Topic: [BTCT.CO] [IPO-cancelled] BTCGARDEN MINER---Eyes to the horizon - page 5. (Read 198263 times)
August 12, 2013, 03:29:08 PM
Anyone else find this incredibly ironic?
August 12, 2013, 03:20:23 PM
I knew they were going to fail from day 1 with a name like BTCGARDEN...BTC are mined..not grown. 
I get the same feeling when I look at the name "Icedrill". Sounds like a name a 12 year old made it up. We're not drilling in the arctic here, we're just mining bitcoins
August 12, 2013, 03:11:49 PM
The buyback is complete.
I would like to note that the trade history will show that everyone paid a transaction fee. That is actually incorrect, there is a display bug where the trade history assumes a transaction fee.
The buyback was at 0.01604 to cover your initial purchase transaction fee, and in the buyback itself the transaction fees were waived on both the buyer and seller side.
(tl;dr, it's a display bug.)
Cheers.
I would like to note that the trade history will show that everyone paid a transaction fee. That is actually incorrect, there is a display bug where the trade history assumes a transaction fee.
The buyback was at 0.01604 to cover your initial purchase transaction fee, and in the buyback itself the transaction fees were waived on both the buyer and seller side.
(tl;dr, it's a display bug.)
Cheers.
Thank you Burnside!
August 12, 2013, 03:02:20 PM
I knew they were going to fail from day 1 with a name like BTCGARDEN...BTC are mined..not grown.
I think the 'Garden' name was a very Chinese touch...
August 12, 2013, 02:35:54 PM
I knew they were going to fail from day 1 with a name like BTCGARDEN...BTC are mined..not grown.
Should have seen it coming
August 12, 2013, 02:28:14 PM
I knew they were going to fail from day 1 with a name like BTCGARDEN...BTC are mined..not grown.
August 12, 2013, 02:02:14 PM
The buyback is complete.
I would like to note that the trade history will show that everyone paid a transaction fee. That is actually incorrect, there is a display bug where the trade history assumes a transaction fee.
The buyback was at 0.01604 to cover your initial purchase transaction fee, and in the buyback itself the transaction fees were waived on both the buyer and seller side.
(tl;dr, it's a display bug.)
Cheers.
I would like to note that the trade history will show that everyone paid a transaction fee. That is actually incorrect, there is a display bug where the trade history assumes a transaction fee.
The buyback was at 0.01604 to cover your initial purchase transaction fee, and in the buyback itself the transaction fees were waived on both the buyer and seller side.
(tl;dr, it's a display bug.)
Cheers.
August 12, 2013, 01:51:19 PM
I think people are going to play the rises on Active Mining and Labcoin then sell. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or both spike and then drop back some.
Maybe they'll go AM long term, but short term there's not much gain to be had.
Remember this is money people put into an IPO. They weren't looking for safe, they were looking for gains.
Yes, that's true, though I think some people were into this IPO for the long term.
I do agree that people will play rises and sell on AcM and Labcoin (mostly Labcoin). Some people are going to lose a lot doing that, too (just the nature of the beast).
I do think there are gains to be had short term with AM, but when I say short term, I mean 1-2 weeks, not 1-2 hours.
August 12, 2013, 01:47:06 PM
Lol labcoin .0019 thats sexy
August 12, 2013, 01:46:19 PM
I think people are going to play the rises on Active Mining and Labcoin then sell. I wouldn't be surprised to see one or both spike and then drop back some.
Maybe they'll go AM long term, but short term there's not much gain to be had.
Remember this is money people put into an IPO. They weren't looking for safe, they were looking for gains.
August 12, 2013, 01:44:13 PM
More important that someone transparently pumping their favorite stock...
LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
Correct. Repaid in full here.LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
August 12, 2013, 01:42:56 PM
You were the one calling Aug 9 a day ago before your edited your post. Which I wouldn't mention ordinarily, but now you're trying to pin the discrepancy on me. Nice.
no, you misunderstood, I am not pinning it on you. Yes, I said a day ago, incorrectly, and corrected my comment accordingly.
I misunderstood your response as saying the only rise was a day ago. I am sorry for the confusion.
August 12, 2013, 01:40:21 PM
August 9 being when? A day ago?
There was a one time jump on a big buy, then it went up yesterday along with everything else in anticipation of the buyback money.
Look, you want to pump your holdings. We get it. You've done it. Good job!
I don't know where you are, but Aug 9 is 3 days ago in my time zone.There was a one time jump on a big buy, then it went up yesterday along with everything else in anticipation of the buyback money.
Look, you want to pump your holdings. We get it. You've done it. Good job!
The "one time jump" as you called it was based on the news announced about the new hardware and increased profits for AM.
Regardless of the reasons, it was clearly not a downtrend.
You were the one calling Aug 9 a day ago before your edited your post. Which I wouldn't mention ordinarily, but now you're trying to pin the discrepancy on me. Nice.
Well, what we're not seeing yet is money going to AM.
August 12, 2013, 01:38:24 PM
More important that someone transparently pumping their favorite stock...
LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
Correct. Repaid in full here. LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
August 12, 2013, 01:38:08 PM
August 9 being when? A day ago?
There was a one time jump on a big buy, then it went up yesterday along with everything else in anticipation of the buyback money.
Look, you want to pump your holdings. We get it. You've done it. Good job!
I don't know where you are, but Aug 9 is 3 days ago in my time zone.There was a one time jump on a big buy, then it went up yesterday along with everything else in anticipation of the buyback money.
Look, you want to pump your holdings. We get it. You've done it. Good job!
The "one time jump" as you called it was based on the news announced about the new hardware and increased profits for AM.
Regardless of the reasons, it was clearly not a downtrend.
August 12, 2013, 01:34:18 PM
You do realize there are charts we can look at see that's not the case?
Are you trying to say AM didn't go from ~3.3 to ~3.8 a day ago?
The chart shows a clear up trend from Aug 9:
August 9 being when? A day ago?
There was a one time jump on a big buy, then it went up yesterday along with everything else in anticipation of the buyback money.
Look, you want to pump your holdings. We get it. You've done it. Good job!
August 12, 2013, 01:29:45 PM
You do realize there are charts we can look at see that's not the case?
Are you trying to say AM didn't go from ~3.3 to ~3.8 a few days ago?
The chart shows a clear up trend from Aug 9:
August 12, 2013, 01:29:01 PM
More important that someone transparently pumping their favorite stock...
LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
LOOKS LIKE THE BUYBACK IS IN PROGRESS RIGHT NOW.
August 12, 2013, 01:28:54 PM
It has started.
August 12, 2013, 01:28:27 PM
Buy back going on now!
Jump to: