Topic: [ANN][ICO] Cube - Security Platform for Autonomous Vehicle - page 13. (Read 8337 times)
I am waiting for clarification too.
Use of AI in the idea sounds good.
Cube is a gold project that I see at https://www.coinschedule.com/ so far I observe gold projects always get more attention than on other projects and also token price can not be estimated. maybe it will also happen with this project. let alone the project is very good and enthused many people and the project also runs smoothly. I'm sure this project will be a great success.
I like your position about security. Will you use a smart contract with multi-signatures as LuckyToken, for example??
Hello members, I am new to this forum but have been in crypto since June 2017.
I just created my account to be a part of this conversation about CUBE. I am a tokenholder of this ICO but I am getting more and more concerned that this ICO is not what it looks like.
My first background check of this ICO started when I found it on Coinschedule. I checked everything about the names on their team and also found a company registration file based in the UK.
So far I was not concerned that the type of writing about the persons on their team wasn't that clear to be honest. But suddenly one action made me suspicious. On their website they removed their CEO
who's name was Philip Lee. This person who is also the creator of the YouTube account vanished. Another thing is the video of the CUBE ODT-device itself. Is someone actually able to read what the app is saying
in the video? I spoke to a friend who's a mechanic and he says the parameters and visual effects look cool but they are meaningless. Another thing is that this type of device actually exists and there are some which look nearly identical to the one shown in the video.
Going on to Linkedin, the site where you can find out about the persons on the team. Here I find no information about who's actually on the team. Take "Dr.-Ing. Thomas Hofmann" for instance, he does not show up on the Linkedin page of Cube Intelligence but he himself has a LinkedIn account. Same applies to Dr. Andreas Roggon and Jan-Philipp Jost.
I am not sure if I have overlooked it the first time but I am pretty sure that Information was edited or removed over time. The Blockchain Summit in Dubai 5 days ago showed no pictures of Cube but the one where is says "sponsors". I've been to their main page and there are lot's of speakers with their speach. If Cube was one of the top picks as they mentioned, where is the video then?
The bounty program makes great publicity for the project, I am only reading positive comments everywhere. Now that I see some of the members here commenting about suspicious behaviour, I am quiet unhappy to have contributed too quickly.
Could CubeIntelligence please clearify in detail about what I just mentioned. If they are legit they can use a minute to do a proper clarification and get out pictures of their physical appearence on the Dubai Blockchain Summit.
Bitcoinviking
I just created my account to be a part of this conversation about CUBE. I am a tokenholder of this ICO but I am getting more and more concerned that this ICO is not what it looks like.
My first background check of this ICO started when I found it on Coinschedule. I checked everything about the names on their team and also found a company registration file based in the UK.
So far I was not concerned that the type of writing about the persons on their team wasn't that clear to be honest. But suddenly one action made me suspicious. On their website they removed their CEO
who's name was Philip Lee. This person who is also the creator of the YouTube account vanished. Another thing is the video of the CUBE ODT-device itself. Is someone actually able to read what the app is saying
in the video? I spoke to a friend who's a mechanic and he says the parameters and visual effects look cool but they are meaningless. Another thing is that this type of device actually exists and there are some which look nearly identical to the one shown in the video.
Going on to Linkedin, the site where you can find out about the persons on the team. Here I find no information about who's actually on the team. Take "Dr.-Ing. Thomas Hofmann" for instance, he does not show up on the Linkedin page of Cube Intelligence but he himself has a LinkedIn account. Same applies to Dr. Andreas Roggon and Jan-Philipp Jost.
I am not sure if I have overlooked it the first time but I am pretty sure that Information was edited or removed over time. The Blockchain Summit in Dubai 5 days ago showed no pictures of Cube but the one where is says "sponsors". I've been to their main page and there are lot's of speakers with their speach. If Cube was one of the top picks as they mentioned, where is the video then?
The bounty program makes great publicity for the project, I am only reading positive comments everywhere. Now that I see some of the members here commenting about suspicious behaviour, I am quiet unhappy to have contributed too quickly.
Could CubeIntelligence please clearify in detail about what I just mentioned. If they are legit they can use a minute to do a proper clarification and get out pictures of their physical appearence on the Dubai Blockchain Summit.
Bitcoinviking
Inform that there were some problems at the signatures. If your signature is old and if you do not change your signature with the updated one, change it now. Because of that all people who use that signature, change it when you see that text. If there is a new signature to add, do not be fooled by this post. There is no problem. Good luck to everyone.
Hello, tell me please how much money we have raised on PRESALE?
Hello,
Thanks for your interest in Cube. currently all tokens for Reservation Sale are sold out.
The allocated tokens for Reservation Sale is 7,344,000 including 70% of bonus.
Thank you.
Best,
Cube Team
Hello, tell me please how much money we have raised on PRESALE?
We still collecting some information about this ICO to coordinate our actions but one of our friends mentioned another cool step from Cube team.
Cube team just replaced all links to their original white paper with their one pager. Nice move team.
Why this project is bad:
Since Cube team replaced real link to their white paper with link to one pager without any comments, here is a link to original one: http://docdro.id/9iFodFl
It is a commercial project, definitely team use different references in their work. Cube team just replaced all links to their original white paper with their one pager. Nice move team.
Why this project is bad:
- their original white paper is copy paste from other papers
- they failed to provide any feedback on case with stolen white paper
- they are trying to hide old white paper and now have only three pages with project description
- they are selling token to US residents without SEC permission
- they used to have fake physical address
- from technical point of view their old white paper is bullshit which just includes cool buzz words
Since Cube team replaced real link to their white paper with link to one pager without any comments, here is a link to original one: http://docdro.id/9iFodFl
And it is pre-sale, they should work on white paper and make it even better.
I invest a bit in first stage, and will add more on next stage if they continue good support for the project.
The idea is not new, but with a coin is a good idea, I hope to have time to participate in the bounty of the company of signatures. Good luck to the team
Very interested in this project and just started off by registering for the promotion on this thread so this is good for attracting attention for your offering of a brand new Security Platform for Autonomous Vehicle to the bitcoin community.
According to the Cube Website you made 300 million with XROAD and sold greencar for 300 million.
If I read your new whitepaper, it's written on one of the last pages, that it's possible that you sell cube someday in the future.
I hope you will think further and believe in the potential of the cryptomarket and that Cube can be someday one of the Top 50 Coins of coinmarketcap with a market cap of at least 10 billion.
I'm hardly invested in Cube and I believe in the concept and in your Company.
If you would sell Cube for 300 million like you did with your other companys, the coin price would just change from 0,48 USD at the ICO to 6,94 USD in a few years and thats it.
I calculated 300,000,000 M.Cap / 43,200,000 CUBE = 6,94 USD per Cube
I compared it with NEO to prove if my calculation makes sense.. 7,464,340,000 M.Cap / 65,000,000 NEO = 114,836 USD per NEO
so i think my calculation makes sense but im not sure how realistic my point of view is, because it seems that NEO is really big big big .. I hope that cube can be as big as NEO and reach such a price someday.. I pray for it :-)
If I read your new whitepaper, it's written on one of the last pages, that it's possible that you sell cube someday in the future.
I hope you will think further and believe in the potential of the cryptomarket and that Cube can be someday one of the Top 50 Coins of coinmarketcap with a market cap of at least 10 billion.
I'm hardly invested in Cube and I believe in the concept and in your Company.
If you would sell Cube for 300 million like you did with your other companys, the coin price would just change from 0,48 USD at the ICO to 6,94 USD in a few years and thats it.
I calculated 300,000,000 M.Cap / 43,200,000 CUBE = 6,94 USD per Cube
I compared it with NEO to prove if my calculation makes sense.. 7,464,340,000 M.Cap / 65,000,000 NEO = 114,836 USD per NEO
so i think my calculation makes sense but im not sure how realistic my point of view is, because it seems that NEO is really big big big .. I hope that cube can be as big as NEO and reach such a price someday.. I pray for it :-)
You use following paragraph in your updated whitepaper:
It is copy pasted from https://www.google.com/patents/US9816827. In general this patent does not look like similar with proposed by Cube technology but the idea of copying text from patens is even worse then just copying others science papers.
Quote
The range of V2V communications between vehicle communication systems may depend on the
wireless communication standards and protocols used, the transmission/reception hardware (e.g.,
transceivers, power sources, antennas), and other factors. Short-range V2V communications may
range from just a few feet to many miles, and different types of driving behaviours may be determined
depending on the range of the V2V communications. For example, V2V communications ranging only
a few feet may be sufficient for a driving analysis computing device in one vehicle to determine that
another vehicle is tailgating or cut-off the vehicle, whereas longer communications may allow the
device to determine additional types of driving behaviours (e.g., yielding, defensive avoidance, proper
response to a safety hazard, etc.)
wireless communication standards and protocols used, the transmission/reception hardware (e.g.,
transceivers, power sources, antennas), and other factors. Short-range V2V communications may
range from just a few feet to many miles, and different types of driving behaviours may be determined
depending on the range of the V2V communications. For example, V2V communications ranging only
a few feet may be sufficient for a driving analysis computing device in one vehicle to determine that
another vehicle is tailgating or cut-off the vehicle, whereas longer communications may allow the
device to determine additional types of driving behaviours (e.g., yielding, defensive avoidance, proper
response to a safety hazard, etc.)
It is copy pasted from https://www.google.com/patents/US9816827. In general this patent does not look like similar with proposed by Cube technology but the idea of copying text from patens is even worse then just copying others science papers.
This is a fake!!!! Also check their Website. They but Pictures of People from Daimler and Porsche. This is fake!!!
Daimler and Porsche have nothing at all to do with this Project. Also the old Whitepaper was copy paste and they replaced it with a new one.
You have been warned!
I have seen the pictures, I don't think a picture means an official partnership between. And they did not mentioned anything wrong Daimler and Porsche have nothing at all to do with this Project. Also the old Whitepaper was copy paste and they replaced it with a new one.
You have been warned!
New nice catch about your project. There are links to some mass media at footer of your web site. There are following links:
All four links contain the same press release and if you scroll to the end of this press release you can find something like:
We are looking forward to watch this video.
I will publish more detailed review on your updated white paper a little later. I at least can see that you removed most details of using quantum computing, why you did it? Was it just added to get more attention from investors and you are not going to use it?
It is corporate speech and your ratings on web sites where anyone in two steps can leave any rating is not a super strong indicators of quality of your ICO.
- http://www.nbc-2.com/story/36943223/cube-intelligence-to-launch-its-presales-on-cube-token-from-december-1st
- http://www.fox5vegas.com/story/36943223/cube-intelligence-to-launch-its-presales-on-cube-token-from-december-1st
- http://www.cbs8.com/story/36943223/cube-intelligence-to-launch-its-presales-on-cube-token-from-december-1st
- http://www.news9.com/story/36943223/cube-intelligence-to-launch-its-presales-on-cube-token-from-december-1st
All four links contain the same press release and if you scroll to the end of this press release you can find something like:
Please excuse the delay in our response - Our team has been away with our chairman, Dr. Lee, who was speaking on behalf of our project at the Dubai International Blockchain Summit. Dr.Lee presented, was selected to be part of the primary blockchain panel and was interviewed with various media in Dubai. We will be uploading the video as soon as we can.
We are looking forward to watch this video.
Your finding of our problem was really helpful to us. We found later that all of our citations were actually missing due to a change in formatting. We have added all of our original citations again. We appreciate you bringing the problematic text to our attention - we have revised these sections and have updated the whitepaper to increase clarity and provide more information on our project.
I will publish more detailed review on your updated white paper a little later. I at least can see that you removed most details of using quantum computing, why you did it? Was it just added to get more attention from investors and you are not going to use it?
We understand that contributors want to be certain about the projects they are funding and that, in being a fresh startup, our digital presence is just in its infancy. While we are new to the digital scene, we are honoured to have been reviewed positively on TrackICO.io, to be listed on CoinSchedule and to have a 4-star rating on ICO Bazaar. We are working hard to be transparent, to inform the public about our project and to create an open line of communication with our audience.
It is corporate speech and your ratings on web sites where anyone in two steps can leave any rating is not a super strong indicators of quality of your ICO.
This is a fake!!!! Also check their Website. They but Pictures of People from Daimler and Porsche. This is fake!!!
Daimler and Porsche have nothing at all to do with this Project. Also the old Whitepaper was copy paste and they replaced it with a new one.
You have been warned!
Daimler and Porsche have nothing at all to do with this Project. Also the old Whitepaper was copy paste and they replaced it with a new one.
You have been warned!
To learn more about our chairman Bong H. Lee, Ph. D, please visit: http://topclass.chosun.com/mobile/board/view.asp?tnu=200712100018&catecode=B
For information about Green Car, the car sharing service Dr. Lee established and sold, please visit: https://ko.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/그린카
And for information about XROAD's European brand, Tibo: https://www.pocket-lint.com/gadgets/reviews/68421-tibo-gps-navigation-multimedia-destinator
For information about Green Car, the car sharing service Dr. Lee established and sold, please visit: https://ko.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/그린카
And for information about XROAD's European brand, Tibo: https://www.pocket-lint.com/gadgets/reviews/68421-tibo-gps-navigation-multimedia-destinator
Thanks! Looks useful.
Quote
Please note that our white pages terminology uses jargon that is common in the industry. We have never knowingly copied phrases from other sites and our pages were created specifically for this project. We will be working on an updated white paper and will be releasing it soon with more information and a clearer vision of our project.
Please let us know if you have any other questions about the project - We're always happy to chat about our up-and-coming technology!
Please let us know if you have any other questions about the project - We're always happy to chat about our up-and-coming technology!
I believe that any paper can contain some similar terminology but when I can just copy text from your paper and found another paper with the same sentences - it looks super suspicious.
I continue my research about your original paper and found something great. Most of your whitepapper it is just copy paste from "BlockChain: A distributed solution to automotive security and privacy" with authors: Ali Dorri, Marco Steger, Salil S. Kanhere, Raja Jurdak. Noone from the authors list is part of your team.
https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.00073
You just added more cool buzzwords from another fields which are not covered by mentioned paper to create more hype.
I am going to contact authors of all mentioned papers and we will coordinate our further actions.
At the same time I am not just good in using google search, I am monitoring most of new trends in ML and quantum computing and can say that some of your pictures just do not have any sense. My favorite one is picture with quantum channel.
Projects like yours eventually can just destroy the crypto currency market, will slow down potential progress from blockchain adoption and destroy people trust in ICO.
I will post more detailed review for your project on medium and use my channels to spread this knowledge.
Good luck.
Please excuse the delay in our response - Our team has been away with our chairman, Dr. Lee, who was speaking on behalf of our project at the Dubai International Blockchain Summit. Dr.Lee presented, was selected to be part of the primary blockchain panel and was interviewed with various media in Dubai. We will be uploading the video as soon as we can.
Your finding of our problem was really helpful to us. We found later that all of our citations were actually missing due to a change in formatting. We have added all of our original citations again. We appreciate you bringing the problematic text to our attention - we have revised these sections and have updated the whitepaper to increase clarity and provide more information on our project.
We understand that contributors want to be certain about the projects they are funding and that, in being a fresh startup, our digital presence is just in its infancy. While we are new to the digital scene, we are honoured to have been reviewed positively on TrackICO.io, to be listed on CoinSchedule and to have a 4-star rating on ICO Bazaar. We are working hard to be transparent, to inform the public about our project and to create an open line of communication with our audience.
We hope you understand our eagerness to make this project a success! Thank you for helping to keep us honest and pressing us to improve our whitepaper.
The Cube Intelligence Team
We still collecting some information about this ICO to coordinate our actions but one of our friends mentioned another cool step from Cube team.
Cube team just replaced all links to their original white paper with their one pager. Nice move team.
Why this project is bad:
Since Cube team replaced real link to their white paper with link to one pager without any comments, here is a link to original one: http://docdro.id/9iFodFl
It is a commercial project, definitely team use different references in their work. Cube team just replaced all links to their original white paper with their one pager. Nice move team.
Why this project is bad:
- their original white paper is copy paste from other papers
- they failed to provide any feedback on case with stolen white paper
- they are trying to hide old white paper and now have only three pages with project description
- they are selling token to US residents without SEC permission
- they used to have fake physical address
- from technical point of view their old white paper is bullshit which just includes cool buzz words
Since Cube team replaced real link to their white paper with link to one pager without any comments, here is a link to original one: http://docdro.id/9iFodFl
And it is pre-sale, they should work on white paper and make it even better.
I invest a bit in first stage, and will add more on next stage if they continue good support for the project.
Recently, the price of eth is not very stable, pumps a lot than drop, I think the price has much relationship with your token sale details, including the token price and the hardcap, I just want to know if the dev team will consider this problem and have a proposal.
Jump to: