Yes we are aware that ahumanbeingx introduced a new wallet and that it appears to represent official capacity. No, it is not authorized, no, it is not officially recognized, and no, we do not know why he would misrepresent the wallet in that way.
For clarification, the Einsteinium.org domain is not owned or controlled by the Einsteinium Foundation it is privately owned. The Einsteinium Foundation has officially treated the domain and site with the utmost respect by recognizing it as Einsteinium's official domain, however it broke common protocol by hosting ahumanbeingx's unauthorized material.
Although ahumanbeingx has the right to submit any wallet he wishes directly to the EMC2 community, it breaks common protocol to do so. Furthermore, to do the release in such a way as to give the appearance of official capacity where there was none is very disturbing.
Should you choose to use the "Einsteinium wallet" put before you by ahumanbeingx it is with the full knowledge that it is unofficial, unauthorized, and delivered with misrepresented capacity.
what is this drivel?
nobody needs official sanction from the einsteinium foundation to release their own software for the network.
crypto coin networks run solely on the distributed consensus model not by some quasi authoritarian dictatorship.
people do use and will continue to use whatever wallet software they want for whatever coin.. and it is the majority dictates which way the network will go.
with that in mind.. I really don't see the point of the above post.
You said: "nobody needs official sanction from the einsteinium foundation to release their own software for the network."
We said: "Although ahumanbeingx has the right to submit any wallet he wishes directly to the EMC2 community,"
what part of that don't you understand?
The fact is he didn't do so under his OWN heading, had he done so that would be a totally different story. We would not have to disclaim anything.
It looks to me the guy simply has an issue with comprehension.