Topic: [ANN][The Original Multipool - Scrypt/SHA256/Scrypt-N/X11] multipool.us - page 201. (Read 424232 times)
July 20, 2013, 06:03:54 AM
I still has a proposal to add franco, bottlecaps and megacoin on multiport. They all seems to be good enough for mining.
July 20, 2013, 04:43:57 AM
hehe, I skimmed through a lot
just wanted a recent opinion
No issues with this pool that haven't been fixed in 4 hours or less (the ftc debacle is a pain for any ftc pool owner)
A lot has been done by flound1129, adding more coins, adding a EU next to a US server (or the other way around?), multiport mining,.....
No complaints here, i love the pool
finally, I have been trying to keep up with individual pools and was going crazy
July 20, 2013, 04:35:54 AM
hehe, I skimmed through a lot
just wanted a recent opinion
No issues with this pool that haven't been fixed in 4 hours or less (the ftc debacle is a pain for any ftc pool owner)
A lot has been done by flound1129, adding more coins, adding a EU next to a US server (or the other way around?), multiport mining,.....
No complaints here, i love the pool
July 20, 2013, 04:30:17 AM
Well just started mining here, has everyone gotten good results with multipool? 
Come on now.. you have to read the previous 81 pages to catch up with the story.
Otherwise I'll have to charge you for details.
T.
hehe, I skimmed through a lot
just wanted a recent opinion
July 20, 2013, 04:13:09 AM
Well just started mining here, has everyone gotten good results with multipool?
Come on now.. you have to read the previous 81 pages to catch up with the story.
Otherwise I'll have to charge you for details.
T.
July 20, 2013, 03:52:37 AM
Well just started mining here, has everyone gotten good results with multipool?
July 20, 2013, 02:00:09 AM
Hot wallet was close to empty. You should be able to withdraw shortly.
Oh of course. Thanks! 
July 20, 2013, 01:34:41 AM
What's with multiport reporting 1.45 profitability over last 24?
Hmm, this is interesting. Looks like there's a bug inserting negative profitability values into the db.
Code:
mysql> SELECT mining_scrypt,ftc,wdc,mnc,ltc,dgc,nvc,lky,arg,pxc from multiport.history where arg < 0;
+---------------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+----------+---------+
| mining_scrypt | ftc | wdc | mnc | ltc | dgc | nvc | lky | arg | pxc |
+---------------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+----------+---------+
| arg | 0 | 1.64618 | 1.1682 | 1.67758 | 2.24064 | 1.5048 | 0 | -1497.96 | 2.13 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.78643 | 1.0494 | 1.68789 | 2.15986 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -7.69393 | 2.19 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.79133 | 1.0494 | 1.68913 | 2.16656 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -7.69393 | 2.15645 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.79339 | 1.0494 | 1.68952 | 2.16846 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -7.69393 | 2.17685 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.7968 | 1.0494 | 1.6901 | 2.09953 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -7.69393 | 2.18152 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.79823 | 1.04206 | 1.69041 | 2.10111 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -7.69393 | 2.18373 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.78822 | 1.04196 | 1.68847 | 2.02584 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -11.0694 | 2.185 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.79056 | 1.04196 | 1.68896 | 2.02912 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -10.5673 | 2.18588 |
| mnc | 0 | 1.79459 | 3.06763 | 1.68954 | 2.03151 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -10.5673 | 2.1865 |
| mnc | 0 | 1.79594 | 3.06763 | 1.68979 | 2.10634 | 1.5246 | 1.4058 | -10.5673 | 2.18696 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.73426 | 1.42591 | 1.67796 | 2.12692 | 1.5246 | 1.4157 | -8.88535 | 3.90968 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.73669 | 1.42925 | 1.67869 | 2.13713 | 1.5246 | 1.4157 | -8.88535 | 3.91243 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.73995 | 1.43041 | 1.67922 | 2.14262 | 1.5246 | 1.4157 | -8.88535 | 3.91512 |
| pxc | 0 | 1.74178 | 1.43352 | 1.67978 | 2.14622 | 1.5246 | 1.4157 | -8.88535 | 3.91716 |
+---------------+-----+---------+---------+---------+---------+--------+--------+----------+---------+
14 rows in set (0.01 sec)
mysql> update history set arg=0 where arg<0;
Query OK, 14 rows affected (0.07 sec)
Rows matched: 14 Changed: 14 Warnings: 0
In reality it's that one ARG row with the -1497 that's killing it. Since the negative ARG values in the other rows wouldn't be use since we weren't mining it at the time. I set all the negative values to zero so it should be closer to accurate now.
July 20, 2013, 01:31:34 AM
I can't seem to withdraw any LTC? Other coins withdrew just fine.
No errors or any other messages.
No errors or any other messages.
Hot wallet was close to empty. You should be able to withdraw shortly.
July 20, 2013, 12:54:40 AM
I can't seem to withdraw any LTC? Other coins withdrew just fine.
No errors or any other messages.
No errors or any other messages.
July 20, 2013, 12:40:55 AM
Gotta love Phenixcoin. Great for gambling.
July 20, 2013, 12:39:13 AM
I have no idea how to run a pool so I wouldn't know.
July 20, 2013, 12:28:31 AM
And it still goes on? Man I think there's something wrong with this theory 
July 20, 2013, 12:19:10 AM
Sure, usually at least half an hour. It oscillates pretty weird and for both of my miners. And as stated already, no problems with Pool-X.
How long till share becomes obsolete? I used to have some stale shares, lowered expiry time to 100 seconds but no difference.
zepadee: makes me worry. But also the calculated round income and day income is lower than at Pool-X so there must be something in that, right? It was good a few days ago and it started to be really bad. Aprox. by the time also FTC stratum got problems.
Yeah the incomes were probably lowered by FTC as you mention, so nothing to worry about
July 20, 2013, 12:14:45 AM
What's with multiport reporting 1.45 profitability over last 24?
July 20, 2013, 12:08:57 AM
I had a great day in LTC!!! I think I'm making double what I was making at WML.
The site just keeps getting better n' better. I like pool stats starting with the current MP coin. And the profit summary is nice too.
BTW, my hash rate values are right on.
The site just keeps getting better n' better. I like pool stats starting with the current MP coin. And the profit summary is nice too.
BTW, my hash rate values are right on.
July 20, 2013, 12:06:20 AM
Pool shows me much lower hashrate than my miners.
It's a 10 minute average, are you waiting 15 minutes or so for it to become accurate?
Sure, usually at least half an hour. It oscillates pretty weird and for both of my miners. And as stated already, no problems with Pool-X.
How long till share becomes obsolete? I used to have some stale shares, lowered expiry time to 100 seconds but no difference.
zepadee: makes me worry. But also the calculated round income and day income is lower than at Pool-X so there must be something in that, right? It was good a few days ago and it started to be really bad. Aprox. by the time also FTC stratum got problems.
July 20, 2013, 12:04:33 AM
Pool shows me much lower hashrate than my miners.
I don't think coin shares are based on hashrate anyway.
July 19, 2013, 11:52:36 PM
Pool shows me much lower hashrate than my miners.
It's a 10 minute average, are you waiting 15 minutes or so for it to become accurate?
July 19, 2013, 11:43:03 PM
Nice job making the "Pool Stats" button display the coin you are currently mining 
Jump to: