Did any of you even try looking through the thread (search?). He already said a EU server is in the works.
Thanks for the great service, Terk! I've been mostly pleased by the profits and uptime. Hopefully it keeps up!
Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 263. (Read 554401 times)
February 19, 2014, 02:01:37 PM
February 19, 2014, 01:47:56 PM
Quote
[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification
Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)
Yeah, we need EUropean server!
+1
February 19, 2014, 01:47:25 PM
Quote
[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification
Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)
Yeah, we need EUropean server!
February 19, 2014, 01:46:12 PM
what about vardiff? i read that it was enabled in the recent past and then the pool switched to a fixed diff=512. will we be able in the future to mine at vardiff with low end miners or to choose the diff by ourself?
I only have about 450 kh/s on my one card and I would like to see vardiff return as well.
February 19, 2014, 01:44:51 PM
Terk can you change the hash refresh time frame? an hour is way too long.
On your account's report page, if you scroll down below the hourly average there are charts at the bottom for 10 minute averages of hash rate and reject rate.
February 19, 2014, 01:08:19 PM
Quote
[18:06:05] New block detected on network before pool notification
Shouldn't the pool notify about block change? maybe that would reduce the rejected ratio a lot more.
Plus, my sgminer is using my failback pool A LOT, really A LOT. Maybe an EU server? (please??)
February 19, 2014, 12:56:56 PM
Are you addressing me? Because I have nothing to do with the pool operator, I'm just helping out lol.
Here's one technical explanation by Terk in case you don't know it yet.
Thanks for the URL for the explanation... I'll tweak a bit tonight to see if this will really make even more of a difference. Appreciate the assist....
r00tdude
February 19, 2014, 12:56:28 PM
what about vardiff? i read that it was enabled in the recent past and then the pool switched to a fixed diff=512. will we be able in the future to mine at vardiff with low end miners or to choose the diff by ourself?
February 19, 2014, 12:48:54 PM
Average rejects are displayed alongside your own rejects in the graph on your user stats page. Right now it's about 25%, so yours isn't even particularly bad.
All you need to know about -g 2 and intensity tweaking is written here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpu
All you need to know about -g 2 and intensity tweaking is written here: http://www.overclock.net/t/1461916/tutorial-ultimate-guide-to-tweaking-amd-cgminer-3-7-2-kalroth-edition-sgminer-instructions-included-aswell-get-the-most-hash-out-of-your-gpu
So are you trying to say that the same settings we all use and have used for months/years on profit/coin switching pools don't apply to yours because you all are doing something beyond what the most venerable pools are doing in this space? I'm just trying to understand why the admins of the pool are doing this finger pointing the miners' way. I've never seen reject rates above 10% ever... but here it's like I'm giving away 25% of my hash power and not getting the results I expect from a 90% or better share efficiency.
I want to drink the koolaid guys, don't get me wrong. There's a LOT to like here; that said, pointing the finger at the miners and saying they are doing something wrong to experience this problem only with your pool sounds unreasonable.
That said, I will adjust my mining configs tonight a bit and see if it has any appreciate effect, but I would like to know, in a detailed technical explanation from the pool admin(s) why this is our issue and not a pool-side issue.
Thanks a bunch for the work...
r00tdude
Are you addressing me? Because I have nothing to do with the pool operator, I'm just helping out lol.
Here's one technical explanation by Terk in case you don't know it yet.
Terk can you change the hash refresh time frame? an hour is way too long.
Scroll down on the page... February 19, 2014, 12:48:37 PM
Terk can you change the hash refresh time frame? an hour is way too long.
February 19, 2014, 12:45:38 PM
Terk, I think you should have a "news" section on the site, and tell people about what is going on, since not everyone digs through all the pages on this thread.
+1 this ^^^
Or maybe a shoutbox? Community building can be a good thing
February 19, 2014, 12:42:40 PM
We've been mining some very stable coins in recent minutes, so I don't expect the 1.4% rejected in the last 10 minutes to stay forever - it will be higher with different coins. But we've been having 6-8% with the same coins on the old server, so I guess it worked.
You might still experience occasional disconnects within the next hour or two as I'm tweaking some things, but your miners should be able to reconnect immediately.
February 19, 2014, 12:36:21 PM
I bet you will get a lot more action if you can add one server over here in Europe because rejects are killing most of us...
February 19, 2014, 12:31:01 PM
Terk, I think you should have a "news" section on the site, and tell people about what is going on, since not everyone digs through all the pages on this thread.
February 19, 2014, 12:26:10 PM
New server is ready and works 
Because i have lots of disconnect and I switch every 5 minutes to backup pool.
Because i have lots of disconnect and I switch every 5 minutes to backup pool.
February 19, 2014, 12:24:27 PM
My rigs are still bouncing around between --failover and CM. Lets hope this gets settled quick as my rigs don't always bounce around pools all day and stay at 100%... Stability is the #1 goal, rejects are a distant second if profits well exceed LTC.
February 19, 2014, 12:12:01 PM
I'm doing a log with the measurements of my gpu to find the best configuration for now lower the intensity as suggested several times by Terk really seems to work, please look here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1B-_UkIrGZYray8jb4K3Jnwx3JgweBHdaTCxgccgtFio/edit?usp=sharing
+1 for your question.
+1 for your question.
Thanks for the analysis - but I think we've gotten to the bottom of it given the additional server-side capacity addition and a marked drop in rejects since then. The last leg of the hashrate graph for me shows 5% rejects/stales which is really quite good. Looking forward to getting a full share at this point.
r00tdude
February 19, 2014, 12:09:23 PM
We’ve switched to a brand new server. Let me know if it improved your experience. I’m monitoring things from my side.
And just like that, I'm now down around 5% the last time period since you added the new server without changing anything on my side... so can we just say that it's a capacity issue and let it go at that?
Thanks Terk for being so responsive... better for all of us, and you!
r00tdude
February 19, 2014, 12:07:22 PM
Not usually one to remark about ~20min of graphs, but rejects tanked from 20 to 5%. Coin swap or server swap, something doing well. 
February 19, 2014, 11:53:35 AM
We’ve switched to a brand new server. Let me know if it improved your experience. I’m monitoring things from my side.
Jump to: