Topic: [ANN][WAS][WeAreSatoshi] | X11 | Hybrid PoS/PoW | Trading on C-Cex.com - page 22. (Read 42601 times)
July 08, 2014, 11:50:31 AM
It will happen after block 517,200; which should be sometime tomorrow or possibly Thursday depending on how fast the blockchain runs.
July 08, 2014, 11:46:36 AM
Is there any update on when the swap will take place?
July 08, 2014, 10:25:53 AM
RT if you will - https://twitter.com/blbnguyen/status/486530713223565315
July 08, 2014, 09:42:28 AM
Vote is now up for the logo contest @ https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/artists-needed-01-btc-bounty-offered-for-winning-design-wearesatoshi-674774 . Please cast your vote so that we can choose the winner and send MrData/ACN the new logo. Which will be the best email address to send it to?
July 07, 2014, 02:41:36 PM
Hello
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector >, std::allocator > > > const&, bool)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
It looks like rpcalert.cpp is missing form the makefile you are using. If you add it in the same spot as rpcnet.cpp and the other rpc files it should compile.
Thank you for the info. Will give it a try.
July 07, 2014, 11:20:49 AM
5 pages and going strong for the Logo contest. Vote begins tomorrow morning. Can't wait for the new everything 
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/artists-needed-01-btc-bounty-offered-for-winning-design-wearesatoshi-674774
https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/artists-needed-01-btc-bounty-offered-for-winning-design-wearesatoshi-674774
July 06, 2014, 10:09:16 AM
Hello
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector >, std::allocator > > > const&, bool)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
It looks like rpcalert.cpp is missing form the makefile you are using. If you add it in the same spot as rpcnet.cpp and the other rpc files it should compile.
July 06, 2014, 08:07:06 AM
Hello
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector >, std::allocator > > > const&, bool)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
WeAreSatoshid builds and runs fine.
WeAreSatoshid getinfo
{
"version" : 89909,
"protocolversion" : 70002,
"walletversion" : 60000,
"balance" : 429.87431100,
"blocks" : 501709,
"timeoffset" : 0,
"connections" : 6,
"proxy" : "",
"difficulty" : 3044.95632391,
"testnet" : false,
"keypoololdest" : 1403978628,
"keypoolsize" : 100,
"paytxfee" : 0.00000000,
"unlocked_until" : 0,
"errors" : ""
}
July 06, 2014, 07:17:39 AM
Hello
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector >, std::allocator > > > const&, bool)'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
Looking forward to the coin update but https://github.com/WeAreSatoshi/WeAreSatoshi.git will not build on Archlinux.
I'm getting the following error and cannot submit an issue on github.
build/bitcoinrpc.o: In function `_GLOBAL__sub_I__Z12JSONRPCErroriRKSs':
bitcoinrpc.cpp:(.text.startup+0xd57): undefined reference to `sendalert(std::vector
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:311: recipe for target 'WeAreSatoshi-qt' failed
make: *** [WeAreSatoshi-qt] Error 1
The previous commit had no issues.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
"Change is the only constant." -Heraclitus
July 05, 2014, 12:21:54 AM
OK, here's my concern. If there is 0 volume at 1 satoshi as it is. How will reducing the coin supply make it all of a sudden worth 100 sats. That is what would need to happen or else we would all be losing all of our value.
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
You cant loose 99
5 of nothing. That is what it is right now. There are no guarantees this will work but it is a change that might help this coin. Others have had a few months to try and do something for this coin and they did nothing. Someone finally stepped up so we might as well let them try.
In theory, no one is losing any money. It is an overall reduction in the total supply of coins, spread evenly across the entire network. If WAS was a company, you would still own the same percentage of the company.
I pointed out in a prior post the current value of WAS, if you figure it from the WAS / DOGE market, and convert that to BTC... Using that as a starting point, I think as-is, we will see an opening price of WAS 2 around ~10 satoshi. However, we don't know how the market will respond to a 15% increase in value from PoS. That will provide some level of demand in itself, as well as a reason for miners and bag holders to hold instead of dump.
Finally, as far as demand / environmentals, we did a 2% pre-mine so that we can provide bounties and fund development. This isn't our personal money supply, it belongs to the coin and will be invested in a thriving community.
July 04, 2014, 11:51:09 PM
OK, here's my concern. If there is 0 volume at 1 satoshi as it is. How will reducing the coin supply make it all of a sudden worth 100 sats. That is what would need to happen or else we would all be losing all of our value.
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
You cant lose 99
5 of nothing. That is what it is right now. There are no guarantees this will work but it is a change that might help this coin. Others have had a few months to try and do something for this coin and they did nothing. Someone finally stepped up so we might as well let them try.
July 04, 2014, 09:00:57 PM
OK, here's my concern. If there is 0 volume at 1 satoshi as it is. How will reducing the coin supply make it all of a sudden worth 100 sats. That is what would need to happen or else we would all be losing all of our value.
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
If we reduce coin supply and there is still no volume what makes you so sure that this will make it rise above 1 sat? If this doesnt work we all just lost like 99% of our money
July 04, 2014, 08:51:34 PM
Why did you rewrite the code? I am a big holder of the REAL #WAS and I am not happy you have taken over MrBrew's coin and made all old coins worthless. Its clearly all part of a scheme to make a buck off people who believe in your fake WAS takeover.
you are a moron.the coins are worthless because WAS is doing nothing.now they might be worth something. July 04, 2014, 08:40:07 PM
Whats the purpose behind changing the algo? 
July 04, 2014, 06:31:29 PM
Sweet! These are exciting times! I was worried this coin was going to perish. It was having a lot of trouble getting the backing it needed. I'm very excited and am 100% supportive of the changes. Changing the algo and turning it into a PoW/PoS coin will do nothing but good things. People will want to hold the coin for longer.
The biggest problem with the WAS v1 is the ability to absolutely flood the market.
Keep up the great work guys!
The biggest problem with the WAS v1 is the ability to absolutely flood the market.
Keep up the great work guys!
July 04, 2014, 05:48:06 PM
Are there more details on he switch to x11? What will the new total coins be? mining reward?
It will be just like in this post: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.7610238
July 04, 2014, 05:26:47 PM
Are there more details on he switch to x11? What will the new total coins be? mining reward?
July 04, 2014, 11:52:33 AM
Updated wallet and everything works. Keep up the great work. I know you guys are pretty busy but would you guys be able to get a multipool going so all the original miners with only sha miners can still mine this coin?
July 04, 2014, 11:15:23 AM
Got some really good logos going at my thread. We could use some more feedback and suggestions.
full member
Activity: 224
Merit: 100
"Change is the only constant." -Heraclitus
July 04, 2014, 10:56:29 AM
When i the swap?
Do i have to get new wallet first?
Please update on OP clearly how to do it please.
Do i have to get new wallet first?
Please update on OP clearly how to do it please.
Step 1 - Download the new v1 SHA256D WAS client ASAP. This will ensure that your version 1 WAS coins can be swapped for v2 coins. Follow the links on the OP and at http://www.was.club to download the new client.
Step 2 - When it is released, download the v2 WAS client (X11) and follow the instructions to participate in the coin swap. The exact details will be coming, but you will simply send coins to a designated address and use the transaction comment field to enter your v2 wallet address.
Jump to: