Topic: [BBR] Boolberry: Privacy and Security - Guaranteed Since 2014 - page 329. (Read 1210752 times)

no, I think he means to Cryptonite (XCN) 

CryptoNote yes syncs are really quick.

BBR is the fastest block syncing cryptonite coin

I'm good

Yeah I just told them : https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/m.8526283

Hey! SlyWax! Nice to see you! How you doing ?!

btw: cryptofolio.info wrote wrong algo, we not cryptonight, we wildkeccak

This is not an exchange, it's a portfolio but it would be cool to have BBR quoted.
Please vote : http://cryptofolio.info/welcome/vote
No need to login. 1 vote every hour.
We are on 2nd position today, yesterday we were 1st.

Send smaller amounts.

Me thinks that more attention should be given to this
https://bter.com/voting

Edit: this too: https://hitbtc.com/vote

seems they're saying that all the time 

Bittrex says we are at risk of delisting due to low volume and lack of interest.

I cannot send all my BBr in the wallet (using 0 Mixin). Error: Failed to send transaction: transaction is too big.
Any idea?

*shrugs*  Making a big deal of aliases is like pointing out that you don't like the color the tail of a new airplane is painted.  Sure, it's a completely valid complaint, but it perhaps it's not the major issue.

I actually like that aliases are one per block for now.  It seems like a reasonable way to start, a nifty feature to encourage miners, and a way to start exploring the concept.  It's obviously not the One True System For Everything, but you've got to start somewhere, and this provides an initial way to gain feedback and experience with the idea.  If nobody uses them or hates them for some reason, experiment done, rip them out, fin.  If the demand exceeds the # of blocks (which it certainly hasn't yet. :-), then add another mechanism for creating them.  It's not clear that such a change would even require a hardfork - there are many ways to add them such that they would propagate but only upgraded clients could send to them.  That's a pretty reasonable soft upgrade path.

To re-use one of my favorite sayings, from Voltaire:  The perfect is the enemy of the good (roughly, from "Dit que le mieux est l'ennemi du bien").

It's usually better to have something as a reasonable start up & running than to never release anything because it's not perfect.

But aliases are a relatively minor feature compared to some of the big features, so getting overly stuck on them seems not entirely profitable.

Now I've heard everything! DTS is giving constructive criticism!

As currently presented, the alias system needs improvement. The system not fully documented. It is not usable on pools yet. No one really seemed interested in the alias system until recently, so I never thought about much.

Happenning really great profit at bittrex

thank devs

sure I had restarted computer and router.

You are just nitpicking for the sake of it, Bitcoin is not at the level where 2 million unique addresses have balance in. Absolutely no reason why cryptonote based coin would get to that level anytime soon. And you know it well, otherwise you would be investing here for phenomenal returns. No sense at all to be wasting time in this now when the alias system is perfectly functional for today, and medium to long term future. CZ never was so naive to insinuate there would never be hardforks.




As stupid as it sounds, try simply stopping daemon and restart of your computer first.

It is ok to throw ideas out. Don't waste time in dissecting people and don't attack zoidberg as being stubborn or lacking vision. You have malicious intent trying to vilify the core developer and I don't want to defend a person either but I don't want this type of passive vilification slide. Last time I checked he has developed great features and launched a crypto.

Bitcoin doesn't even have that many public keys to date. There is little reason to worry about aliases running out. The current system makes sure it isn't abused as it has to be done via solving blocks.

Daemon can't connect to 54.*.*.* today, please help me some peer ip.

You're like the most defensive person ever.

I didn't say it was bad, I effectively said:

The alias system needs work, and instead of saying it is this way because of "vision" Zoidberg should instead work on making it better right now, especially because Zoidberg was earlier saying he wants all the tech in place asap because he is against hardforks.

So waiting for a while to fix the alias system is actually counter to Zoidberg's philosophy.

This is my first post that I actually tried to give some useful advice to Zoidberg, it's actually in my interest for Zoidberg to leave the alias system in the current state it is in.

IPv4 addresses ran out too. It doesn't mean it had no purpose. In due time, more than 2 million addresses can be accommodated, if there is demand for it down the road. Chains can evolve. For now this is a great feature that no other CN coin has and can serve well within its limitations. It should be appreciated, not dung-coated as something bad. I doubt bagholders who are dedicated to one coin world domination have any desire to see any success from any other coin.

The concern trolling from certain individuals brings out the stubbornness, if there is something like that, in Zoidberg. He knows the folks who have no interest in this project, but keep bringing up concocted problems and concerns about it, while silently hoping it all just goes away.