Not entirely, because if you were to put your shoes to the bounty manager of the said campaign. You will notice that he is just starting his bounty managing career and most probably offered a low payment for the bounty of Uchit. Most ICOs takes advantage of this new camp managers because they will save a lot of money for the advertisement of their project.
Bounty hunters should also be held responsible for their mistakes trusting such campaigns without prior research.
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 14. (Read 5926 times)
they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers
all the work will have risks, including the bounty manager, if the distribution problem is not done, the bounty manager is also blamed by the participants, even though the Dev has not sent it to the bounty manager
You've said it all. They are to be blamed because they are a representative of the ICO project team. They get paid, at least to an extent, even before the campaign starts. They should take responsibility for any failed projects.
The managers are really not to blame because like you and me, they are just trying to earn some money too. They are going by what the creators of the projects give them and with that if the creators do not provide the coins for them to pay out the bounty rewards then there is nothing that the bounty managers can do about it. We need to cut them some slack, it is not their fault
Sometimes the managers don't do their job, if they don't count stakes then it's their fault for not helping.
they have nothing to blame because they have to set tasks that they have to fulfill and they do them, they can also be deceived by employers
I don't believe that the directors of abundance battles are at fault for the way that the undertaking was a Scam. Maybe the Manager was given enough time and assets was committed to the choice of the abundance crusades. Be that as it may, regularly chiefs likewise take part in the abundance battle, wear a mark and furthermore turn into a casualty of duplicity. Abundance members and administrators must be on a similar side.
The managers are really not to blame because like you and me, they are just trying to earn some money too. They are going by what the creators of the projects give them and with that if the creators do not provide the coins for them to pay out the bounty rewards then there is nothing that the bounty managers can do about it. We need to cut them some slack, it is not their fault
Of course not . The Manager can be as cheated as we are . In addition , there is a big difference if the Manager disappears and does not answer questions or simply apologizes that the project could not pay for one reason or another .This is a very important difference
Some bounty managers do not do their job correctly , updating the sheets or trying to find the scammers and so on, I saw many times some other people were using my articles as theirs, and I have reported this to the bounty managers, but they must do this immediately theirselves, what if I do not catch them and then lose my stakes
for me abundance supervisor shouldn't be fault on this if the bm are as yet dynamic and moving toward each and every inquiry on what occurred on the venture you ought to be all the more precising on this.. since this bm is likewise similar to abundance seekers that need to procure some benefit moreover. you should revile the group who extremely really working the ICO. on the off chance that that is happened you will figure out how to be more watchful on what task will you joined straightaway..
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I don't know about Uchit and also don't want to research about it now. But I think if the manager had apologized, it couldn't be a scam.There are many reason that make you cannot receive you reward, such as the project failed or it didn't reach the softcap. And these reasons are legal
To a certain extent, a lot of them seem to be obvious scams. They should get paid in tokens the same way the rest of us are.
Sooner or later extraordinary individuals will be fault for defaults in icos running from the group behind the venture up-to the abundance administrators. In spite of the fact that at the main idea the chiefs are to be faulted however it can likewise be shared among the distinctive individuals behind it. By the day's end their obligation is to lead, direct and co-ordinate the abundance so it is as yet their blame.
You cannot directly blame to bounty manager for scam. As far as my knowledge bounty manager is not the part of the project team he is just a mediator between company and the bounty hunters. His responsibility is only to check bounty hunter work and give them stakes as per company norms and also update any quirey of bounty hunter.in others wards you can say employee , how can he is responsible for blame. So it is bounty hunter responsibility to check everything before joining.
Perhaps Yes, it all depends on the situation . Manager bounty is exactly the same as we are, working for the highest award received from the project
Sometimes it is impossible to predict this from the beginning and unfortunately you can not do it every time and you get to be scammed. I wouldn't blame the bounty hunters anyway
ICO main way to attract potential buyers are through bounty, its just the nature of ICO in general, cant blame them.
More questions are on the project team, you are entitled to refuse and not participate but you choose to join. Manager Bounty is also responsible, so are you.
I think yes, because they are the ones who manage the bounty project.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
If the bounty manager is part of the team then he is partly to blame, but if he is an independent or third-party manager there's a chance that he did not know that the project is a scam, after all, we never know, maybe he already knows but because he wants to be paid in full he still go ahead. Jump to: