Topic: Computer Scientists Prove God Exists - page 24. (Read 25293 times)

So you just demonstated how you and I and others exist prior to any Universe that operates according to physical laws without any sort of God. Congratulations!

Therefore God is a collective of all of us

??

He, and now you, and now I, and now the reader of this...all did ...
According to your formulations.

Let's say that each human is like a computer and that God, the creator of all "software"  could "download" information or an "update" into each of us when we personally asked Him to.  Then we would be able to "know" more things then the person next to us that has not asked for that.

In a way it is like that with spiritual things.  1Corinthians 12:8 "To one there is given through the Spirit a message of wisdom, to another a message of knowledge by means of the same Spirit"

So perhaps our claims of "understanding things" is true? 

Of course there are people that are prideful and bragging that they know it all and this is not right as seen in this verse:
1 Corinthians 13:2  If I have the gift of prophecy and can fathom all mysteries and all knowledge, and if I have a faith that can move mountains, but do not have love, I am nothing.

There's nothing you can't know.  Part of you knows everything.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Akashic_records

This right here is the problem with religious folk.  They have no problems making claims that they understand things they simply don't know and even things they *can't* know.

Regarding the question of relevance, even though many do already understand that consciousness is the root to all the experience and in that sense has primacy over allegedly "real" physical reality, it is also important to understand that we do live in a collective reality, to which we donate part of our energy to maintain the common framework of rules on the automatic unconscious level. That's why it is so hard for individual aware "players" to manifest things if they go against common rules, things like defying gravity with your will or walking through the wall. There is unconscious part of you, that has agreed a priory that this is not allowed.

But the tricky part is that the rules, that constitute physical reality, don't exist as an idea onto itself. So by studying the physical reality we're actually trying to figure out what is it, that we have agreed collectively to be true and not some fundamental underlying level of existence.

Here is a piece on the topic for those who want to learn more about the actual structure in place. I cannot prove that what is being said is absolute truth, but can only suggest it as yet another point of view and point out, that the source of information has demonstrated the level of consistency over the past 30 years, that cannot be easily written off as guessing or making things up.

"Game of Chess"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X5aPEzAKw3A

One more thing. If laws of physical reality can eventually be defied, as our collective unconscious slowly begins loosening on maintaining its (physical reality's) rigid structure, there are fundamental laws of existence, that cannot be changed.

"Four Laws of Creation"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fiotqFbgonM

Life is but a dream.

Thanks for sharing.

flying in your dreams is fun. It interesting because its something you get better and better at the more practice you have. Its like a real skill. I've had dreams where I'm teaching people how to fly.  Also, I can run really fast (like 500mph) by taking really long strides.  Each stride I get faster and faster.  I land facing sideways and right after I jump I turn the way I'm facing. Idk why, But this picks up speed.  There are definitely many other skills you can learn while dreaming.  Granted, they only work in Dreams.  But it feels like I'm learning a skill.

I don't know what you've been doing for eternity, that's in your control.  You were probably in a different physical universe.  If our universe is indeed a bubble, or even if it's not, there are surely infinite dimensions or multiverses in the same exact spot.

Until that crazy guy resurrected from the dead to prove the eternity of the soul.  And until another crazy guy starts flying.  Then you will believe a very relevant story.

It's pretty great, I can fly in my dreams on command now.  Can't wait till that one sunny day.

Indeed they will vokain.

Vod, you can only help yourself, I have done my best.

I'm cross-posting this video from the "Jesus Christ" thread, as it surprisingly has relevance to this discussion, as it touches upon the existence itself and multiplicity of parallel realities, when dealing with the questions of whether something is/was true or not. Thus the validity of certain statements is transformed from the realm of "absolute truth" and "absolute lie" to a "measure of relevance" with regards to a position/state of the one asking or asserting. The only thing that does seem to be absolute is one's own existence.

"Did Jesus Christ Actually Exist?" (3:00)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwbUL6XsUQI

I would encourage readers to watch the first three videos (a few minutes long each) I posted on a previous page, as this one is a continuation of that train of thought to some degree, even though it brings some new information (about Jesus), that cannot be derived from simple logic and definitions within our language constructs, so take it as a gift if you wish

PS: total length is in (min:sec)

I trust myself more than I trust anyone else, kind of like how I trust me more than anyone else to keep my bitcoins safe.  I think if you had two bitcoin exchanges offering to secure your coins, you'd opt out of both options and just do it yourself.

Also, most trustworthy (in a peer-reviewed, empirical context only) does not mean best, most accurate, etc.  Which is good, because it's not.  It's utterly useless for describing non-empirical things, such as its own reliance on abstract mathematical laws.

Here's a fun quote describing the scientific attitude: "'Reality consists of all and only that to which we can apply a protocol which cannot be applied to its own (mathematical) ingredients and is therefore unreal.'  Mandating the use of “unreality” to describe “reality” is rather questionable in anyone’s protocol." 

Like you paying back your debts for example. I won't hold my breath.

You should really watch the "12 dimensions of consciousness" videos above.
It has 5th dimension and more

Quantum healed?   

Wow.  All I asked was what the 5th dimension was.  Can you explain it?

Then you wouldn't be there
That universe wouldn't have a recipe or any kind of pre-existing idea of you for you to ever show up there.
It wouldn't know you.

Here are a few short but insightful videos on the topic:

"Existence" (3:22)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=41dGJwufXPc

"Why do we exist?" (1:47)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=njKs8v61kMU

"I Am" (2:48)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Xe0-cSZ6gE

Also, talking about dimensions, it might be more relevant to talk about dimensions of a primary substance, that is consciousness, rather than dimensions of a secondary by product of it, which is space-time.

"12 dimensions of consciousness part 1" (9:59)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iiIEyxZFtxw

"12 dimensions of consciousness part 2" (9:58)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5KaBPBzlX2Y

"12 dimensions of consciousness part 3" (9:59)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cq5KO-uQack

PS: the total length is in (min:sec)

LOL, nice try. No, the headline has been clearly orchestrated to suck people in. I can tell without reading it, it will contain no proof.

everything i think comes true

I replaced one fancyword with another fancyword, and it still works... Can you guys see that just slapping the word "god" into this doesn't actually do anything other than make up some new definition of the word god?

Do you know anything that is not based on your experience in the world? I would guess no. So, if we need to experience the world to think about the world and stuff in general, what were we doing and thinking about for trillions of years before the physical universe existed?

Actually no, wrong. It makes it special for one simple reason: relevance. If it affects everyone, as can be tested by repeating the experiment, then it is relevant to everyone, and can be used to change or influence everyone's world. If it is just some single guy's crazy fantasy, or even some single guy's crazy realty, but does not affect anyone else other than that one guy, that it's nothing but a nice story that doesn't really matter to anyone else. For instance, it's nice that dank can supposedly exist in many dimensions, but it is irrelevant to everyone else, and is this nothing but a useless stupid story.