Topic: [ANN][AUTO-SWITCH] Profit-switch auto-exchange pool: CleverMining.com - page 29. (Read 554359 times)

Try the default, it should work well with a GS Blade.

Try frequencies 800 MHz, 825, 838 and perhaps 850 - see which one gives you best results in the pool stats.

working well, joined 22nd of Jan, regular payments every day 

Hi, i have a question about the difficulty to set.
I have a gridseeb blade 5.5mh/s and i want to know if i should let him at the standard difficulty or raise it?
What should be better?
Anyone have try it or can explain me more to get the best from hashrate?
Thanks all !!

Dear Team,

I haven`t been paid as well  never, way is that ?

Please check...

I have been paid in full on Jan. 19.

Time to switch my rigs to another pool! Thanks Jero, I allready have problems with my payouts! 

S3 won't work here. As alienesb mentioned you need a SHA256 pool, this is Scrypt. Try BTCGuild, Antpool, kano.is, Eligius (the last two allow mining without registering).

Clever is scrypt not sha dude.

pool is dead, no response from owner for a loooooooong time...

quick question, I'm not connecting to clevermining, have S3's

pool = stratum+tcp://us.clevermining.com:3333
worker = my bitcoin address
pass = 201

Anything special needed for worker? or pass?  instructions seem simple?  getting 100% rejected

No Payout on Jan. 11.?

Probably this:

https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8138087

Hi,

I stop mine on the pool for 3 weeks and my balance doesn't move since that date.
The FAQ explains week payements but if my unexchanged balance continue to be frozen, I don't know how it can be possible to be paid.

Thanks to resolve this issue.

Can someone  provide me terks home adres?
I forgot to send him my big present to say thanks for the free cancer http://www.shitexpress.com/

I have no problem with you.  I have no problem with the opinions of sensible people, of which, you seem to be one.  At least your post history seems to prove this.  If you aren't in any way, shape or form affiliated with CM in any manner besides a miner, then I apologize for asserting otherwise.  You can't deny though that there is no official, public communication from CM in the last month, and that you have been carrying the thread.  Whether that's an altruistic gesture or otherwise, that's what can be taken from the last months of posts in this thread.

While you may find my search of answers to be a series of accusations and assumptions, most of it is substantiated by two facts... CM mines 70% of the NLG mined in a given day, and Terk won't respond as to why he does it.  Not accusations and assumptions... facts.

I asked for answers.  I still haven't received one.

-Fuse

I have never sent a PM to or received a PM from Terk, nor do I have a need to talk to him about anything, since I haven't had any issues with the pool as a miner, which is what I am despite your repeated attempts to ascribe some mysterious role to me.

So no, sorry, I won't be able to provide you with any "official" response, nor did I ever say or imply that I would. You strolled into this thread with accusations and demands, read my opinion that you didn't like and started piling assumption upon assumption. I'm sorry that you're still unable to grasp that some posters can have personal opinions that don't align with yours, and that your assumptions could be just plain wrong.

Now if you're done here and your only remaining problem has something to do with me - please PM me. I'm sure nobody else is interested in this bickering.

Thanks, it will be nice getting CM off our back.

As far as your reply though... it's an undeniable fact you are the only person consistently here in the last month that has answered questions regarding CM.  Not Terk.  It's not grasping at straws, it's stating the obvious.  You keep this thread moving.  So kudos for that.  I fully understand the desire to help when help is needed.

You failed to address most of the points made in my post though.  Why help someone, specifically Terk, when they won't answer for themselves?  I'll take a guess, and I'm grasping at straws at this because there is obviously no information otherwise, but I'd say you probably talk to him regularly about the pool and miner's concerns.  If you didn't, how would you be able to continue to promote the use of this pool when the owner could very well have gone AWOL or misused miner's hashrate for personal gain?  There's no communication from Terk here.  There is communication from you though.

I'll stop asking for Terk to answer.  He is obviously too cowardly to answer for himself in his own thread.

So I'll ask you.  Why has CM been uncooperative in the issues NLG faced, and why has the hashrate increased over time despite Terk's statements that he wouldn't do so?

If you don't want to give an answer of your own, I'll take the answer Terk feeds you in PM.  I just want an official response from the pool that can be messaged to the people that want answers.

-Fuse

You're grasping at straws buddy. I'm answering whenever I think I know an answer that can help the person asking it, in this thread or any other thread. That's pretty much the essence of a forum. This is not "in place of Terk", or "for Terk", or standing "by CM", or "voice of authority" or any of those things that you keep making up.

Congratulations on the solution to your NLG issue.

You answer the questions miners post here in place of Terk.  Based on your previous comments here, you've proved that you're the voice of authority on most things CM.  While you may not be an official member of the pool op team, you're the only person keeping miners' questions answered.  If you don't stand by CM, why keep the thread questions answered for Terk?  Why not let him speak for himself?

I've told you before that it's as much about NLG, as it is about Terk's silence and obvious apathy towards not only NLG, but his own miners as well.  Sure, I'm pretty pissed that he controls 70% of the network and insta-sells them, but the fact that he won't say why is the real issue here.  There are hundreds of other altcoins, some of which would return much higher daily profits than NLG, but Terk continues to mine NLG.  Why?  If profit is the primary motivation for CM, and the payouts to the miners, some of which are reporting no payouts, is his primary concern, then why continue?

We've taken action though, after a lot of debate, and we are going to move forward with a new difficulty algorithm.  We didn't put blame on Terk when this issue started, we simply asked that he work with us to help keep the network running smoothly.  He agreed.  But then he realized what he could do and threw upwards of 90% of our network hashrate at the coin, halting the blockchain in periods of high difficulty for times upwards of 2 hours.  Yes, the difficulty algorithm was/is broken.  But so is a lot of trust in his ability to be anything less than a liar.

How can anyone stand by that and say it's ok?

-Fuse

Your standpoint on what Cleverminig is doing to NLG is totaly not cpyptocurrency friendly, that's for sure. I you really cared about the future of crypto, you would at least understand that what Terk is doing to the NLG is wrong. If i would have a quantum computer and i would own 70% of the total Bitcoin hashing power, how do you think people will react to that!?, not very friendly that's for sure. everybody that on purpose owns more than 50% of the net hashrate is automatically an enemy of the coin because there is to much power involved with such a responsibility. With clevermining it is much worse, because they don't give a fuck what they do to coins. There is no difficulty algorithm in the world that is totaly resistant against 70% hashrate jumps. So, no answer from Terk, he is watching this thread because he logs in to his account a few times a day, but refuses to answer any questions, a leader that does not communicate is not a leader. To all the miners out there with a conscious, stop mining with Cleverminig!.