Topic: [ANN][EMC2] Einsteinium | FUNDING THE FUTURE WITH THE FUTURE OF CURRENCY - page 281. (Read 1076368 times)

Or some people just like to troll or fud coins. I know such types.

Dude, we know you know how to drive EMC2 values down, and run off good EMC2 community members -- you proved it numerous time. 

Anybody could artificially depress the value of a low volume coin, there's no genius in that.  Eventually, the panicked sellers are going to ask: "what's wrong", and we'll let them know it's just Ryan's gang up to their same old tricks.

Your maliciously conspiracy to depress the value of EMC2 yet again is another example of why your selfish and irresponsible behavior should not have been trusted with any fiduciary responsibility whatsoever.

Apparently the biggest cock in the room couldn't even accept some help at all. I looked through quite a few posts and what saw was a WHOLE LOT of NOTHING being done. So in the time that you said he posted the wallet 1st until yesterday when he posted it again absolutely jack shit got done. Seriously if you can't get the job done step out of the way and let others help or ride this shit down to 30 satoshies. 

Here's a detailed guide: http://portforward.com/

Port: 41879

Good luck!

The conf file was named correctly and I excluded the files on my antivirus. Unfortunately it's still stuck at 0 active connections. How would I port forward? Which port(s) should I use?

Ok, what did you call your .conf file exactly? Make sure it is named einsteinium.conf, & delete your peers.dat file, then relaunch the client. It should connect. If not, you may need to try port forwarding on your router. Also check to make sure your AV program isn't blocking it.

did you tried without the .conf file?

Yes. I deleted everything multiple times and ran the wallet again. I put the conf file where the wallet.dat is located. Still 0 active connections but it says 35 weeks behind.

Latest wallet software workind and finished is the v1.1 you can get the link in the OP.

as for the connection problem, did you try to delete your folder and run the wallet again?

I tried it and it's still at 0 active network connections...
http://puu.sh/co5uU/75755b8d8f.png

Look at this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.9145017

Edit: and be sure, you have the latest wallet Software!

I would like to mine Einsteinium but the wallet is not letting me sync. I am stuck at 35 weeks behind. I have also tried to delete all the files in the AppData regarding Einsteinium in hopes of the wallet to sync but no luck. I also tried to follow their instructions on the site but I don't know what to type on the conf file. I'd like to join the irc channel as well but it is invite only. How may I get invited?

Can anyone help me out? Any help would be greatly appreciated.

Unfamiliar account with no past documented history of EMC2 involvement speaking so eloquently of a time that precedes his own existence, interesting.


I have some vital questions for you:

1a)  What was the highest and lowest (full range) of EMC2 documented value during which the person you speak of 'helped create the EMC2 community'?
1b)  What was the average trade volume during that time?
1c)  What was the population of the community during that time?

2a)  When was it that that original development team disbanded, and how was that done?  
2b)  In what capacity was the person you speak of working on the team?
2c)  In what way was the person you speak of acquire his position: election, appointment, birthright... ?

3a)  What was the average market value for EMC2 at the time of the start of the "1 person board"?
3b)  What was the avg trade volume at the start of that administration.
3c)  What was the population of the EMC2 community at the start of the new administration?
4c)  What was the stated goals articulated by the new administration?

5a)  List all of the promises that were made by that administrator during his full administration
5b)  List all of the kept promises.

6a)  List all of the events that made you proud he was leading the ship
6b)  List all of the situation that originated in that administration that you feel should be duplicated in any other administration

7)  List all of the times the community offered to volunteer assistance,  
  
8a)  List the number of times he was asked to step down. resign, or otherwise remove himself from leadership.
8b)  What was the lowest value of EMC2 during his administration?
8c)  What was the lowest avg trade volume during his administration?
8d)  What was the population of the community at the time of his resignation?
8e)  What was the moral of the community at that time

9)  List the accomplishments of that administration

If you answer the above, you will have the answer to #10

10)  Why did that administration fail?

Maybe because it's the same wallet he released when he left the coin. It was unfinished and not worth releasing to the community until its finished or improved.

There's a lot of talk about a simple wallet release and a notice from the foundation to detach itself from this release.

I find it odd that some made a wallet that has been checked to see if its any kind of malware and its not get trashed for trying to help and support this coin. He used to dev it so its not like some newbi account posted it. It works and looks nice. It was some help to a community that he helped create. Review it and release it as official with a credit to him. It's Easy. Why the dick wagging contest. Surely you largest cock in the room can handle that. After all if you dick is so big and swinging you have nothing to worry about. 

Leave it already.

It was the right thing to do to advice that it was not endorsed by the official "governing body". Anything that can clear up possible confusion shouldn't be frowned upon.

Also, the exact suggestion you make is exactly what happened. It should be tested first? In the posts you try to argue agaisnt, it is stated that it was tested and deemed unfit. Which is also a decent piece of information that was transmitted to us. And the fact A source was released does not guarantee the binary isn't infected. Call me crazy, but I'd rather get my software through what stands as the official route. You seem to have a problem with what is considered official at this point, but you try to bash it both ways. " why trust them" and then "its wrong that you send a trusted warning".

Alphi, in your first message for the day you tell us that 'nobody needs permission ... from any dictatorship,' now in the message above you are trying to dictate the terms under which we can speak: "you did not have to add all that suggestion that ..." and how I should act: "so please stop acting like ...".   what's wrong with you? 

You are clearly off your game today.

We want the best for the community and the coins, the statement was to detach the foundation from the release ahumanbeingx did. As simple as that since he was the lead of the foundation before september, what he says/do in this thread can still be misinterpreted.

The wallet is unfinished, that's why i asked ahumanbeingx to release the source code to the community, so one members or more could work to finish it or even improve it.

Anything done for einsteinium is welcomed and when we are aware of it, we will give it exposure.
If you need help with anything, we will gladly help with anything we can provide.
If you want to release a software for einsteinium you are free to do it, we won't stop you.

You are a member of this community and anything you do for the good of this community is welcomed.

it could be a trojan even if it was released by the new einsteinium foundation too that is my point.. trust and respect are earnt over time not proclaimed.

ahumanbeingx has been around for longer and did hand over control willingly to the new team so to suggest that he is less trustworthy or trying to mislead people into downloading trojans without evidence is just being petty IMO.

its the divisive tone of the posts which concern me.. this coin and community is small enough as it is without people going on some kind of power struggle trying to break it up even further by casting aspersions on to people from the previous management team.

if someone has done something wrong then fine call it for what it is.
if the software doesn't work properly then fine say so.. if it hasn't been tested then fine say that too.. but hitting people over the head for not dotting their I's and crossing their T's when they appear to be trying to help out is a bit excessive is it not?

i have heard this several times that ahumanbeingx has been misleading about one thing or another.. is there any evidence for all these claims or are they simply excuses for why things haven't been done?

It appears that someone has just released and updated version of some new software.. wouldn't it be more constructive to organise people to evaluate and test it to see if it benefits the community rather than to make it sound like the software should not be trusted? after all the source code was provided so people can see if it has any trojans or back doors built in.

the reason I'm asking is because I want to make software for einsteinium too but I don't want to be accused of being misleading just because I didn't seek official approval from the self appointed governing body.

armis if it was a simple disclaimer then I wouldn't have a problem with it as I very clearly said.. but it reads more like a proclamation than a disclaimer. you did not have to add all that suggestion that ahumanbeingx was trying to usurp your authority. Anyone who has been with this coin for a while knows that he handed all authority to you guys willingly so please stop acting like there is some kind of power struggle going on..