I am running a 4x280x machine and a 1x7950 machine. Should I be using a different wallet address for each machine? and why?
thx
thx
No, you can use the same one.
Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 244. (Read 554387 times)
February 23, 2014, 06:21:15 PM
No, you can use the same one.
February 23, 2014, 06:08:41 PM
Do the math then, before statements.
February 23, 2014, 06:03:44 PM
500,000 shares to wafflepool, without a single reject. 0%. Same rig was getting 24% rejects from CM.
Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
Comeon it's been said a thousand times. It's normal for this pool. He's running different software.Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
Its not normal though, it's the only pool that does it. When you are losing 5-10 mh in rejects, it doesn't matter if you get slightly more btc/mh on much less mh.
February 23, 2014, 05:55:13 PM
I am running a 4x280x machine and a 1x7950 machine. Should I be using a different wallet address for each machine? and why?
thx
thx
February 23, 2014, 05:54:45 PM
500,000 shares to wafflepool, without a single reject. 0%. Same rig was getting 24% rejects from CM.
Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
Comeon it's been said a thousand times. It's normal for this pool. He's running different software. Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
February 23, 2014, 05:42:11 PM
500,000 shares to wafflepool, without a single reject. 0%. Same rig was getting 24% rejects from CM.
Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
Terk, there is definitely something busted on clevermining's side. I really prefer CM's design, so please get this fixed! :-)
February 23, 2014, 05:37:52 PM
Terk, I have a problem, my reject rate had stabilized at 2-3% below the pool`s reject, them out o the blue they become consistenly higher than the pool's.
http://www.clevermining.com/users/1GWKr5FFQapZwVHadq86yX1bE6tPhLDN26
this is the second time it happens today
last time i had to stop all miners, switch to another pool for 10 min and after I got back everything was back to normal
My miners began to receive this reject message: Low difficulty share
this is really strange
my internet has been fine, no disconnects whatsoever
prior to the changes my reject rate used to have a pattern but they never became so higher than the pool's for such a long time
Thanks for your effort
http://www.clevermining.com/users/1GWKr5FFQapZwVHadq86yX1bE6tPhLDN26
this is the second time it happens today
last time i had to stop all miners, switch to another pool for 10 min and after I got back everything was back to normal
My miners began to receive this reject message: Low difficulty share
this is really strange
my internet has been fine, no disconnects whatsoever
prior to the changes my reject rate used to have a pattern but they never became so higher than the pool's for such a long time
Thanks for your effort
February 23, 2014, 05:19:11 PM
I just jumped up to 60% rejected user shares...CGminer showing them as rejected (low difficulty share) but even so that's a bit concerning how high it just jumped when it was steady at 5% or less for the past few hours. This is happening on all 3 of my rigs too?
It's now leveled off and dropped down to 40% or so...
It's now leveled off and dropped down to 40% or so...
I'm getting the same thing - low diffculty share reject. Reject rate is about 10%
February 23, 2014, 05:16:30 PM
I just jumped up to 60% rejected user shares...CGminer showing them as rejected (low difficulty share) but even so that's a bit concerning how high it just jumped when it was steady at 5% or less for the past few hours. This is happening on all 3 of my rigs too?
It's now leveled off and dropped down to 40% or so...
It's now leveled off and dropped down to 40% or so...
February 23, 2014, 05:13:01 PM
I mined here at CleverMining and had a 10-20% reject spread. Sometimes it would spike at 25%. Switched pools and have literally less than 1% rejects. I would mine here if the reject rates weren't so awful but as of now I don't enjoy losing 700kh/s of speed on average over a couple days.
I hope you are basing these numbers off of your actual long term reject % and not the 10 min interval chart on the site. Was your long term % really 20% as reported in Cgwatcher??
That chart on the site is very misleading. It will spike all over the place and freak people out, as it did myself. Then I go look in cgwatcher after 10 hrs and my reject rate is 4%. Which is fine by me.
February 23, 2014, 05:04:08 PM
I mined here at CleverMining and had a 10-20% reject spread. Sometimes it would spike at 25%. Switched pools and have literally less than 1% rejects. I would mine here if the reject rates weren't so awful but as of now I don't enjoy losing 700kh/s of speed on average over a couple days.
February 23, 2014, 05:03:05 PM
For the billionth time - there is no coin list! And I agree 100% with Terk's decision. Why give away proprietary info?
February 23, 2014, 04:59:12 PM
Been working on one probably will have it finished and in the market tonight/tomorrow.
For starters I added CleverMining but I Intend to add all the coin switching pools
Hope you will enjoy it.
For starters I added CleverMining but I Intend to add all the coin switching pools
Hope you will enjoy it.
Just sent you a PM about the App in case you didn't see. Nice work by the way.
February 23, 2014, 04:55:11 PM
Is this a terrible reject rate?
http://i863.photobucket.com/albums/ab194/liquidxskin/rejects_zps05abd916.png
Which of the two is more important?
http://i863.photobucket.com/albums/ab194/liquidxskin/rejects_zps05abd916.png
Which of the two is more important?
Just go off cgminer/ watcher %. Not this chart. The chart is misleading.
February 23, 2014, 04:52:45 PM
I wonder if you do a multiple server you should also take some care on balancing payout variance issue so that you wont have issues like mc has.
February 23, 2014, 04:50:49 PM
Which of the two stats is more important?
February 23, 2014, 04:28:14 PM
Something wrong the past few hours for me, my rejects shown locally jumped up to 2-3x. And at the website it is showing rejects way more than that, over 50%. Bailing out until this is fixed.
February 23, 2014, 04:01:51 PM
There's a delay with Cryptsy withdrawals just like it was yesterday (after which was resolved a huge payout was sent). These coins are already exchanged into BTC so we don't risk currency rate changing, but they're pending withdrawal. As far as I know, other pools are affected as well. It's Sunday so I'm not sure how fast it will be resolved, but I believe there's nothing to worry about.
Does this mean the pool is only using 1 exchange? I moved some rigs here from MC a few days ago and I like what you have done here but you should probably develop a few more trading options, especially if you expect the pool to continue growing. Besides helping to insulate from deposit /withdrawal issues, you will probably find the added book depth helpful.
totally agree on this. it would be good to eliminate single points of failure where possible, and putting all the exchange in one basket seems like a bad concentration of risk. i've had good experience with vircurex.
February 23, 2014, 02:51:01 PM
There's a delay with Cryptsy withdrawals just like it was yesterday (after which was resolved a huge payout was sent). These coins are already exchanged into BTC so we don't risk currency rate changing, but they're pending withdrawal. As far as I know, other pools are affected as well. It's Sunday so I'm not sure how fast it will be resolved, but I believe there's nothing to worry about.
Does this mean the pool is only using 1 exchange? I moved some rigs here from MC a few days ago and I like what you have done here but you should probably develop a few more trading options, especially if you expect the pool to continue growing. Besides helping to insulate from deposit /withdrawal issues, you will probably find the added book depth helpful.
February 23, 2014, 02:49:19 PM
It's definitely not a local config issue.. I've switched half my machines to Middle and half to Waffle, so far.. 50,000ish shares to each without any rejects (yet).
Jump to: