Pages:
Author

Topic: Bitfury: "16nm... sales to public start shortly" - page 48. (Read 108551 times)

hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 500
Does anyone know what the price of these new chips would be?
Get a mining calculator on the same day the ship is ship-able. Calculate the return the chip generates (at 100 GHash/s) per month with the NEXT (estimated) difficulty. Multiply that number by 8 (this is when it should break even). And there you have it ... the price of one chip.

Right now the cost would be:
Next est. Difficulty: 1.52542370411e+11
with 100 GH/s
per month: 0.01003473 BTC
multiplied by 8: 0.08027784 BTC total cost per chip (in a functioning miner ... PSU, housing etc. included) which currently results in 30.45 USD

Enjoy!

 
member
Activity: 99
Merit: 10
Does anyone know what the price of these new chips would be?
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

Quote
BTW - you STILL haven't addressed my question about how Bitmain (or whoever) is supposed to be competative to the 14/16nm gear after the halfing kills the profitability on anything less efficient.


Every time i see something about the halfing and how bad it will be. I LMAO . then think how does anyone know for sure. The answer is you don't unless your god, i don't see how it going to bad other then 12.5 less coins and the chip makers will adjust and in four more years it happen again, if bitcoins are still here.

I try my best not to comment on anything i see that looks negative but from time to time you can't .


 Guarenteed half the Bitcoin income the day after vs. the day before, give or take difficulty adjustment.
 100% guarenttee, no question about IF on that part.

 I grant there is a significant probability that the price of Bitcoin will climb quite a bit a month or two before the halfing - but with the way difficulty increases have been going since the introduction of the S7, anything older is going to be LOSING money long before the halfing if you have to pay more than 1-2 cents/KWH and afterwards it looks like the S7 (and Avalon 6 and probably the B-Eleven) will be unprofitable as well at that point.


 No, it's not CERTAIN - but that's the way the trend is looking and the way it HAS been looking for months now.


 I strongly suspect that the only PROFITABLE miners after the halfing will be the 14/16nm generation - though I also suspect if that's the case, that hashrate will dip quite a bit for a short while, *MAYBE* giving the one-previous generation a short "last gasp" of profitablility if you have VERY VERY cheap electric.

legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331

But VV and Niko are both more than proficient in English, so why would it be translated?

you got a point there...maybe that release was prepared not by them, but by a pr agency (in russian), then translated.
who knows...i can hardly imagine nano-size "engineers" moving transistors "by hand" on a chip, but could imagine normal size engineers doing it on a computer screen to optimize.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.

I searched CEO blog post (keep calm and ...) with "by hand"-no results.
Care to give a link? Thanks
BTW, V. Vavilov is CEO, Punin is CTO

http://bitfury.com/products#16nm-asic

Under the heading "Groundbreaking full-custom design".

Quote
Every transistor of the 8162 hash engines was drawn and positioned by hand for optimum performance.



Oh, thanks, this is just bad translation. They probably meant that they tinkered with design and optimized every transistor position manually (bad reverse translation from the russian word that in this particular case likely means non-automatic a.k.a with nonzero input from the engineer).

But VV and Niko are both more than proficient in English, so why would it be translated?
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.

I searched CEO blog post (keep calm and ...) with "by hand"-no results.
Care to give a link? Thanks
BTW, V. Vavilov is CEO, Punin is CTO

http://bitfury.com/products#16nm-asic

Under the heading "Groundbreaking full-custom design".

Quote
Every transistor of the 8162 hash engines was drawn and positioned by hand for optimum performance.



Oh, thanks, this is just bad translation. They probably meant that they tinkered with design and optimized every transistor position manually (bad reverse translation from the russian word that in this particular case likely means non-automatic a.k.a with nonzero input from the engineer).
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
what about the asics price?

no one knows yet unless you have a mill and then you can find out but your under NDA.  

According to what others have said .

my bad
You can find some thing out without a mill

Punin's gotten in touch with me. There's no feasible way I'll get a million bucks but he's working on making small orders possible (if only in a roundabout way) which is definitely nice.

I trust sidehack a lot !!!.


so well see .

legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
 
Quote
BTW - you STILL haven't addressed my question about how Bitmain (or whoever) is supposed to be competative to the 14/16nm gear after the halfing kills the profitability on anything less efficient.


Every time i see something about the halfing and how bad it will be. I LMAO . then think how does anyone know for sure. The answer is you don't unless your god, i don't see how it going to bad other then 12.5 less coins and the chip makers will adjust and in four more years it happen again, if bitcoins are still here.

I try my best not to comment on anything i see that looks negative but from time to time you can't .
legendary
Activity: 1288
Merit: 1068
what about the asics price?
E
full member
Activity: 234
Merit: 100
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.

I searched CEO blog post (keep calm and ...) with "by hand"-no results.
Care to give a link? Thanks
BTW, V. Vavilov is CEO, Punin is CTO

http://bitfury.com/products#16nm-asic

Under the heading "Groundbreaking full-custom design".

Quote
Every transistor of the 8162 hash engines was drawn and positioned by hand for optimum performance.

legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.

I searched CEO blog post (keep calm and ...) with "by hand"-no results.
Care to give a link? Thanks
BTW, V. Vavilov is CEO, Punin is CTO
hero member
Activity: 516
Merit: 500
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.

They probably meant the surrounding transistors, around the chip.  Grin
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

It was mentioned in the CEO's blog that all transistors were laid out by hand.
legendary
Activity: 3892
Merit: 4331
I get fed up saying this but people should read a lot more before shooting their mouths off. No one has laid a chip out by hand since the late 1970's - probably about the time your parents were born. This statement was just another piece of bullshit from Bitfury trying to make their chip sound 'special' in some way.
I, on the other hand, would put this to a combination of "figure of speech" and "language difference".

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C

One way of translating English "director" to Russian would be "pyкoвoдитeль", which in turn translated literally back to English would mean "the one that leads by the hand". In many Slavic languages the equivalents of English "by hand" and "manually" have much wider, figurative use. For example the title of this old thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/algorithmically-placed-fpga-miner-255mhschip-supports-all-known-boards-49971 "Algorithmically placed FPGA miner" could be translated to Russian and back to English as "Hand tailored (or Hand cut) FPGA miner". Somewhat more humorously, some not-that-well translated software documentation uses the above Russian word for the "device driver".

Even native English speaker constantly communicating with bilingual or multilingual people will subconsciously pick up their speech patterns and figures. My favorite example is: the equivalent of English "all thumbs" in several other European languages is "two left hands". Both of those phrases aren't meant to be literal, they are just figures of speech describing a person lacking in manual dexterity.

So my guess is that the PR blurb-writer picked up this hyperbole from the native speakers of Slavic languages who only know English as their 2nd language.

Edit: I've forgotten to add that the in my favorite example to cognitive adaptation is not only linguistic but also involves the associated hand gestures. The "all thumbs" is gestured by curling 8 non-thumb fingers at the knuckles to match the length of the thumbs. The "two left hands" is gestured with showing both hands with thumbs pointing to the left.


not sure what you guys are talking about, but PR simply states "full custom design"

interestingly, for "all thumbs" in Russian good translation would be a literal equivalent of "without hands (бeзpyкий)" or "curly/bent/not straight hands (кpивopyкий)".
Google translate cannot handle the last one without some funny confusion.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030

Like everything that Bitfury announces you have to read very carefully, I refer to: "We understand it will be nearly impossible for any older technology to compete .......". The 'nearly' is the giveaway, despite their strange announcement about 'every transistor on the new chip being laid out by hand' they know that ultimately their solution, for one reason or another, has not worked exactly to plan and that a good full custom 28nm design can beat the crap out of it. Such solutions exist.


 How is every transistor on the new chip being laid out by hand a "strange announcement"? Hello, welcome to the definition of FULL CUSTOM DESIGN.

Care to explain how a full-custom 28nm design like the BM1385 used in the S7 can compete effectively after the halfing against a chip that has demonstrated over twice the efficiency and should still be PROFITABLE by then (it's looking more and more likely that the S7 is going to hit "unprofitable" shortly before the halfing unless you have VERY VERY cheap or FREE electric).

BitFury's real competiton for their new chip isn't going to be 28nm. It is going to be the upcomming A3, and at some point probably a 14/16nm full-custom chip from Bitmain, and possibly 1 or 2 others eventually going with full-custom at 14/16nm.


I get fed up saying this but people should read a lot more before shooting their mouths off. No one has laid a chip out by hand since the late 1970's - probably about the time your parents were born. This statement was just another piece of bullshit from Bitfury trying to make their chip sound 'special' in some way.

If you want some real, actual informed data about what full custom actually entails then I'm happy to recommend some very good books to you to help reduce your level of ignorance, you clearly don't really understand what full custom means or entails or what good engineers can do with it.

I'll bet that Bitmain make a lot of money on their S7's and could probably reduce it's price to sub $600 and still make a profit, so they have no real need in the near future to make a new chip (although I'm sure they will). They'll continue to make money on their 28nm cash cow for some time. They might even conjure up a containerised system of their own......



 Hint.

 *I* was born quite a bit before the 1970s - in fact, I was already in the Navy by the "late 1970s".

 Gratuitous insults with zero factual basis just make YOU look stupid and make people tend to ignore anything else you have to say.


 
 You might want to keep "lead time" in mind - Bitmain certainly is, since they announced that they were already working on a 14/16nm design in the SAME ANNOUNCEMENT where they originally announced the S7.
 Doesn't mean they won't keep selling as many of their current design as they can while it's still profitable to do so, but if they were to wait to start designing the next generation like Avalon has already said they plan to do, Bitmain wouldn't have anything to compete for a long time.



 BTW - you STILL haven't addressed my question about how Bitmain (or whoever) is supposed to be competative to the 14/16nm gear after the halfing kills the profitability on anything less efficient.
legendary
Activity: 1498
Merit: 1030
Philip: Wouldn't is be possible with immersion cooling with 3M novec 7000 in a 2 phase system?



okay we know that immersion lets you make the chips more dense.

but no matter what the tank of coolant is sooner of later it reaches its max in heat storage.  that is why you have fans to toss that heat away.

I see 16 fans  on the container  

those fans are 3 to 4 feet wide  lets say 4

here are the fans you need

http://trianglefans.com/jet-upblast/

http://trianglefans.com/jd/

they have some 42 inch models that will move 30,000 cfm

 I guess 16 of them would work as that is about 500,000 cfm

the avalon6 uses 200cfm to move heat from 1kwatt  and 2000 avalon6's use 2 mega watts so

2000 x 200 = 400,000 cfm  So I guess the air could be moved



 It's more about being able to move ENOUGH air to keep the radiators cool enough to dissapate the heat - we're not looking at direct air cooking which tends to need a LOT more airflow to work.

 Radiator on many common trucks or mid-to-high-power cars is designed to dissipate over 150KW out of about a 2 foot square area, for example - though that's when hauling a large load or accellerating hard or travelling at fairly high speed. Most of the time, the thing is loafing with the thermostat part-closed....

legendary
Activity: 2128
Merit: 1073
I get fed up saying this but people should read a lot more before shooting their mouths off. No one has laid a chip out by hand since the late 1970's - probably about the time your parents were born. This statement was just another piece of bullshit from Bitfury trying to make their chip sound 'special' in some way.
I, on the other hand, would put this to a combination of "figure of speech" and "language difference".

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/%D1%80%D1%83%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B8%D1%82%D0%B5%D0%BB%D1%8C

One way of translating English "director" to Russian would be "pyкoвoдитeль", which in turn translated literally back to English would mean "the one that leads by the hand". In many Slavic languages the equivalents of English "by hand" and "manually" have much wider, figurative use. For example the title of this old thread https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/algorithmically-placed-fpga-miner-255mhschip-supports-all-known-boards-49971 "Algorithmically placed FPGA miner" could be translated to Russian and back to English as "Hand tailored (or Hand cut) FPGA miner". Somewhat more humorously, some not-that-well translated software documentation uses the above Russian word for the "device driver".

Even native English speaker constantly communicating with bilingual or multilingual people will subconsciously pick up their speech patterns and figures. My favorite example is: the equivalent of English "all thumbs" in several other European languages is "two left hands". Both of those phrases aren't meant to be literal, they are just figures of speech describing a person lacking in manual dexterity.

So my guess is that the PR blurb-writer picked up this hyperbole from the native speakers of Slavic languages who only know English as their 2nd language.

Edit: I've forgotten to add that the in my favorite example to cognitive adaptation is not only linguistic but also involves the associated hand gestures. The "all thumbs" is gestured by curling 8 non-thumb fingers at the knuckles to match the length of the thumbs. The "two left hands" is gestured with showing both hands with thumbs pointing to the left.
legendary
Activity: 3374
Merit: 1859
Curmudgeonly hardware guy
If you only use 25% of the chips, and sell off the rest, your NRE didn't change the cost at all. But your fourth of the chips are up and running before the other three fourths, so you get an edge on the diff rise caused by your chips. And if your markup on chips is at least 33%, you basically paid for your fourth of the chips from the profit of selling off the other three fourths, which means you recoup the whole investment up front and still get to mine on your fourth for just the cost of miner assembly and power. You do earn less and less as the rest of your chips (and everyone else's) come online, but your machines are already paid off and profiting by then.
legendary
Activity: 1666
Merit: 1185
dogiecoin.com
However if you only use 25% of the chips
And now your NRE costs make your chips 'cost' 3-4x more.


And since the difficulty is still low
Which it isn't because you aren't the only source of chips, progress or miners, meanwhile you earn less and less of the network while the rest of your chips devalue for absolutely no reason.
legendary
Activity: 1274
Merit: 1000
 you actually trust that go for it ..   time will tell if we get any i hope to eat these words well see. . as i said I heard off till now when they came with that big container and no word on home miners etc. it just seems like they only want the big bucks. screw the rest.


don't try to show me different they have to. I did say that's how it's suppose to work and agree that is the way to do it, go slow we have time , but don't Agree  with how to go  slow  Smiley . but what right to sell those earning to some one. nothing is anyone's right to that extent,  right now im saving for one or two of these if they happen, not the container i have no place for it nor want one or could ever afford it and if i could afford one, I'm not so sure i would want one it might hurt the network, i do care more then about how much it makes.


cya  
Pages:
Jump to: