Topic: [ANN][ICO] Cube - Security Platform for Autonomous Vehicle - page 14. (Read 8337 times)

Wow that is ultra shady.. I invested a small amount in the reservation sale and will watch closely.  Plagiarism seems to be more common in many countries, and the language barrier could further explain this attitude a bit (just look at TRON). However, I hope the project will elaborate on those issues.

Thanks for the hints!

And the company has been incorporated the 7 November 2017

that's just sad

cheers indeed

We still collecting some information about this ICO to coordinate our actions but one of our friends mentioned another cool step from Cube team.
Cube team just replaced all links to their original white paper with their one pager. Nice move team.

Why this project is bad:

• their original white paper is copy paste from other papers
• they failed to provide any feedback on case with stolen white paper
• they are trying to hide old white paper and now have only three pages with project description
• they are selling token to US residents without SEC permission
• they used to have fake physical address
• from technical point of view their old white paper is bullshit which just includes cool buzz words

Since Cube team replaced real link to their white paper with link to one pager without any comments, here is a link to original one: http://docdro.id/9iFodFl

I don't know...
English level of involved personnel is pretty poor, this could justify the rip off of some other whitepaper.
could someone provide evidences that subject document is taken from someone else's work?

The project and potential scenario are interesting, all the brands shown in the webpage are top-class, it deserves a deeper analysis.

cheers

good project, good plan
But I have a question why the cube uses a unit of calculation on ETH, not any other state coin???

I have some positions in cryptocurrencies and was looking for some ICOs to invest. Cube ICO was looking promising and I spend some time to take a look on its white papper. I found that most white papper is just stolen from another papers. There a lot of ICOs nowadays, some of them looks suspicious but Cube ICO literally shocked me and I decided to register and share what I found.

Every my point you can check by yourself, I provided all links, you can conduct your own research if you want and just try to search for some parts of white papper using your favorite search engine. It is not important who publish this information - newbie with 2 posts or expert with thousands of posts as long as you can check every point by yourself.

Thank you for your input, while I hope you are terribly wrong. Would you, please, elaborate if you registered here and started posting just to bash this ICO? It's just you sound like a person who is not new to crypto AND who does his/her due diligence with ICOs.. How come you are newbie here with only 2 posts both of which are in this particular thread?
Thank you in advance.

Don't invest in this piece of crap. The simple fact that they claim Autonomous Vehicles are more easily hackable just shows they've got no clue what they're getting into - Autonomous vehicles are actually much less vulnerable to hacks compared to today's average modern car. Not only that, but fragmenting information that your vehicle downloads won't do shit, because at the end of they day what you're hacking is the vehicle's hardware/software, not the information being downloaded. By doing that, you can directly affect the received information instead of trying to catch it "mid-air".  
  
Also 90% of your white-paper is copy & paste from someone else's.
  
This is bogus. Don't touch this scam.

http://prntscr.com/hxr0bh
 

Thanks! Looks useful.


I believe that any paper can contain some similar terminology but when I can just copy text from your paper and found another paper with the same sentences - it looks super suspicious.

I continue my research about your original paper and found something great. Most of your whitepapper it is just copy paste from "BlockChain: A distributed solution to automotive security and privacy" with authors: Ali Dorri, Marco Steger, Salil S. Kanhere, Raja Jurdak. Noone from the authors list is part of your team.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00073

You just added more cool buzzwords from another fields which are not covered by mentioned paper to create more hype.

I am going to contact authors of all mentioned papers and we will coordinate our further actions.

At the same time I am not just good in using google search, I am monitoring most of new trends in ML and quantum computing and can say that some of your pictures just do not have any sense. My favorite one is picture with quantum channel.

Projects like yours eventually can just destroy the crypto currency market, will slow down potential progress from blockchain adoption and destroy people trust in ICO.

I will post more detailed review for your project on medium and use my channels to spread this knowledge.

Good luck.

I've studied your project, the idea is a great, strong team, I think that you will succeed in achieving success in this market.
in which countries will this work?

This Project is awesome!   I allready invested. It will be my biggest investion. I just wonder why you don't add some big exchanges? The most Crypto Guys with a lot of money are more on Binance, Bitfinex or at least Bittrex. I see it often in YouTube Videos of big crypto investors that they get recommended a coin by a viewer.. and most times if they check they see "oh its not on binance" for example so they dont buy.  I know some of the exchanges you wanna add your coin by hearing, but in my opinion, these exchanges are very small/ unknown with very few people.

To add more value to your token you should add binance or bitfinex. I hope this will happen in future.. the token will moon then for sure.

I'm very interested in the exact core members behind the project, please post the link, thank!

 

I added some CUBE, distribution is fast, this is link for token transfer https://ethplorer.io/address/0x650e285599d5c652cd408a911a547e82fda15571#ready
If you want to participate in this tier hurry, 95% are sold.


 

Your white paper is so amazing I just was forced to register on this forum and leave my comments here.
First, link to reddit is broken on your website. Second you use a lot of cool buzzwords in your white paper without providing any kind of prototype or any kind of detailed description.
Your CEO has a lot of experience in autonomous cars, ok, let me just try to google: https://www.google.com/search?q=XROAD. Most links are about some kind of Estonian information system, nice. I tried to google "XROAD autonomous vehicles" without any success. Could you share more details about this mysterious company?
GreenCar looks like big car sharing company in Korea. There is no good search results about their CEO on english web sites. I believe that there is some information on korean web.

White paper contains a lot of cool technologies mentioned and words used, let me just highlight my favorite parts.
Part titled "Deep Learning for Classification" is copy paste from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0155781. Is Mr Kang is part of your team?
Part started with "In practice, there may be information leakage of the message over time due.." is copy paster from http://web.eecs.umich.edu/~shiyy/mypapers/HuangS16_qchash.pdf. Are authors of this paper part of the team?
Part titled "Quantum hash functions and BlockChain" is some kind of usage of http://gva.noekeon.org/QCandSKD/QCandSKD-introduction.html

So back to times when I was studying in university, for work like your whitepaper I would get something like "please check your paper for plagiarism and see you with new paper back".

And your one pager is actually three pager.

Please do not invest into so bad prepared icos.

It sounds like an interesting project. I do not think you can go to the application part of the project. Such projects need more time. But perhaps it can lead because it is the first in its field. Everything depends on the team. We will see what they will do.