Topic: DefaultTrust changes - page 141. (Read 86349 times)
if you remove the tag now "only after his tag started to show on your profile" then indeed it will be questionable, you tagged him for "scamming" based on your feedback, so it's either you falsely accused him , or if your accusation was right then it's wrong to remove it now just for the purpose of "cleaning" your trust.
I am not against "settlements" , everyone who tagged someone should allow some flexibility, specially for the "unclear" cases like the own bidding situation you tagged Anduck for, but this has to apply for everyone not just new DT members with new power !
it's surprising that some people are now asking you to remove the tag, but never did before "Anduck" became a DT member, so you are right when you tag a non-DT member but not so right when you tag a DT member?
I am afraid this new update will fail big time as some DT members will be afraid to tag other DT members or "potentially" coming DT members just to save themselves from being removed from DT.
this is not related to you "Vod" and "Anduck" it just a general assumption of a potential shitty scenario where some DT members might look the other way only to stay on DT.
You however being a child rapist is not funny!
Your history is known.
FYI:
Let the cowards pile on the red trust , only showing their cowardice.
1 or 1 million makes no difference.
achow101 , you always were a dumb anal dwelling censorship butt monkey.
Tman is a mere dumb ass kissing child.
@Theymos, see how your rank of pussies attack merely when someone won't cower to their will.
Making your DT as useless as your pretense of moral character.
Lauda's Mouth is nothing more than Theymos cock holster.
I just deleted my all trust list personalizations and going to start again.
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
Which raises a question - is there a way to see one's eligibility? Like how many 10-merit users are including the user? The current trust hierarchy can only show who's included by people in my list but not the other way round. I know this can be extracted from data dumps but that's convoluted. Having visibility of it might help detect abuse before it happens.
I don't think so. Someone could make a parser that updates this in real time. Maybe Vod could add it to BPIP (e.g. a page called "DT1 elligibility"). Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
So much win; you deserve a smile from me.
That is not all he got from you Laudanum.
Just 4 days ago, I was actually surprised how many people had included me:
I'm now including you as well, so I'm guessing you're only a couple of inclusions away from DT1.
I still need to increase my own trust list though.https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz is updated weekly; you could monitor that.
I may make a rankup list someday, if DdmrDdrm doesn't beat me to it.I'm also a bit worried how easy it's going to be for a bunch of Newbies to get on DT1 by abusing just 1 Legendary with 200 sMerit. Of course exclusions will fix that again quickly, but not before creating some drama.
you do realise that you deserve to be tagged for being so fucking annoying right.
please let the adults discuss the changes - then in time you might get a response, keep on like this and you are going to get nothing!
please let the adults discuss the changes - then in time you might get a response, keep on like this and you are going to get nothing!
What I did child was provoke a response, from those trying to cover up the facts.
When you can grow a beard , then talk to me. (In another 5 years)
Try to search here idk what is the command for windows
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
I'll play around with it. Even if exclude him successfully not sure what's gonna happen if he changes his name again. Hopefully it's based on user ID somehow.
You can just copy/paste his whole name, and it is stored as a user ID.
Actually, users keep both usernames it might be helpful to know...
It's essentially just a link that gets created. Blazed, vod and anduck can still be contacted via pm by using their old usernames.
Which raises a question - is there a way to see one's eligibility? Like how many 10-merit users are including the user? The current trust hierarchy can only show who's included by people in my list but not the other way round. I know this can be extracted from data dumps but that's convoluted. Having visibility of it might help detect abuse before it happens.
I don't think so. Someone could make a parser that updates this in real time. Maybe Vod could add it to BPIP (e.g. a page called "DT1 elligibility"). Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
So much win; you deserve a smile from me. Theymos quit being a coward,
You reinstated Lauda,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
You reinstated Lauda,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
Well at least you admit Lauda Sucked your Dick to get back on DT.
Notice she has no intention of burying any hatchet except in other's heads.
So the DT bullshit will continue as long as she is around.
Theymos quit being a coward,
You reinstated Lauda ,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
FYI:
Wow, you are really lame Theymos,
it must be because you know you have no defense and your actions reinstating Laudanum (
) a reprehensible act.
If you are looking for quiet solace her future actions will not bring it.
You reinstated Lauda ,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
FYI:
Wow, you are really lame Theymos,
it must be because you know you have no defense and your actions reinstating Laudanum (
) a reprehensible act.If you are looking for quiet solace her future actions will not bring it.
you do realise that you deserve to be tagged for being so fucking annoying right.
please let the adults discuss the changes - then in time you might get a response, keep on like this and you are going to get nothing!
Theymos quit being a coward,
You reinstated Lauda,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
You reinstated Lauda,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
Just 4 days ago, I was actually surprised how many people had included me:
I'm now including you as well, so I'm guessing you're only a couple of inclusions away from DT1.
Which raises a question - is there a way to see one's eligibility? Like how many 10-merit users are including the user? The current trust hierarchy can only show who's included by people in my list but not the other way round. I know this can be extracted from data dumps but that's convoluted. Having visibility of it might help detect abuse before it happens.
That would make the rest of my trust ratings questionable.
It would certainly not, no.Of course it would!
If all it takes for a scammer to get away with scamming is to tag me back and then negotiate mutual removal, no one will trust my ratings anymore.
If Anduck is willing to remove his rating if I remove mine, what does that say about his rating?
I've now removed my negative ratings to you. I'll briefly explain why.
First of all, I am all for burying the hatchet.
Secondly, some events in the Internet where no monetary or other kind of real damage was done, do not really give a complete image of person's trustworthiness.
Given that Vod has worked in various ways to improve the forum, and based on other peoples (positive) views about him, I think that my rating was not anymore reasonable as it now also carries DT weight.
Theymos quit being a coward,
You reinstated Lauda ,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
FYI:
Wow, you are really lame Theymos,
it must be because you know you have no defense and your actions reinstating Laudanum () a reprehensible act.
If you are looking for quiet solace her future actions will not bring it.
You reinstated Lauda ,and you remain silent.
Man up and admit she does unspeakable deeds for you.
FYI:
Wow, you are really lame Theymos,
it must be because you know you have no defense and your actions reinstating Laudanum (
) a reprehensible act.If you are looking for quiet solace her future actions will not bring it.
Try to search here idk what is the command for windows
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
I'll play around with it. Even if exclude him successfully not sure what's gonna happen if he changes his name again. Hopefully it's based on user ID somehow.
You can just copy/paste his whole name, and it is stored as a user ID.
Interesting changes. Looks like more people are going to have to learn to get along now
Doubtful Lauda has always been hard to get along with ,
and Theymos directly sanctions her actions, why would she change anything she does.
It looks like - as LoyceV found out earlier in the thread - that existing DT members were at a slight disadvantage in this initial DT1 reorg. Being in DT means that other users are less likely to include you in their custom lists explicitly.
Just 4 days ago, I was actually surprised how many people had included me:Code:
OgNasty->LoyceV
TheQuin->LoyceV
Avirunes->LoyceV
teeGUMES->LoyceV
nutildah->LoyceV
mocacinno->LoyceV
HiDevin->LoyceV
Code:
TheQuin-/>OgNasty
Avirunes-/>OgNasty
Interesting changes. Looks like more people are going to have to learn to get along now
Looks like OgNasty is not a part of current DT system,anyone feels he deserved to be in the list again.
BTW Meta and Reputation section will go on fire for some days again.
BTW Meta and Reputation section will go on fire for some days again.
He was better than many, odd his exclusion returned Lauda to DT.
Any explanation on this Theymos?
or are you also on silent mode like lauda?
Is Theymos unable to speak for himself or are you officially sanctioned to speak for him?
I would think the high and mighty Theymos would have no fear of speaking to a lowly member with no DT status.
Then again the truth can be a very sharp sword.
Think a cowardly permaban might silence the truth, LOL, Try it.
Jump to: