If there anybody should attack something, then they should attack dev's finite product and the dev himself not the community.
The attacks were against a plan to develop something and against a totally non tech community.
So the chandran signatures opened the way for others to attack the community.
Anyone who had something to talk about chandran signatures could have PM the dev and discuss.
Also without consulting the dev, that guy went to Andytoshi who had no idea for what he's answers are going to be used, and after he got what he wanted he came back to our community and spammed the forum for few days with the screenshot of the conversation, until most dumped their investment.
So this is what actually erok said.
So you tell me. How on the earth could and can the community of Stealth answer questions about tech things like chandran signatures, or anything else like it? And why anyone should come and ask us or debate with us the in-depth technology of the coin, when only the dev can answer that ?
Perhaps it was because the community here was constantly chanting Chandran Signatures at every turn. One would think that if a community member was promoting these chandran signatures, they would at least have a fundamental understanding of them. The failure here is not the FUD, nor the pump and dumps, but of a community who accepted whatever a dev told them and shouted down anyone who questioned otherwise. If you are going to invest money in something, it would be wise to do your due diligence and ask the hard questions so that you understand exactly what you are investing in.
It is unfortunate it took the past week's ugliness to bring us to this point, but this community has not created a conducive environment for rational, technical discussions. Hondo has posted a rather humble and much needed 'state of affairs' update, he should be commended for his frankness, even it was late to need. Hopefully he can get the necessary guidance and support to help fulfill his goals.
Still ...is not excuse for posting on somebody else thread few hundred times your opinion about the technology of a coin. You are missing the point...big time.
I bet you wouldn't do that. Still you are somehow defending them and motivate their action penalizing our enthusiasm.
It is like any time your dev is announcing a new feature, I should come on to your community and write few hundred posts telling you that you are wrong to believe your dev, and blame you for not being a tech person and not understanding fundamental rules.
C'mon! I can see that you are a decent person. Think again.
If I truly believe that something might be wrong with your coin, I'll take that with your dev. I will not shatter your hopes and believes and cause your price to drop, for the simple fact that I have empathy and I'm in the same boat with you, and moreover because I'm not certain that what I believe is true, and is wrong to dump it on the community.