Bounty managers are not to be blamed only if they do contribute in the scam that is taking place and those ones are usually members of the team that launched the ICO at first place.
Even if you are not that implicated in the scam or you really didn't verify whether the ICO is a credible one by reading it's whitepaper , seeing whether they have an opportunity of making money and so on ..
I remember that lately a very known and trusted campaign manager have received numerous negative feed backs only because he knew that the campaign he is managing is a fraud , so the managers aren't really those to blame ..
Experienced enough bounty hunters can make the difference between a scam and the real deal and should alert people whenever they smell something fishy (which is already happening with a lot of ICOs ..) .
Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 21. (Read 5969 times)
Well even they are reputable bounty managers it is hard to predict the ICO projects are scam. We cannot blame them and accept that we are in the industry wherein there is no assurance of the projects. That is why we do bounty campaigns at our own risk and move on to the next project.
There are different situations when new projects are closed and lost at the ICO stage.
And in many new projects there is no official representative of the company, often hired bounty managers simply do not know what is happening in the project and are also deceived.
And in many new projects there is no official representative of the company, often hired bounty managers simply do not know what is happening in the project and are also deceived.
Although I think we shouldn't blame them so quickly, I also think that bounty managers have a bit of blame, many people participate on bounties that have responsible managers, because they feel confident with them, what happens is that it is very complicated to know that an ICO is a scam if done very well, you can find out if it's a scam if you look at the obvious things like the whitepaper, the roadmap or the team, but when all goes well and the project looks successful and the development team decides to run away with the money, how can you predict that? hard stuff
The bounty manager only publishes and manages the bounty. It is not responsible for project development and fund management. It can be said that he is only an intermediary between the project party and the bounty hunter and cannot be responsible for the authenticity of the project.
There's scam ICOs everywhere, I don't think all blame are for the bounty manager alone because the managers are only giving the bounty project as work to do, and if the team decided any stopped to the project it's will surely affects the bounty campaign.
But bounties manager should be conscious of bounty campaign they offered to them so as to protect there reputation.
But bounties manager should be conscious of bounty campaign they offered to them so as to protect there reputation.
Of course bounty managers should be held responsible. Afterall they are the one managing the campaign
They should be blamed only if they fail to fulfill their obligations and do not do their job.
They don't deserve the blame. If a bounty manager is doing his job with responsibility like keep updating bounty thread/tg group with latest news concerning bounty,calculate stakes accurately and most importantly take note of complaints and answer them politely then it's not always their fault if ICO turned out to be a scam.
we shouldnt blame these bounty managers because they are only in charge on the flow and the partcipants in rach ICO.Failing of ICO doesnt reflect the bounty managers but the failed of each participants to meet the requirements for each ICO should also considered.At the end of the day,bounty participants are the one who makes every ICO successful.
I don't figure the abundance supervisor should fault, abundance chief toward the start of a don't have the foggiest idea about the ICO is extortion, and now the market isn't great, there are various ventures have not achieved their caps, so ICO is considered by an abundance seeker is a trick.
The mistake of someone who has committed fraud against many people does make many people feel annoyed.
Maybe my advice is in the midst of the conditions of any ICO who are doing a scam, so we must be careful before joining the ICO because at this time following the ICO is quite risky because now many are doing scams and many ICO that do not meet the soft cap.
Make this incident a valuable event to avoid scam ICO.
Maybe my advice is in the midst of the conditions of any ICO who are doing a scam, so we must be careful before joining the ICO because at this time following the ICO is quite risky because now many are doing scams and many ICO that do not meet the soft cap.
Make this incident a valuable event to avoid scam ICO.
That's a pretty interesting question. On the one hand, the Manager must carefully check the company, and on the other hand, we check the company ourselves. And there's no point in blaming him, since he didn't know about the fraud either.
not entirely the fault of the manager but a manager should also be responsible that what he has promoted is not a fraudulent project or the project is unclear. besides that we also have to be observant in finding a bounty campaign
Bounty campaign managers aren't to blame if a project fails to raise enough funding in its crowdsale or if the project turns out to be a scam but it helps if they do due diligence and also if the funds for the campaign are escrowed in advance
The rest is up to the bounty hunters to ensure they're working with a reputable campaign manager and have researched the project themselves
The rest is up to the bounty hunters to ensure they're working with a reputable campaign manager and have researched the project themselves
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No, you can't blame the Bounty Managers. They are same as us. They can't detect which ICO is not a scam.
So, the only person you can blame is the team project.
I am of the opinion that before entering into any agreement with any ICO bounty manager / admin should first carefully study the project of the ICO. He must study about the team members' past record.
Future prospects of the project should be studied; only then he should enter into an agreement with the project.
If still it turns to scam; then we shall further think what efforts we can do to avoid such circumstances.
Future prospects of the project should be studied; only then he should enter into an agreement with the project.
If still it turns to scam; then we shall further think what efforts we can do to avoid such circumstances.
We do not blame the bounty manager because only they want is to become successful the project and all of us who work on it will be pay at the end.
I think no we can't blame on them because they also do what the developer said to them. If the bounty campaign is scam its all the fault of developer because he run away the bounty manager can't fight back because he already a worker too on a campaign.
I believe that managers are not to blame, often, many managers simply perform the assigned tasks..And they can also be deceived .. and do not pay for the work, although being a bounty manager, it's harder than being a bounty hunter.
Jump to: