[ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 260.

talisin

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

Quote from: aclass on February 20, 2014, 08:22:56 AM

reject % in general does not really matter as different locations in EU have different ping results to the server

my ping is 222ms. what's yours?

Quote from: talisin on February 20, 2014, 07:45:01 AM

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

AS the server is not pingable as stated then i wouldnt know im afraid.

aclass

sr. member

Activity: 381

Merit: 251

reject % in general does not really matter as different locations in EU have different ping results to the server

my ping is 222ms. what's yours?

Quote from: talisin on February 20, 2014, 07:45:01 AM

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

EdBoon

newbie

Activity: 53

Merit: 0

Loving the user interface and the communications via twitter, but still getting 10-15% rejects on my 3.7 mh/s rig. If it were lower i would definitely bring over an additional 12 mh/s.

*based out of Atlanta

talisin

newbie

Activity: 33

Merit: 0

to the people calling for an EU server, chill your beans, im in the uk and only have 4.6 % reject for last 24 hours, having a server in the EU is not going to make a hell of a diffrence especially while there are still technical adjustements being made.

I would much have a stable / fully working code before getting a locall sourced server to provide bad / not tweaked code. Plus Terk has already said its on the to do list so consistantly saying +1 is not going to help at all in this matter except provide further stress to Terk which can lead to mistakes being made.

I would like to take this opertunity to thank Terk for his efforts and rapid responses when issues have arrisen and taking the time and effort to make this pool great and hopefully things will get better.

phrozenspite

sr. member

Activity: 266

Merit: 250

Quote from: sammy007 on February 20, 2014, 06:41:04 AM

Should I remove --no-submit-stale like for middlecoin?

You should never use that, your miner still generates stales, and there is a small chance that it will discard some valid ones. That is just for vanity.

webbson

member

Activity: 73

Merit: 10

IT Consultant

Quote from: corsaro on February 20, 2014, 06:57:54 AM

Quote from: jagali2014 on February 20, 2014, 12:38:29 AM

Quote from: Alpharoid on February 19, 2014, 02:47:56 PM

Quote from: sammy007 on February 19, 2014, 02:47:25 PM

Quote from: C892 on February 19, 2014, 02:08:19 PM

Quote

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

+1

I'm at 7-8% rejected Sad

corsaro

legendary

Activity: 1400

Merit: 1000

Quote from: jagali2014 on February 20, 2014, 12:38:29 AM

Quote from: Alpharoid on February 19, 2014, 02:47:56 PM

Quote from: sammy007 on February 19, 2014, 02:47:25 PM

Quote from: C892 on February 19, 2014, 02:08:19 PM

Quote

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

sammy007

legendary

Activity: 1904

Merit: 1003

Should I remove --no-submit-stale like for middlecoin?

sgsdebruijn

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

7 hours mining 5.52% rejects, stable now

"api-port" : "4028",
"expiry" : "1",
"failover-only" : true,
"log" : "5",
"queue" : "5",
"scan-time" : "1",
"temp-hysteresis" : "3",

"scrypt" : true,
"kernel" : "scrypt",
"kernel-path" : "/usr/local/bin"
}

pengoau

full member

Activity: 208

Merit: 100

--expiry 1 --queue 1 --scan-time 1

after 1hr 1/2, reject is at 10.5%
after 6hrs, reject is at 8.5%

Location: Australia

SirGeekalot

full member

Activity: 156

Merit: 100

i can back this up with another UK based Improvement.

although the rejects are still bouncing up and down the improvement is undeniable.

bloodrainer

newbie

Activity: 5

Merit: 0

Quote from: stark2032 on February 20, 2014, 02:37:32 AM

Is there an ETA of when VarDiff will be turned back on? I've been mining at other pools because 512 is too high for both my workers.

I mine with a 7850 @ 365mh/s and the vardiff aint much of a problem actually, all the variation in reported hashrate gets evened out in the long term, so as Terk tweeted, it only affects the variance.

FoFFiFFe

newbie

Activity: 19

Merit: 0

I don't know if my post will help but ...

I am located in Europe, specifically in France. And yesterday before the server update, I had around 20% of rejects, since the update things are alot better.
ATM i've got one 1,120kh/s rig, so almost 1,1MH, perfect beta-test rig.

http://image.noelshack.com/fichiers/2014/08/1392885690-clevermining.png

You can clearly see the difference between before 16:00pm (GMT+1) and after.

I've totally normal reject ratio, so it's possible to join and make profits with this pool even if you're european.

In this rig i've two card: one r9 280x with intensity of 13 and one 5870 with I=17.

Finally, i would like to thank Terk who did an outstanding job, is aware of the priorities and help us to make good profits.

sgsdebruijn

member

Activity: 84

Merit: 10

Last 5 hours 5.82% rejects from near Rotterdam, is a way better but i like to see a EU server as soon as possible.

I think your pool can grow a lot faster when you at an EU/Adia server Terk, a lot of people are scared of the rejectrate especially from EU with the higer pingtimes i think the efficiency could be a bit better.
Will stay as long as the profit is good and the rejectrate stays stable like it now is.

Continue your good work Terk!

stark2032

newbie

Activity: 2

Merit: 0

Is there an ETA of when VarDiff will be turned back on? I've been mining at other pools because 512 is too high for both my workers.

evolvia31

member

Activity: 74

Merit: 10

Hi terk,
during 12H period, my reject seems lower than yesterday, i have ~7-9% reject from France Europe.

pengoau

full member

Activity: 208

Merit: 100

running at 10.5% reject for the last 1hr 1/2.

dency45

newbie

Activity: 42

Merit: 0

Quote from: Quenouille79 on February 20, 2014, 12:42:48 AM

Quote from: neptunus on February 20, 2014, 12:39:27 AM

4 hours mining since last restart, CGWatcher reports 45% of shares as rejected...

you have a problem on your side, i got 10% reject avg in last 4hres

I also got a high reject rates of 36% with 6 hours mining. A problem on our side? Other pools(middlecoin,wafflepool,multipool) gave me 2-8% without changing any of my config.

pengoau

full member

Activity: 208

Merit: 100

Quote from: jagali2014 on February 20, 2014, 12:38:29 AM

Quote from: Alpharoid on February 19, 2014, 02:47:56 PM

Quote from: sammy007 on February 19, 2014, 02:47:25 PM

Quote from: C892 on February 19, 2014, 02:08:19 PM

Quote

[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification

Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)

Yeah, we need EUropean server!

+1

-1

Need an ASIA server

neptunus

newbie

Activity: 16

Merit: 0

Quote from: Quenouille79 on February 20, 2014, 12:42:48 AM

you have a problem on your side, i got 10% reject avg in last 4hres

...and the problem on my side is?

The only thing I think can cause this - is server location. Since on other pools (with EU servers) I got 2-3% is worst cases.
...or it is just a pool problem.

Just sharing the information, I will probably switch to the alternative pool.

Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 260. (Read 554387 times)