Topic: Are bounty managers to be blamed? - page 23. (Read 5969 times)
Recently, our forum has become very much a scam, why bounty managers do not analyze projects? I heard that for their work they get a reward in BTC and hunters get in tokens. It is not right. Those who get into the BTC should be held accountable.
Bounty manager cannot be blamed when ICO fails or scams because it does not meet the softcap value.
Except Bounty Managers do cheating like distributing uneven tokens in spreadsheets like those that are intertwined with other participants.
Except Bounty Managers do cheating like distributing uneven tokens in spreadsheets like those that are intertwined with other participants.
We cant blame bounty manger directly.But he has responsibilities what he is going to promote.at least he must do research before start promoting project.
I think they can not be blamed if there are not much evidence to support the claim that they were part of the whole idea. The best we can do is to avoid participating in their subsequent bounties
Basically bounty managers are just the same like us bounty hunters. If we got scammed from an ICO projects, I bet they don't even know how they could explain their side from the hunters, they are victim as well.
maybe yes, maybe not it depend on the situation because bounty manager is just like us also working for the high reward given from the project. they are working in one team and yes BM are the responsible to answer the question of the bounty hunters but they do not own the project for them to blame of what gonna happen the project they are working too.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
No, you can't blame the Bounty Managers. They are same as us. They can't detect which ICO is not a scam.
So, the only person you can blame is the team project.
the project has sent the token for him, but he has no work of his that has scam the whole number of that token to do for his own benefit So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
They are responsible for the scams but in the first place, the very root of evil schemes would be the team who really started the project. They are the source of it all and must be held responsible.
Well they have the responsibility for the project so yes. I don't know why it is hard for them to somehow give a weekly or monthly update of what's happening in the projects and the tokens they promised in return of the jobs. Sometimes, they really give the people who invested their time in them the doubt which may lead to the "scam" idea. So please bounty managers, prove to us that the projects you are into and we invested into clearly deserve the right to become successful.
some bounty managers are very irresponsible because they accept all bounty campaign offers that they receive without first finding out whether the ico project really exists and trusted or not, so we must say thanks for the admin in this forum for giving negative trust to the bad bounty manager
At some point different people will be blame for defaults in icos ranging from the team behind the project up-to the bounty managers. Although at the first thought the managers are to be blamed but it can also be shared among the different people behind it. At the end of the day their responsibility is to lead, direct and co-ordinate the bounty so it is still their fault.
yes if they do not manage well in controlling and updating stock
I think part of the responsibility lies with the bounty managers! They take the projects and lead them , and they also check all the documents and the team , so they have responsibility!
Gift campaign managers cannot be part of the team at all from the start but only contract employees with them, who don't even need a direct (physical) meeting. Pay hunters also have some responsibilities, they must do research well before participating in the ICO.
It is already given that we as bounty hunters are responsible for whatever the outcome is however bounty managers also play a big role, they are the ones who know more what we know.
We've looked at each project, and then based on feelings and confidence, we joined the project and registered and the bounty manager always updated it, and we didn't know the project was a hoax, so that's our risk, and the manager couldn't provide any information about it because it was also hoaxed.
Gift campaign managers cannot be part of the team at all from the start but only contract employees with them, who don't even need a direct (physical) meeting. Pay hunters also have some responsibilities, they must do research well before participating in the ICO.
There are people who already know that this is a scam project. But why then they are silent (maybe because they are paid money)
Its not easy for hired bounty managers to predict if a project is scam they only perform their duties as hired managers but i can blame managers who are part of the team in that project they know all and they can tell if the project is a scam or not thanks
It is a big difference if the bounty manager was aware of the scam bounty or not. If he was aware and was misleading the
the hunters then Yes, he has to be blamed. But if he was not aware then he is a victim as well. Some ICOs doing their
scamming very professionally and it is almost impossible to discover their bad intentions.
the hunters then Yes, he has to be blamed. But if he was not aware then he is a victim as well. Some ICOs doing their
scamming very professionally and it is almost impossible to discover their bad intentions.
So ones again we have been scammed by another ICO known as Uchit. Now people have started raining insults and curses on the bounty manager that he has led them to be scammed. Despite the numerous apologies from the manager, bounty hunters do not seem to understand. Now my question is, do you think bounty hunters must be blamed when we are scammed because they knew what the ICO was up to, even from the beginning?
I think no. Bounty managers are also working in a certain ICO projects and it is not their fault if it will fail. Sometimes the failure is the project itself.
Jump to: