Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 18. (Read 5969 times)
Bounty managers are not to be blame by this situations because I think they are doing their job to handle that project , because as I read the platforms of this ICO bounty they are always good , but the things is do the customers and investors like or want their products or that kind of ICO are already launched in the past, so this might be the reason ICO failed to success, and bounty managers have no hold of it, but for bounty managers they ,should always be active on follow up ,what is wrong with the ICO , give immediately messages to what happen to the ICO project to the participants.
There are different situations, usually mostly bounty managers are not to blame for the fact that the project was bad
all are not wrong bounty managers, because everyone wants success. even if the ICO fails, the bounty manager also suffers a loss, because he has done his job and eventually experiences fraud like us.
there may be some bounty managers that cover up fraud done by ICO, but not all bounty managers like that.
there may be some bounty managers that cover up fraud done by ICO, but not all bounty managers like that.
Bounty manager cannot take responsibility for the misbehaviour and scamming attitude of any project. Bounty manages are there to conduct bounty campaign professionally and that is all they are responsible for.
Well i think bounty managers are not new on the crypto feild they know what their work is and how to work bounty as a manager. So then I think we cannot blame bounty managers maybe it is just because of the product or maybe people or investors didn't like the ico that is why it failed. There are so many factors that can make the ico failed so then we cannot put the blame on one person only .
I think it is a cross-sectional blame all on the part of the team behind the project, the bounty managers as well as the intended investors, it is actually expected that the bounty managers should know more about the ico so at the end most of the blames falls on them.
Bounty manager cannot take responsibility for the misbehaviour and scamming attitude of any project. Bounty manages are there to conduct bounty campaign professionally and that is all they are responsible for.
The manager can not determine at the outset of the project how bad or good the project is. Only in the middle he can understand whether he is collecting the necessary investments. And at this point he can draw conclusions about the actions of the developers of the project. Respectful attitude to the manager, who declares the failure of the project directly to all participants.
Bounty managers were not to be blamed even though if they know and understand the rate of the ICO distribution, the developers can change the rate of the percentage approved for the bounty campaign but i think its so ideal that the bounty managers know the people he or she is working with such that its integrity wouldn't be at stake.
You should never blame the bounty manager, especially if he is not from the team of the project itself. Even when ICO is a scam, the bounty manager fulfills his duties conscientiously. There are certainly isolated cases when this is not so, but this is a very big rarity. Unfortunately it turns out that companies choose their managers and the managers don't choose the companies.Sincerely yours.
Bounty managers can be blamed 100% but yes they are responsible for some portion of it...it is their resposibility to do proper research before accepting to manage their bounties..bounty manager is a big responsibility as lots of bounty members put thier time and work in it.
It a vice versa situation because some campaign or bounty manager lack the right procedure whenever they want to manage a project and this is why I respect Mr Yahoo62278 for the way he handle the campaign he managed and most of the project he handle are already on CMC doing well.
No, not at all, just think of it, do you think they will risk their name and reputation in this forum just to gain money? I don't think so, I guess they're a victim as well, though there are lots of Bounty Managers out there who do a lot of shady things and take advantage of the participants. We're partly to blame as well right?
Initially before we joined any campaign, we had to understand the risks and responsibilities. If such circumstances occur, we must first investigate both parties to balance our conclusions. I have also been a victim of several successful projects but changed their participants, be careful and be careful when you join any campaign.
I don't believe that bounty managers are to blame for that ICO can turn out to be fraudulent as they can't predict this. Bounty managers are only responsible for the bounty campaign.
I don't want to believe it everyone of them that was aware the program is a scam, because it is not everyone that knows the qualities of a good project.
Then, the project managers are not to be blamed because sometimes they also planned to have a good fund and did you check the profiles before investing in them?
Then, the project managers are not to be blamed because sometimes they also planned to have a good fund and did you check the profiles before investing in them?
This is a very difficult question and it is difficult to understand when the bounty manager has learned about possible problems with the legality of the project. There are projects on which you can immediately see that they are scam. In such cases, bounty managers should be fully responsible for working with them.
I also became a victim of the ICO, but I tried to think positively that the manager was not part of the developer. the manager is just not careful in choosing the ICO to be managed.
but if anyone investigates it further and turns out there is an indication of cooperation, then the manager should be blamed.
but if anyone investigates it further and turns out there is an indication of cooperation, then the manager should be blamed.
No, they shouldn't be blamed. They are just the one who manages the bounty, in other words, they are just monitoring,t
They do not give your stakes, you shouldn't be demanding on stakes thatt you'vw got.
They do not give your stakes, you shouldn't be demanding on stakes thatt you'vw got.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I vehemently do not agree that bounty managers were to be blame. Bounty Managers were just there to supervise or oversee that the bounty campaign was in order. I am truly convinced that even them had the slightest idea beforehand that the ICO they were handling was a scam. I once had an experience with an ICO that appeared to be a scam. The bounty manager was the one that advised all the bounty hunters to stopped from all our tasks because he had that strange feeling that it was really a fraud. He saved us totally from wasting our works. From that moment on, I am actually convinced that he is the best bounty manager this forum had ever had. I strongly believe that if we have to blame someone, it should have been their admins.
Note: manager also does their own research about project and only an inexperience manager will not do the right research about project before managing it.
If a project is unsuccessful, the bonus manager is not affected, as they only support the Bounty campaign. They are not involved in project development
Jump to: