Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 202. (Read 554401 times)
March 05, 2014, 10:48:01 AM
maybe Terk should consider mine LTC directly to avoid too low profits
March 05, 2014, 10:45:39 AM
...and we're under 100%.
March 05, 2014, 10:32:06 AM
The majority of my rejects are "Untracked Statum" rejects (Haven't had one since I posted this)
From what I could gather earlier on IRC, the untracked stratum rejects are caused by a bug in cgminer and it doesn't not affect your accepted hashrate.Terk checked some dudes stats, and even though said person had 40-50% rejects out of ~600Kh/s, his stats page showed ~600Kh/s accepted.
Check your statistics page and see if it matches what your client is saying.
March 05, 2014, 10:31:14 AM
Trying Clever to test for 2 days
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
Your cgminer settings will need to be tweaked here apparently to deal with reject % (I'm experimenting - will share results when I have some that are decent).
I agree, last two days have not been hot. Looking at poolpicker, they've not been so hot everywhere - but lots of us are considering temporarily mining at hashcows or middlecoin - they seem to be having "less worse" slumps.
The majority of my rejects are "Untracked Statum" rejects (Haven't had one since I posted this)
I should have stayed on CoinSolver, just had a 0.02 payout last night and jumped over here just to test.
Just don't like the bad efficiency. Should be at 100% minimum. I never go below 100% on CS. Usually around 200% with 3% rejects.
I will report back after a whole 24hrs
Split your hashrate if you can for best comparison.
I'm considering doing that, putting 1 card on middle, 1 on cs, and another here - to show direct results over a week. It's not a horrible strategy too, because you get to average your gains (high and low) over multiple sources.
Meh, if the variance is just a few mBTC, I am not worried about it. I will pick which site I like the best, CoinSolver obviously, and stick with it. However, if it is not a few mBTC then that's when I will split the hash and see. However, I don't foresee that happening. That is why I am testing CM now.
Edit: Fuck middlecoin in all honesty. I will never mine there
March 05, 2014, 10:23:57 AM
Trying Clever to test for 2 days
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
Your cgminer settings will need to be tweaked here apparently to deal with reject % (I'm experimenting - will share results when I have some that are decent).
I agree, last two days have not been hot. Looking at poolpicker, they've not been so hot everywhere - but lots of us are considering temporarily mining at hashcows or middlecoin - they seem to be having "less worse" slumps.
The majority of my rejects are "Untracked Statum" rejects (Haven't had one since I posted this)
I should have stayed on CoinSolver, just had a 0.02 payout last night and jumped over here just to test.
Just don't like the bad efficiency. Should be at 100% minimum. I never go below 100% on CS. Usually around 200% with 3% rejects.
I will report back after a whole 24hrs
Split your hashrate if you can for best comparison.
I'm considering doing that, putting 1 card on middle, 1 on cs, and another here - to show direct results over a week. It's not a horrible strategy too, because you get to average your gains (high and low) over multiple sources.
March 05, 2014, 10:20:26 AM
Trying Clever to test for 2 days
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
Your cgminer settings will need to be tweaked here apparently to deal with reject % (I'm experimenting - will share results when I have some that are decent).
I agree, last two days have not been hot. Looking at poolpicker, they've not been so hot everywhere - but lots of us are considering temporarily mining at hashcows or middlecoin - they seem to be having "less worse" slumps.
The majority of my rejects are "Untracked Statum" rejects (Haven't had one since I posted this)
I should have stayed on CoinSolver, just had a 0.02 payout last night and jumped over here just to test.
Just don't like the bad efficiency. Should be at 100% minimum. I never go below 100% on CS. Usually around 200% with 3% rejects.
I will report back after a whole 24hrs
March 05, 2014, 10:15:07 AM
Trying Clever to test for 2 days
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
Your cgminer settings will need to be tweaked here apparently to deal with reject % (I'm experimenting - will share results when I have some that are decent).
I agree, last two days have not been hot. Looking at poolpicker, they've not been so hot everywhere - but lots of us are considering temporarily mining at hashcows or middlecoin - they seem to be having "less worse" slumps.
March 05, 2014, 09:51:32 AM
Trying Clever to test for 2 days
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
In 9 hours, 0.00477785 BTC @ 2Mh/s
A: 804352 R: 256000
23% Reject rate....1 getwork failure.....64% efficiency...
Not looking so hot Clever.
March 05, 2014, 09:10:33 AM
up again
March 05, 2014, 09:01:36 AM
what's wrong? being DDOS?
March 05, 2014, 09:00:08 AM
March 05, 2014, 08:56:41 AM
frontend down?
March 05, 2014, 08:43:31 AM
https://i.imgur.com/5TauHBG.jpg
It sucks. I hope the alts can pull out of the slump and be profitable again. It almost isn't worth my power usage at the moment.
It sucks. I hope the alts can pull out of the slump and be profitable again. It almost isn't worth my power usage at the moment.
March 05, 2014, 08:34:54 AM
I was one of the fools that decided to try my hand at one of the more profitable pools today, according to poolpicker.
If you take a look at the current graphs on poolpicker, you can probably guess which one I decided to moo-ve to.
Needless to say, at this point, all of my hash are belong to CleverMining.
Also I have a lot of unexchanged and unpaid coins on hashsCows for a 12 daysIf you take a look at the current graphs on poolpicker, you can probably guess which one I decided to moo-ve to.
Needless to say, at this point, all of my hash are belong to CleverMining.
One thing I've noticed with clever, is that I tend to almost always have 0.01 in unexchanged coins waiting in my balance. A lot of the trading must be manual (not necessarily a bad thing) - but it's mentally frustrating to see a 0.01 payment when there is > 0.01 in unexechanged waiting that could have been sent if only it was exchanged, only to see unexchanged balance even higher during the next payout.
March 05, 2014, 08:32:10 AM
Litecoin is currently #8 on Coinwarz at the moment I started typing. I have not seen it that high for as long as I can remember. Almost all of the coins above Litecoin are such small networks, Clevermining probably doesn't even touch them. All altcoins are down significantly in value, plus add in lots of newcomers and lots of new investment in hardware (GPUs still hard to come by at a decent price or quantity), you end up with low profitability for all. I don't see how profitability can be increased beyond Litecoin unless the altcoins experience significant growth in value. Probably going to continue to see shrinking profit / MH going forward unless another phenomena like Doge comes along.
March 05, 2014, 08:22:07 AM
There were minutes of downtime in the EU server. I also wanted to point out that the statistics server loadings have become significantly slower in the last hour.
March 05, 2014, 07:48:24 AM
Damn profits are down. I just reached 0.1 Bitcoin mined on here yay
March 05, 2014, 07:05:27 AM
The profitability has been bad lately and there's really no excuse for it. If it's going to be (or has a good chance of being) less profitable than Litecoin, just mine litecoin. Sick of seeing every second hour being 50% less profitable than LTC, and all the profitable hours remaining un-exchanged or immature.
March 05, 2014, 06:15:19 AM
really, all markets going down. I dont' understand how he can to do even 0.007
May be in this situation wee need to mine to the furute? Like growing markets, time to-time sales, base on market trade for trading last 3 days. And volume of trades.
This is very hard to to, but we can to do 0.02-0.03
For examole this morning SAT 2 or 3 Satochi at 4 Diffucty
PND like same..
it is not subject to algorithmization. It is necessary to know the volume of trading, the dynamics of the blocks, complexity, speed reduction rewards to understand that if a new fork now mine easy, then 3 days later it will be easy to sell, received 300% more.
perhaps enough to have a list of priorities, SAT, KARM, PND, ZEIT... something like this ther standard profit too low.
main idea to get some millions of garbage coins ther rate of exchange is on sight, and try to resale for market price, or ++1 price.
I think profit-term monthly volume override hung on the exchange funds. Otherwise I do not understand why bother to do it when profit is worth LTC.
Maybe I'm wrong, and everything will return to an acceptable level. But I rarely see a sharp rise in markets all too spread out through a calculator and the reaction rate.
So chances only an outsider.
May be in this situation wee need to mine to the furute? Like growing markets, time to-time sales, base on market trade for trading last 3 days. And volume of trades.
This is very hard to to, but we can to do 0.02-0.03
For examole this morning SAT 2 or 3 Satochi at 4 Diffucty
PND like same..
it is not subject to algorithmization. It is necessary to know the volume of trading, the dynamics of the blocks, complexity, speed reduction rewards to understand that if a new fork now mine easy, then 3 days later it will be easy to sell, received 300% more.
perhaps enough to have a list of priorities, SAT, KARM, PND, ZEIT... something like this ther standard profit too low.
main idea to get some millions of garbage coins ther rate of exchange is on sight, and try to resale for market price, or ++1 price.
I think profit-term monthly volume override hung on the exchange funds. Otherwise I do not understand why bother to do it when profit is worth LTC.
Maybe I'm wrong, and everything will return to an acceptable level. But I rarely see a sharp rise in markets all too spread out through a calculator and the reaction rate.
So chances only an outsider.
March 05, 2014, 05:47:03 AM
Yep i noticed this also... this is very weird.
the profits dropped pretty drastically if you ask me... by like 30% i really hope Terk fixes the earnings asap or explains us what happen?
I moved to the EU pool with rejects of around 3.5-4%~
even though the stats say that for 24hours: Rejected: 0.1 MH/s (0.7%)
the profits dropped pretty drastically if you ask me... by like 30% i really hope Terk fixes the earnings asap or explains us what happen?
I moved to the EU pool with rejects of around 3.5-4%~
even though the stats say that for 24hours: Rejected: 0.1 MH/s (0.7%)
Jump to: