And I will too. If my understanding is right, although I'm not trusted by anyone, simply by virtue of having earned enough merits, my inclusion will count?
Yes. There are thousands of users whose custom lists will start to matter a lot.
Topic: DefaultTrust changes - page 139. (Read 85606 times)
Yes. There are thousands of users whose custom lists will start to matter a lot.
happy those who have a theymos on their side.
miserable that we are without having some one who will update the rules to restore our dignity and become again in a pure state like we were before.
welcome back guys.
miserable that we are without having some one who will update the rules to restore our dignity and become again in a pure state like we were before.
welcome back guys.
cryptohunter is back with -ve trust. Does that mean we will be subjected to another set of insults, threats, and lies? Armageddon? 
You can guarantee there will be a new novel written by cryptohunter tonight for all to read 
I'm going to have to ask you to stop using that gif because every time I see it makes me feel funny in my pants.
There's a fix for your pants:Firefox > about:config > image.animation_mode > once
Now it's just a dumb looking picture.
I'll delete this post in 15 minutes.
I am afraid this new update will fail big time as some DT members will be afraid to tag other DT members or "potentially" coming DT members just to save themselves from being removed from DT.
Yep. It was easy to trust Theymos, but now we have to trust random people that come and go off of DT1.
I think I'll stop tagging for a while until I see how this plays out.
I just deleted my all trust list personalizations and going to start again.
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;dt is the DT view regardless of your own settings.
As I said before, although we obviously disagreed about the conduct of that auction, I don't think it should have permanently marked your account given your otherwise extensive positive trading history.
Exactly.And I will too. If my understanding is right, although I'm not trusted by anyone, simply by virtue of having earned enough merits, my inclusion will count?
Yes.-snip-
I'm going to have to ask you to stop using that gif because every time I see it makes me feel funny in my pants.
it's surprising that some people are now asking you to remove the tag, but never did before "Anduck" became a DT member, so you are right when you tag a non-DT member but not so right when you tag a DT member?
I am afraid this new update will fail big time as some DT members will be afraid to tag other DT members or "potentially" coming DT members just to save themselves from being removed from DT.
this is not related to you "Vod" and "Anduck" it just a general assumption of a potential shitty scenario where some DT members might look the other way only to stay on DT.
As far as I know the DT1 list also may get refreshed every month so if some of the DT member is abusing the trust system can be excluded by the others.I am afraid this new update will fail big time as some DT members will be afraid to tag other DT members or "potentially" coming DT members just to save themselves from being removed from DT.
this is not related to you "Vod" and "Anduck" it just a general assumption of a potential shitty scenario where some DT members might look the other way only to stay on DT.
Hoping that no misuse of DT power will happen anymore.
Just 4 days ago, I was actually surprised how many people had included me:
I'm now including you as wellAnd I will too. If my understanding is right, although I'm not trusted by anyone, simply by virtue of having earned enough merits, my inclusion will count? I always just used Default Trust because I like to see things the same way the majority of users did, but I'll be playing around with a custom trust list over the next few days.
I've now removed my negative ratings to you.
Thank you for taking the first step here. As I said before, although we obviously disagreed about the conduct of that auction, I don't think it should have permanently marked your account given your otherwise extensive positive trading history. More cooperation and less conflict amongst senior members, who should all be on the same team (protecting the forum from scammers), can only be a good thing.
-snip-
I'm going to have to ask you to stop using that gif because every time I see it makes me feel funny in my pants.
Now this is a good news. Hope this change will lead to better ecosystem in the forum and hope this will push more people to use custom lists too.
Happy to see Krogo on the DT1, congrats man.
Brace yourself, trust statistics are coming
Happy to see Krogo on the DT1, congrats man.
Brace yourself, trust statistics are coming
cryptohunter is back with -ve trust. Does that mean we will be subjected to another set of insults, threats, and lies? Armageddon?
if you remove the tag now "only after his tag started to show on your profile" then indeed it will be questionable, you tagged him for "scamming" based on your feedback, so it's either you falsely accused him , or if your accusation was right then it's wrong to remove it now just for the purpose of "cleaning" your trust.
I am not against "settlements" , everyone who tagged someone should allow some flexibility, specially for the "unclear" cases like the own bidding situation you tagged Anduck for, but this has to apply for everyone not just new DT members with new power !
it's surprising that some people are now asking you to remove the tag, but never did before "Anduck" became a DT member, so you are right when you tag a non-DT member but not so right when you tag a DT member?
I am afraid this new update will fail big time as some DT members will be afraid to tag other DT members or "potentially" coming DT members just to save themselves from being removed from DT.
this is not related to you "Vod" and "Anduck" it just a general assumption of a potential shitty scenario where some DT members might look the other way only to stay on DT.
You however being a child rapist is not funny!
Your history is known.
FYI:
Let the cowards pile on the red trust , only showing their cowardice.
1 or 1 million makes no difference.
achow101 , you always were a dumb anal dwelling censorship butt monkey.
Tman is a mere dumb ass kissing child.
@Theymos, see how your rank of pussies attack merely when someone won't cower to their will.
Making your DT as useless as your pretense of moral character.
Lauda's Mouth is nothing more than Theymos cock holster.
I just deleted my all trust list personalizations and going to start again.
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
Why, I'm not sure, but my brain just melted a bit and I want to think about it.
In view of the small number of members who actually set their own list, then I guess the vast majority will be seeing red and green trust by default left by these DT1 and DT2 members
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust
Is that right?
Which raises a question - is there a way to see one's eligibility? Like how many 10-merit users are including the user? The current trust hierarchy can only show who's included by people in my list but not the other way round. I know this can be extracted from data dumps but that's convoluted. Having visibility of it might help detect abuse before it happens.
I don't think so. Someone could make a parser that updates this in real time. Maybe Vod could add it to BPIP (e.g. a page called "DT1 elligibility"). Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
So much win; you deserve a smile from me.
That is not all he got from you Laudanum.
Just 4 days ago, I was actually surprised how many people had included me:
I'm now including you as well, so I'm guessing you're only a couple of inclusions away from DT1.
I still need to increase my own trust list though.https://bitcointalk.org/trust.txt.xz is updated weekly; you could monitor that.
I may make a rankup list someday, if DdmrDdrm doesn't beat me to it.I'm also a bit worried how easy it's going to be for a bunch of Newbies to get on DT1 by abusing just 1 Legendary with 200 sMerit. Of course exclusions will fix that again quickly, but not before creating some drama.
you do realise that you deserve to be tagged for being so fucking annoying right.
please let the adults discuss the changes - then in time you might get a response, keep on like this and you are going to get nothing!
please let the adults discuss the changes - then in time you might get a response, keep on like this and you are going to get nothing!
What I did child was provoke a response, from those trying to cover up the facts.
When you can grow a beard , then talk to me. (In another 5 years)
Try to search here idk what is the command for windows
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
https://emojipedia.org/camping/
You probably can use their copy on website 🏕️
I'll play around with it. Even if exclude him successfully not sure what's gonna happen if he changes his name again. Hopefully it's based on user ID somehow.
You can just copy/paste his whole name, and it is stored as a user ID.
Actually, users keep both usernames it might be helpful to know...
It's essentially just a link that gets created. Blazed, vod and anduck can still be contacted via pm by using their old usernames.
Which raises a question - is there a way to see one's eligibility? Like how many 10-merit users are including the user? The current trust hierarchy can only show who's included by people in my list but not the other way round. I know this can be extracted from data dumps but that's convoluted. Having visibility of it might help detect abuse before it happens.
I don't think so. Someone could make a parser that updates this in real time. Maybe Vod could add it to BPIP (e.g. a page called "DT1 elligibility"). Damn, I'm found out. While personally training Lauda in the dark arts of forum moderation, we fell deeply in love. I couldn't bear to see her endure the torture of trust drama while doing unspeakable deeds for me, so I invented this complicated algorithm as an excuse to add her back in even though I could've just unilaterally added her to DT at any second. Truly, my cowardice knows no bounds.
So much win; you deserve a smile from me. Jump to: