I think you might misunderstan. I think people are saying that the max coins that can be produced is lowered, not the number of coins you hold. So you would still have 300 million. But within mining the limit will not go to 500 billion just 250 billions max. So this would INCREASE the value of your holding , not decrease it.

No I understand. I argue however that it would not increase the value but rather cause an almighty dump and the ultimate death of the coin simply because people do not want to be invested in a coin that is being fiddled about with beyond that which is absolutely necessary to ensure it survives (the kimoto gravity well implementation for example). If the dev changes the total supply of the coin then that is firstly an admission that it was faulty from the outset and secondly that changes the image and conception on which TIPS was built. It also is a downright stupid move to try and artificially increase the value of a currency and means nothing unless people are willing to spend more BTC for each coin which is extremely unlikey - people are not just going to suddenly pay 50% more per coin because there will eventually be only 250 billion coins. We need to focus on the goods and services available to be used or bought with TIPS - forget about trying to mess with the coins supply so you can get more bitcoin when you dump. The only people who want it increased are those trying to make more Bitcoin at the expense of others, it's a bad idea and it won't succeed.

sr. member
Activity: 277
Merit: 250
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

+1
 Fedora is at 2000% from start and touch 7500% in only 2 weeks ,just holding, that's awesome.
This is first bubble, i'm waiting next and next again.
Gooo Fedora.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

I think you might misunderstan. I think people are saying that the max coins that can be produced is lowered, not the number of coins you hold. So you would still have 300 million. But within mining the limit will not go to 500 billion just 250 billions max. So this would INCREASE the value of your holding , not decrease it.

This
+1
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.

I think you might misunderstan. I think people are saying that the max coins that can be produced is lowered, not the number of coins you hold. So you would still have 300 million. But within mining the limit will not go to 500 billion just 250 billions max. So this would INCREASE the value of your holding , not decrease it.
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.



Absolutely right. You DO NOT fuck about with the supply of a coin after many have put thousands of dollars into it. It is not like we have bought something then discover an altered model on display at the shop - this is the equivalent of buying something then after a few weeks of using it discovering that the manufacture broke into your house overnight and changed core components without your consent.

It is unethical and completely foolish. ANY major change to a coin will result in massive dumping and a decrease in our investment.

If you want a more scarce coin then go away and buy Catcoin or Feathercoin or any of the other 100 hundred currencies out there, but do NOT mess with others investment. I didn't buy 300 Million TIPS to have people on a forum change the recipe post purchase.
member
Activity: 118
Merit: 10
I am sure all holders would love a reduction in 4/5ths of the coins to increase their holdings, but for the same reasons that a new Fed Coin shouldn't be created I am against it.

As I holder of quite a few coins I still say this.

sr. member
Activity: 308
Merit: 250
Riecoin and Huntercoin to rule all!
I would definitely like it if you'd reduce it to 100 billion.
legendary
Activity: 1386
Merit: 1000
When everything is done? In how many days?

and can you please reduce the total amount of coin about 30-50% to maybe 250-350 billions?

i dont know if i should go all in in tips now.  Grin
because this coin has the most grwoing potential (when the coins will be reduced)
When the coin "only" go to 400 i think a lot of persons will be rich.  Cheesy
full member
Activity: 154
Merit: 100
Excellent. Down to 40 as the low and now back on the rise just as predicted hehe Nice little 18% increase in total TIPS ;-)
full member
Activity: 177
Merit: 100
TIPS will scyrocket to 900 latoshi!
newbie
Activity: 42
Merit: 0
This coinmixing feature seems interesting Smiley

I was not mining TIPS until now.. but I promise to my with all my hashing power = 200kh/s (sorry not much :/)

Any generous donation would be nice: EUWxfpznHgWYqmyYPv8aaHR1YccLxTQxvi
hero member
Activity: 630
Merit: 503
pls reduce the total coins from 500 billion to like 250 oder 300 billion?  Kiss

i think when you reduce the max. amount of coins we will see this in deh price as well.

That might not be a bad idea if it is possible. If the new coin release rate is slower, a max on the number of coins (being smaller) might be useful. But not as important as the other developments you guys are working on!
yeah
invisible can u do this?
newbie
Activity: 8
Merit: 0
Cool only mined these for 5 hours or so last night got 300,000.

Whats with the super low difficulty?

That low diff is actually high for FedoraCoin. Blocks are taking way to long.
hero member
Activity: 732
Merit: 500
While we are talking about any and all new and improved features for Fedora...

Any chance you could create a way to mine the system without all the scrypt coding.
That stuff is complicated and I feel that if it was simplified for someone without a degree in computer science, you'd open up a whole new level of volume to the coin.
Probably been discussed over and over... if so, sorry to reiterate it.
I'm just saying that I gave up on the mining because it's too difficult for my simple mind to set up.
IMO whoever creates an easy way to set up the system will bring in "buku" amounts of volume.

Fedora rocks!

legendary
Activity: 1960
Merit: 1176
@FAILCommunity
And why is it not on http://coinmarketcap.com/ anymore ?

I am sure that developer is doing something atm. Don't worry about that.
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
full member
Activity: 168
Merit: 100
Cool only mined these for 5 hours or so last night got 300,000.

Whats with the super low difficulty?
newbie
Activity: 21
Merit: 0
sometimes you need to go down for the better restart Wink
Jump to: