Maybe it is not right to blame managers in ICO faults because the final decision is up to the ICO team and they can change it any time.
But in my opinion it would be better if there will be kinda table of ranks where everybody can see all works of managers(and manager associations) and the percentage of succesful projects and scams that were managed by these managers.
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? (Read 5969 times)
It is unfair to accuse the bounty of the bench.Very often they do more work than any bounty hunter . They also do not get paid for Scam projects, they are also deceived ,but they do a very big work
It was not to be the blame of the supervisor bounty, yet I figure this will make the awful notoriety of director since he deals with the bounty. furthermore, presumably numerous who accuse the chief despite the fact that it isn't the bounty being mindful.
No i think we can't blame the bounty manager because they just do their job, but the Bounty manager need to give us the proof so we can trust him hesn't the part of this project.
A good bounty manager from bad project makes a candy that will be bought by many investors. Before you get down to work, you need to analyze the success of the product on the market. And then already make a choice.
Yes, bounty managers to be blamed in case of scam project. I'm sure he/she knows or suspect it's a scam but still take the role of bounty manager for them.
bounty manager is often different from team. they dont deserve to be blamed by bounty hunter
i know it hurts get scammed by project. but we must be rational
I agree. It's like blaming shop assistant for the quality of milk or bread in their shop. They are just selling stuff, and bounty managers are just managing the bounties and they can be decent people unlike the scamming developers.i know it hurts get scammed by project. but we must be rational
i hope in the future, there is no blaming to bounty manager again
In my opinion the bounty managers cannot be blamed because in the first place their job is to managed the bounty program not the project. The one who be blame is the team of the project because they are the one who work it.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Very often the bounty Manager cannot be sure that the project will not really deceive the participants. This is normal and not worth so treat those who simply works on creators. Contact about the problems you need to SEO. Only he is responsible for this.
Sometimes we think who can we blame when our bounty is getting fail.
But, we need to know that project is fail and what can bounty manager do, it is nothing.
Just it.
But, we need to know that project is fail and what can bounty manager do, it is nothing.
Just it.
With deception in the bounty, each of us faces and this topic is even more common than the benches ICO. The main problem in the bounty
in managers who completely ignore any treatment
in managers who completely ignore any treatment
Of course I think some of the guilt is still there ! bounty Manager chooses projects in which he is paid and he must check that offers his followers!
When managers see fraud is detected should be finish working with ICO. When if this does not happen, you should punish the manager.
It depends. I think some bounty managers are aware of what their projects really are, and some don't. But of course initially bounty manager can't be guilty.
There is no prove to blame bounty managers for discrepancies in an ongoing bounty. Most bounty managers do allocate stakes and check for the correct compliance to rules and regulations but they don't share tokens.
At least bounty manager indeed must be responsible. Especially if the project has been promoted by many bounty hunter because the task given by bounty manager. I think to be a bounty manager should have at least the capacity and knowledge to know which projects are scam. too many new bounty managers are arriving out of nowhere
Bounty manager in most cases is the person who is not involved in the project. So when the project decides that they will not pay bounties, then bounty manager cant do anything 
.
Sometimes we can blame bounty managers most times more especially when they are members of the project but those who are hired we can't blame them they were only hired to do their job that's my own opinion
In most cases, it's really true, and bounty managers can or should be responsible for their actions, despite the fact that today they allegedly also bear losses, but they in most cases take their award to the BTC, how do you like that?
Do not blame the bounty managers. Maybe he's just like a bounty hunter being tricked by an ICO project. and partly because the bounty hunters did not know how to select research the bonus campaign before joining.
Yah. Sometimes it's not the fault of the bounty manager. Those projects deceived them, and they put a lot of effort into the management.
If the Bounty Manager is still knowingly helping the fraudsters to promote the project, then I think they should be condemned, but it doesn't seem to be the case at this time. Many managers have not received any return for fraudulent projects!
I agree, the manager is not to blame if he was just thrown as well as others. But if he continues to defend and defend such a project, then this is another conversation Jump to: