Did we actually really land on moon?

QuadeBarrier

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: Spendulus on January 17, 2020, 10:01:52 PM

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 17, 2020, 09:17:20 PM

Quote from: Negotiation on January 10, 2020, 09:47:33 AM

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM

Quote from: johnwest on December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM

My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?

I do not think that after going to the moon every subsequent trip will be free because once the US creates this opportunity to go to the moon, then everyone can go. Also on the moon the Blue Armstrongs went before and they built many colonies.

Ok, everyone can go, but whose going to pay for it? And what would be the point, welfare? Everyone can go to the moon. You're taking tv shows made for entertainment too seriously, and thus think we should have colonies just because. There are far bigger issues in the world that would need to be taken care of.

I think cows, chickens and pigs should be allowed to go to the moon, because otherwise, how are these colonies going to get great food? Wouldn't you want a 16 oz (500 gram) prime ribeye after a hard week in the lunar mines? And don't forget the rights of vegetables and fruits. They have rights too, and the products of fruits and vegetables are things like beer, wine, and whiskey.

Well, maybe not beer. I suppose carbonation wouldn't work too well with the lowered pressure levels in the vessels these people would live in.

In that case beer could be good on the moon. With the weaker gravity, when you're hungover it won't hurt too much when you fall down. Unless you fall into a crater I guess.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

^^ We're going to ride the bomb are we?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on January 24, 2020, 01:01:21 PM

Heaven's gate had a better chance of on landing on Hale-Bopp than NASA had making it to the Moon back in '69.

https://i.imgur.com/Q4k2rBB.png
Marshall Herff Applewhite Jr. (May 17, 1931 – March 26, 1997), also known as Do.

"The members of the Heaven's Gate cult believed they were destined for another world — and in the end, there was only one way to get there." -- allthatsinteresting.com

It isn't always the better capabilities or odds that make something work better.

The USA had the atom bomb rocket capability in the '60s. NASA toys are nothing compared with atom bomb technology. NASA toys easily work.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: notbatman on January 24, 2020, 01:01:21 PM

....

It may come as a surprise to you, but bigger pictures and bigger lettering doesn't make your words and ideas bigger in true.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Heaven's gate had a better chance of on landing on Hale-Bopp than NASA had making it to the Moon back in '69.

Marshall Herff Applewhite Jr. (May 17, 1931 – March 26, 1997), also known as Do.

"The members of the Heaven's Gate cult believed they were destined for another world — and in the end, there was only one way to get there." -- allthatsinteresting.com

UFO Chaos

newbie

Activity: 11

Merit: 0

If there was not some genuine doubt, would this thread still be going? Also, does it matter and why? If our leaders can get away with that, are we not proven to be living in some kind of authoritarian nightmare?

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on January 18, 2020, 03:29:30 PM

.

cows & cows & cows

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FavUpD_IjVY

Wink

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

.

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 17, 2020, 09:17:20 PM

Quote from: Negotiation on January 10, 2020, 09:47:33 AM

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM

Quote from: johnwest on December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM

My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?

I do not think that after going to the moon every subsequent trip will be free because once the US creates this opportunity to go to the moon, then everyone can go. Also on the moon the Blue Armstrongs went before and they built many colonies.

Ok, everyone can go, but whose going to pay for it? And what would be the point, welfare? Everyone can go to the moon. You're taking tv shows made for entertainment too seriously, and thus think we should have colonies just because. There are far bigger issues in the world that would need to be taken care of.

I think cows, chickens and pigs should be allowed to go to the moon, because otherwise, how are these colonies going to get great food? Wouldn't you want a 16 oz (500 gram) prime ribeye after a hard week in the lunar mines? And don't forget the rights of vegetables and fruits. They have rights too, and the products of fruits and vegetables are things like beer, wine, and whiskey.

Well, maybe not beer. I suppose carbonation wouldn't work too well with the lowered pressure levels in the vessels these people would live in.

QuadeBarrier

newbie

Activity: 70

Merit: 0

Quote from: Negotiation on January 10, 2020, 09:47:33 AM

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM

Quote from: johnwest on December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM

My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?

I do not think that after going to the moon every subsequent trip will be free because once the US creates this opportunity to go to the moon, then everyone can go. Also on the moon the Blue Armstrongs went before and they built many colonies.

Ok, everyone can go, but whose going to pay for it? And what would be the point, welfare? Everyone can go to the moon. You're taking tv shows made for entertainment too seriously, and thus think we should have colonies just because. There are far bigger issues in the world that would need to be taken care of.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on January 11, 2020, 05:45:42 PM

Two wolves and lamb deciding on what's for lunch isn't much of a negotiation.

If this is what you really think, stop offering yourself for lunch all the time.

Cool

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

Two wolves and lamb deciding on what's for lunch isn't much of a negotiation.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Negotiation on January 10, 2020, 09:47:33 AM

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM

Quote from: johnwest on December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM

My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?

I do not think that after going to the moon every subsequent trip will be free because once the US creates this opportunity to go to the moon, then everyone can go. Also on the moon the Blue Armstrongs went before and they built many colonies.

That's what it's all about... Negotiation, between those who want to go and those who get paid to take them.

Cool

Negotiation

sr. member

Activity: 1204

Merit: 270

Hire Bitcointalk Camp. Manager @ r7promotions.com

Quote from: QuadeBarrier on January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM

Quote from: johnwest on December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM

My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?

I do not think that after going to the moon every subsequent trip will be free because once the US creates this opportunity to go to the moon, then everyone can go. Also on the moon the Blue Armstrongs went before and they built many colonies.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on January 05, 2020, 09:56:46 AM

^^^ Can we learn how fractional distillation works?

https://i.imgur.com/8InZ6yr.png

I'm curious, what the school is on why different substances into separate layers?

Personally I think it's because of density, pressure and a source of electrons (-) from the extended plain that is the ground. **mic drop** God's firmament of heaven, the dome above us has a great electrical potential (+).

I can make shit stick to the roof like the exorcist in a laboratory with the Coulomb Force and a fluid via a phenomenon known as electromigration. You can take your gravity and shovel it Prof. Lizard Tits!

Density is simply the way different molecules fit together because of their shape, due to the number of electron shells their atoms have, and their atomic configuration.

A denser material has more matter inside a given space than a less dense material does.

Gravity acts more strongly on the more material than it does on the less material, but only if the given space is the same size for both materials.

That's really what density is all about. Density doesn't work without gravity or some other force... like centrifugal force inside a container.

Centrifugal force inside a container separates materials of different densities just like gravity does. It's the force on the materials that does the work... not their denseness.

Cool

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: notbatman on January 05, 2020, 09:56:46 AM

^^^ Can we learn how fractional distillation works?

I'm curious, what the school is on why different substances into separate layers?

Personally I think it's because of density, pressure and a source of electrons (-) from the extended plain that is the ground. **mic drop** God's firmament of heaven, the dome above us has a great electrical potential (+).

I can make shit stick to the roof like the exorcist in a laboratory with the Coulomb Force and a fluid via a phenomenon known as electromigration. You can take your gravity and shovel it Prof. Lizard Tits!

Your picture comes from imbibing the distillation from mash.

Cool

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: Spendulus on January 09, 2020, 02:56:22 PM

Quote from: notbatman on January 09, 2020, 11:37:16 AM

@Spendulus how does an experimental setup that uses an electric effect used, for e.g. in PCR Gel DNA testing (the effect sorts molecules by size), somehow equate to death rays? The Coulomb Force is already on the books, it's just never applied to the grand scale because reasons.

Hey buddy no raygun no belief. Tell you what. Put that raygun together, you got the theories all figured out. Anything that holds all that firmament shit up in the sky has boogie power.

I'll pay...

5 BTC.

You know that's a great deal.

Let's keep it simple. Pistol configuration, conventional iron sights, sixteen shot capable, gigajoule range. Beam focusing to 3mm at 25 feet, effective range four miles.

Operationally, I blast a couple squirrels and you get paid. Is that cool or not?

In fact, just in case you got pet squirrels and don't like that test scenario, we can do paper targets with squirrel pictures. Testing at 75 feet.

Deal or not.

BADecker

legendary

Activity: 3906

Merit: 1373

Quote from: Spendulus on January 09, 2020, 02:56:22 PM

Quote from: notbatman on January 09, 2020, 11:37:16 AM

@Spendulus how does an experimental setup that uses an electric effect used, for e.g. in PCR Gel DNA testing (the effect sorts molecules by size), somehow equate to death rays? The Coulomb Force is already on the books, it's just never applied to the grand scale because reasons.

Hey buddy no raygun no belief. Tell you what. Put that raygun together, you got the theories all figured out. Anything that holds all that firmament shit up in the sky has boogie power.

I'll pay...

5 BTC.

You know that's a great deal.

Why does notbatman keep this up? He knows that people talking over 5G and 4G cellphones, is only a camouflage for the raygun neutralizing affect 4G and 5G have on rayguns.

Wink

Spendulus

legendary

Activity: 2926

Merit: 1386

Quote from: notbatman on January 09, 2020, 11:37:16 AM

@Spendulus how does an experimental setup that uses an electric effect used, for e.g. in PCR Gel DNA testing (the effect sorts molecules by size), somehow equate to death rays? The Coulomb Force is already on the books, it's just never applied to the grand scale because reasons.

Hey buddy no raygun no belief. Tell you what. Put that raygun together, you got the theories all figured out. Anything that holds all that firmament shit up in the sky has boogie power.

I'll pay...

5 BTC.

You know that's a great deal.

notbatman

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 1038

@Spendulus how does an experimental setup that uses an electric effect used, for e.g. in PCR Gel DNA testing (the effect sorts molecules by size), somehow equate to death rays? The Coulomb Force is already on the books, it's just never applied to the grand scale because reasons.

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? (Read 7512 times)