Author

Topic: [ANN][Blocknet] truly decentralized exchange | token ecosystem infrastructure - page 212. (Read 1103293 times)

full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift







this is not realistic is it?

blocknets main coin XC is based upon anon transactions, this will never be acceptable in the "real world"  "legally".

let's just get cracking with some real action and bring on board some better coins before blocknet is over taken by similar projects.

The decentralised exchange is something that could make block and xc more relevant again.

I would say that there is no "main" coin in blocknet - it is a collective of coins who wish to participate with each other for the better of blockchain tech.  I would also say that XC being anon is just one small aspect of XC, the real gravy is where and how the anon is being accomplished - and how that tech can be used in other ways and applied into the real world.  Multipath and node rewards are no joke, the concepts can be extended and applied to other devices.  It opens the doors to stuff like this : http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~mmabdels/data/PIS.pdf

Happy  Saturday,


-BitSwift



 

Yep, what he said.
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift







this is not realistic is it?

blocknets main coin XC is based upon anon transactions, this will never be acceptable in the "real world"  "legally".

let's just get cracking with some real action and bring on board some better coins before blocknet is over taken by similar projects.

The decentralised exchange is something that could make block and xc more relevant again.

I would say that there is no "main" coin in blocknet - it is a collective of coins who wish to participate with each other for the better of blockchain tech.  I would also say that XC being anon is just one small aspect of XC, the real gravy is where and how the anon is being accomplished - and how that tech can be used in other ways and applied into the real world.  Multipath and node rewards are no joke, the concepts can be extended and applied to other devices.  It opens the doors to stuff like this : http://bbcr.uwaterloo.ca/~mmabdels/data/PIS.pdf

Happy  Saturday,


-BitSwift



 
legendary
Activity: 2100
Merit: 1167
MY RED TRUST LEFT BY SCUMBAGS - READ MY SIG
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift







this is not realistic is it?

blocknets main coin XC is based upon anon transactions, this will never be acceptable in the "real world"  "legally".

let's just get cracking with some real action and bring on board some better coins before blocknet is over taken by similar projects.

The decentralised exchange is something that could make block and xc more relevant again.
hero member
Activity: 605
Merit: 500
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift






Thanks for the update.
sr. member
Activity: 407
Merit: 254
yes, Bitswift. Thank you.

......do this on a regular basis, please.
sr. member
Activity: 387
Merit: 250
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift


Thank you for stopping by.  Appreciate your input and letting us know that the team is working together.
hero member
Activity: 496
Merit: 500
Hello,

Someone from SWIFT community asked to come here to make a few statements re:blocknet progression. 

I obviously can not release all information without the Blocknet foundations approval so please excuse my statements if they seem "brief".

Progress within Blocknet :

-Blocknet is in the process of ensuring it complies legally for business interactions in the real world.  This can take time, you must understand that running a business in legal form is much different than running a hobby coin for btctalk users.  There are a lot of things to consider when you join crypto networks into the business world.  Ensuring we have a legal framework is priority #1.

-Meetings are held regularly between the blocknet members.  We are working behind the scenes to decide on best practices for the foundation and its future members.

-Development is ongoing, technology is being discussed, ideas are being shared and progress is being made.

-Blocknet funds and multi sig options are being finalized.

Not sure what else I can say here without giving away to much information.  Please realize that blocknet is being run like a corporation, it involves many people from outside and inside our networks.  Massive Corporations are not built overnight.

Microsoft Progression : http://news.microsoft.com/facts-about-microsoft/
Apple Computers Progression: http://www.softschools.com/timelines/apple_history_timeline/252/
Google Progression:  http://www.google.ca/about/company/history/
IBM Stats:
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1890      
1895      
1900      
1905      
1910      
1915   4   1,672
1920   14   2,731
1925   13   3,698
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1940   45   12,656
1945   138   18,257
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1950   266   30,261
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1955   696   56,297
1960   1,810   104,241
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1965   3,750   172,445
1970   7,500   269,291
1975   14,430   288,647
Year   Gross income (in $m)   Employees
1975   14,430   288,647
1980   26,210   341,279
1985   50,050   405,535
1990   69,010   373,816
1995   71,940   225,347

---

Good things take time, remember this.

-BitSwift





hero member
Activity: 700
Merit: 500

HAha!  You guys are SO CLASSY!

I don't love it that ANYONE lost money.  Seen XC lately?  It's down like 75% and do you see me gloating even though I've been calling this for months?  and had the hell persecuted out of me for it?


Your account is 7 weeks old. If you've been calling anything for months it would have been through one of your other accounts that you'd have done so.

Normally I'd agree that it's the message that counts and that marginalizing the messenger is to be avoided. In your case, however, the messenger is enhancing the message.

You're a sensationalist. You latch on to a few points and sensationalize the shit out of them, making them out to be something entirely different.

You take the truth and paint a picture over top of it.

Truth: XC premine has been depleted
Your enhancement: XC authors dumped the premine.

Truth: The XC team promised transparency regarding expenditure of the premine and the latest from Dan is that he still plans to release further details when time permits
Your enhancement: The XC team promised transparency twice and hasn't delivered and is ignoring questions about their promise to be transparent.

You care not about providing the truth or delivering a message. You care about spinning the truth in such a way that fits the message you'd like to have delivered.

You're wasting your time dribbling on about this. At this point those who are likely to have sold their XC/BLOCK and moved on after having well received your skewed messages are no longer here paying attention to you. Those who are still around reading this thread are unlikely to be swayed by your tactics as they've weathered the storm per se and can see that you clearly have a specific perspective you're trying to sell. And no ones biting.

So move along now. There has to be something else you'd rather do with your life. All you have is now, you hear?




Really well said copy paste this for reference in the future to reply to fartyrdkjkjwhatever
legendary
Activity: 1260
Merit: 1000

HAha!  You guys are SO CLASSY!

I don't love it that ANYONE lost money.  Seen XC lately?  It's down like 75% and do you see me gloating even though I've been calling this for months?  and had the hell persecuted out of me for it?


Your account is 7 weeks old. If you've been calling anything for months it would have been through one of your other accounts that you'd have done so.

Normally I'd agree that it's the message that counts and that marginalizing the messenger is to be avoided. In your case, however, the messenger is enhancing the message.

You're a sensationalist. You latch on to a few points and sensationalize the shit out of them, making them out to be something entirely different.

You take the truth and paint a picture over top of it.

Truth: XC premine has been depleted
Your enhancement: XC authors dumped the premine.

Truth: The XC team promised transparency regarding expenditure of the premine and the latest from Dan is that he still plans to release further details when time permits
Your enhancement: The XC team promised transparency twice and hasn't delivered and is ignoring questions about their promise to be transparent.

You care not about providing the truth or delivering a message. You care about spinning the truth in such a way that fits the message you'd like to have delivered.

You're wasting your time dribbling on about this. At this point those who are likely to have sold their XC/BLOCK and moved on after having well received your skewed messages are no longer here paying attention to you. Those who are still around reading this thread are unlikely to be swayed by your tactics as they've weathered the storm per se and can see that you clearly have a specific perspective you're trying to sell. And no ones biting.

So move along now. There has to be something else you'd rather do with your life. All you have is now, you hear?




Damn dude, DAMN........way to lay out the truth brother.......VERY well said post:-)
sr. member
Activity: 364
Merit: 250


Dude ... it doesn't matter if I'm running the spotniek account, the mchammer account, the jl777 account, the anonymint account and the theymos account.

it's the goddamn message that counts.  not the messenger.


If it was the message that counts, just 1 account would be enough to get your point accross, posting the same shit from various accounts just turns your message into pure FUD.

P.S, I happen to agree that I wouldn't wish to see anyone scammed, even you, though I really wish you would stop posting the same old crap in this thread day in and day out. Just post it in the fud thread.
legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
If you really believe you're telling the truth unicornfarts, why do you have to create loads of shill accounts to post it?

So you can create the effect that lots of people share your opinion?  Roll Eyes That's the REAL scam.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250

HAha!  You guys are SO CLASSY!

I don't love it that ANYONE lost money.  Seen XC lately?  It's down like 75% and do you see me gloating even though I've been calling this for months?  and had the hell persecuted out of me for it?


Your account is 7 weeks old. If you've been calling anything for months it would have been through one of your other accounts that you'd have done so.

Normally I'd agree that it's the message that counts and that marginalizing the messenger is to be avoided. In your case, however, the messenger is enhancing the message.

You're a sensationalist. You latch on to a few points and sensationalize the shit out of them, making them out to be something entirely different.

You take the truth and paint a picture over top of it.

Truth: XC premine has been depleted
Your enhancement: XC authors dumped the premine.

Truth: The XC team promised transparency regarding expenditure of the premine and the latest from Dan is that he still plans to release further details when time permits
Your enhancement: The XC team promised transparency twice and hasn't delivered and is ignoring questions about their promise to be transparent.

You care not about providing the truth or delivering a message. You care about spinning the truth in such a way that fits the message you'd like to have delivered.

You're wasting your time dribbling on about this. At this point those who are likely to have sold their XC/BLOCK and moved on after having well received your skewed messages are no longer here paying attention to you. Those who are still around reading this thread are unlikely to be swayed by your tactics as they've weathered the storm per se and can see that you clearly have a specific perspective you're trying to sell. And no ones biting.

So move along now. There has to be something else you'd rather do with your life. All you have is now, you hear?


legendary
Activity: 1344
Merit: 1001
Mad?  Na I'm not mad bro.

Slightly irritated at how many whack a moles it takes to keep noobs up to date on how bad the scam you guys are running (promising to talk about how you spent previous funds, not delivering, asking for more money etc etc etc)

So many shill accounts that just bury you by saying FUD instead of a legit response it is a little tiring.

But I didn't lose any personal money so I ain't mad.

Dude everyone knows about all your shill accounts on here. You have no credibility.

If nothing is delivered in the next 6 months feel free to bash the project. In the meantime, stfu. Kiss
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
So glad you lost thousands to JasinLee's project btw, couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Smiley

Well, that's a terrible attitude to have man.  No matter what your opinion is of Dan's detractors, you should never lower yourself to this level.  Even Dan would probably tell you that JasinLee has done some shady things, so it's probably not appropriate to condone this kind of behavior from someone that was once associated with XC.

Just my 2 cents.

Erm, you're welcome to your opinion but this is a guy who literally spends hours a week using multiple accounts trying to sabotage genuine projects over something that has nothing to do with him being 'scammed'. His whole motive here is for projects that I, and you, have a vested interest in failing and he's trying to contribute to them failing. So yeah, if there's anyone here who deserves to be scammed it's him. And I haven't condoned what JasinLee has allegedly done.

Just my 2 cents.
hero member
Activity: 644
Merit: 500
So glad you lost thousands to JasinLee's project btw, couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Smiley

Well, that's a terrible attitude to have man.  No matter what your opinion is of Dan's detractors, you should never lower yourself to this level.  Even Dan would probably tell you that JasinLee has done some shady things, so it's probably not appropriate to condone this kind of behavior from someone that was once associated with XC. You can do better.

Just my 2 cents.
sr. member
Activity: 462
Merit: 250
My life is so pathetic, trolling like a broken record makes me whole again. Where's my pacifier?


newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0
Mad?  Na I'm not mad bro.

Slightly irritated at how many whack a moles it takes to keep noobs up to date on how bad the scam you guys are running (promising to talk about how you spent previous funds, not delivering, asking for more money etc etc etc)

So many shill accounts that just bury you by saying FUD instead of a legit response it is a little tiring.

But I didn't lose any personal money so I ain't mad.

Oh the irony of you mentioning shill accounts. It still blows my mind how people spend their spare time, or in your case hours a week, posting in threads they have absolutely NO vested interest in. Just little bored neckbeards in their basement with nothing better to do with their lives I presume. Anyway, no point continuing to waste my time responding to you; just lets you succeed in derailing this thread. I'll let Synechist come in and clean up this thread later. So glad you lost thousands to JasinLee's project btw, couldn't happen to a nicer guy. Smiley
newbie
Activity: 56
Merit: 0

Hello all,

just wanted to provide an update, due to the amount of noise from the trolls creating FUD to lower the market price, its hard to communicate directly with real blocknet enthusiasts.

As I stated, we will have a test/prototype p2p daemon by the end of the month, if not sooner and with that a clear roadmap and other details regarding this project.

While things may seem to be in a lull currently, it is just part of the process of putting everything in order


I'm available via PM for any questions as its hard to keep up w/ all the noise from trolls.


Dan


You mad? Yeah, you mad.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
https://github.com/atcsecure/xbridge

"6 commits" and "authored 12 days ago".  They are sure hard at work...

Can't say no one has been warned.

Looking back at your most recent messages:

ReplyReply  Reply with quoteQuote  Notify of repliesNotify
6    Other / Marketplace (Altcoins) / Re: [ANN] SuperNET asset 12071612744977229797, trading symbol UNITY   on: November 12, 2014, 04:12:10
Beginning of 2015 will be an amazing time for SuperNET.  Looking forward to it.
full member
Activity: 196
Merit: 100
Fibre Knight
https://github.com/atcsecure/xbridge

"6 commits" and "authored 12 days ago".  They are sure hard at work...

Can't say no one has been warned.


Thanks for protecting us, much appreciated. While you're at it, please go protect your other coins Wink

Jump to: