Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 15. (Read 5926 times)
I think bounty manager and bounty hunters all have a little responsibility and can't completely blame the bounty manager. Of course, the premise is that the bounty manager doesn't know beforehand that this is a scam bounty compaign.
it appears to be now and again the blunder isn't from the abundance administrator however from the abundance group stage that can not be trusted so errors can occur from the two gatherings and nobody knows, there are a few chiefs work's identity great yet when the season of installment group from platfrom don't have any desire to do installment.
Participation in bounty campaigns does not give any guarantees. If the manager competently leads the company, and as a result, the participants did not receive payment, then it's silly to blame the bounty managers, because they can not know which project will turn out to be a scam.
Bounty managers may not be to blame, but I think people try to go to a more or less reliable managers..As an example, yahoo62278 , he does not have time to open a new bounty, as he has scored all limits, willing to join..this is what it says?
If big and trusted bounty teams like AmaZix and bountyhive sometimes are not able to detect scam projects, then I think a sole bounty manager can not be blamed so much for not identifying scam projects.
Agree. One manager has fewer opportunities to identify scam project. But even project is not a scam we often see exchange price like 0.2x from ico. And it's terrible.
Although this is not the full responsibility of the Bounty manager, the Bounty manager still has the responsibility, not the money to promote.
If big and trusted bounty teams like AmaZix and bountyhive sometimes are not able to detect scam projects, then I think a sole bounty manager can not be blamed so much for not identifying scam projects.
We don't need to blame bounty manager because like us they also victim of scam project. No one wants to be victim by scam but sometimes we can not avoid to join on scam project, so while you are looking for a bounty do your best to avoid joining scam ico.
I also know ico, indeed, if you see ico, it looks good because the sales of the tokens have already exceeded the soft cap, and the ico rating on ico's website is also good and the number of participants also supports ico to be a good ico, but in the end ico it's just a scam ico, but luckily I didn't participate in ico.
If big and trusted bounty teams like AmaZix and bountyhive sometimes are not able to detect scam projects, then I think a sole bounty manager can not be blamed so much for not identifying scam projects.
It's completely understandable that bounty hunters want to charge a set fee, but I think they need to be flexible and decide on a case-by-case basis. If the token is all that's being offered, it has to be a damn good ICO (one based on a product, not an idea).
Though they might not know if the project is going to be scam or not but they are still the one people will blame because they ought to have make proper research before introducing the project to their subscribers if they don't want to start losing peoples trust.
we cant blame them and at the same time some of the needs to be blamed for the scam or failure because they won't take their time to do proper research about the project before accepting it, they only think of the money they are making.
Definitely not, the bounty manager doesn't know a thing on what really happens. The bounty manager also is the employee to the team which is the employer. The bounty manager is totally the same to the bounty hunters.
The manager is undoubtedly the main person who knows the project from the inside. He is the first to notice the contradictions in the behavior of the development team. At the same time, if the manager cares about his future and his future career - he provides the participants with the necessary information as early as possible in order to avoid losing money from the participants.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO was known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
Bounty managing isn't easy so I think they are just doing their job. Some instances might cause some uncertain lapses but they aren't the one to blame because they have different jobs to do. In case the project didn't succeed I think it is not just the manager that is to blame but also the developers and creators of the project as well.
With due respect to your opinion. a project being unsuccessful or turn out to be complete scam(where bounty hunters didn't get paid for their work/effort) are 2 different scenarios. everyone agreed on that project success or failure doesn't depend on Bounty manager but Managers can take necessary steps so that he/she or any team can avoid scammy project's campaign.
I think they're stealing from us. That's fair. Previously, they caught up with their bots in the company and credited them with incredible ratings.
In my opinion, we should not blame bounty managers if ever there are irregularities in the campaign. Though as we see it, they are the ones facilitating the campaign but that does not mean that they should be blamed if ever the campaign was a flop. But just for a precautionary measure, before you join a campaign, see to it that spreadsheets are clean, organized, and the had spew reputation he keeps.
Bounty managers are only there to facilitate information and record in accurate manner the work been done by bounty hunters! Bounty manager can not take blame for failed project or scam ICO.
If we consider ico as an investment project, then of course the risks are present and they are also discussed with the bounty programs. In this case, there is no point in accusing someone, since this is obviously a risk. But there are times when managers, they know about the problems in ico and do not report it, in the result of the accusation against them I consider it quite reasonable, as they are obtained in a shog with the administrators of ico and cover them. In any case, if they want to deceive us, we will deceive and we will not be able to do anything.
If bounty managers are assistants to scammers, they should be blamed to the full. Suppose that if they spread false information, which will lead to a loss of funds and time.
Jump to: