Pages:
Author

Topic: Did we actually really land on moon? - page 2. (Read 7512 times)

legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 08, 2020, 05:42:44 PM
^^^ What bearing does this have on whether scripture is true? Taking a badly translated description of a rino then screaming unicorn farts doesn't have any relevance to whether the text is referring to an actual animal.

The Coulomb Force can be demonstrated via experiment in the lab. You can't demonstrate what causes gravity in the lab because it's nonsense, stop being a loser.


Make the raygun using your advanced sciency stuff, and upon testing it and verifying it works on some squirrels, I will pay a fair price for it. Would one bitcoin do?

Our 40th President was going to do this, and set a bunch of them in orbit around the earth. But the spelling for such would have been "Reagan."

 Cheesy
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
January 08, 2020, 01:50:48 PM
^^^ What bearing does this have on whether scripture is true? Taking a badly translated description of a rino then screaming unicorn farts doesn't have any relevance to whether the text is referring to an actual animal.

The Coulomb Force can be demonstrated via experiment in the lab. You can't demonstrate what causes gravity in the lab because it's nonsense, stop being a loser.


Make the raygun using your advanced sciency stuff, and upon testing it and verifying it works on some squirrels, I will pay a fair price for it. Would one bitcoin do?
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 08, 2020, 11:33:27 AM
^^^ What bearing does this have on whether scripture is true? Taking a badly translated description of a rino then screaming unicorn farts doesn't have any relevance to whether the text is referring to an actual animal.

The Coulomb Force can be demonstrated via experiment in the lab. You can't demonstrate what causes gravity in the lab because it's nonsense, stop being a loser.

jr. member
Activity: 89
Merit: 3
January 08, 2020, 03:23:49 AM
We don't leave God out of it just because you want label everything related as "religious" taboo. We're inside an engineered structure with electric lights. Scripture (KJV) says the firmament is a solid metal mirror and the celestial objects are within.

Everything I say about the Coulomb Force and electromigration is already documented and confirmed, the science is settled so to speak.

It's funny when I see some people trying so hard to explain how physics agree with the farts of a nomad written in some papyrus a couple thousand years ago. Sorry but your scripture is stinky.
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
January 06, 2020, 09:46:13 PM

You'll want to bury that rotten theory (gravity) a few feet down.


Now you're talking. Gotta get that theory (gravity) right down there where gravity is. Of course, it's more than a few feet...

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
January 06, 2020, 09:11:06 PM
....the science is settled so to speak. ....

I'm certainly glad to hear that.

How about you make us a working ray gun blaster with them theories?

I promise not to use it on anything except skunks, squirrels, and sea otters.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 05, 2020, 08:01:53 PM
^^^ You lose, let me explain.

We don't leave God out of it just because you want label everything related as "religious" taboo. We're inside an engineered structure with electric lights. Scripture (KJV) says the firmament is a solid metal mirror and the celestial objects are within.

Everything I say about the Coulomb Force and electromigration is already documented and confirmed, the science is settled so to speak.

Head down to the agriculture department and find their garden shed, then head out back and start digging. You'll want to bury that rotten theory (gravity) a few feet down. Also find the jar with Eisenstein's brain and toss the contents in too.






edit:
According to wiki, electromigration is now being called or has been redefined as "Electro-osmosis" or "Electroosmotic flow".

   "Electroosmotic flow is caused by the Coulomb force induced by an electric field on net mobile electric charge in a solution. Because the chemical equilibrium between a solid surface and an electrolyte solution typically leads to the interface acquiring a net fixed electrical charge, a layer of mobile ions, known as an electrical double layer or Debye layer, forms in the region near the interface. When an electric field is applied to the fluid (usually via electrodes placed at inlets and outlets), the net charge in the electrical double layer is induced to move by the resulting Coulomb force. The resulting flow is termed electroosmotic flow." -- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electro-osmosis

Outside the lab, the fluid medium is the atmosphere and the applied electric field is between the firmament and the ground. This is why the ground is 'down', the sky is 'up' and, it's the underlying mechanism behind density and buoyancy or why objects fall.

I'm sure you've got a lot of "b-b-but what about" questions and they're all for the most part answered by displacement current, scalar & vector potentials and the static aether.
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 755
Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis
January 05, 2020, 02:35:36 PM
Personally I think it's because of density,

That's the smartest thing you have ever said son.

God's firmament of heaven,

Can you spare us the religious stuff? firmament=heaven=stars=galaxies

the dome above us has a great electrical potential (+).

The Sun above us has great electrical potential.

I can make shit stick to the roof like the exorcist in a laboratory with the Coulomb Force and a fluid via a phenomenon known as electromigration.

Does it apply only for shit? Is a fan necessary? I'd like to see you try.

You can take your gravity and shovel it Prof. Lizard Tits!

Now that's funny. Tongue
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 05, 2020, 09:56:46 AM
^^^ Can we learn how fractional distillation works?



I'm curious, what the school is on why different substances into separate layers?

Personally I think it's because of density, pressure and a source of electrons (-) from the extended plain that is the ground. **mic drop** God's firmament of heaven, the dome above us has a great electrical potential (+).

I can make shit stick to the roof like the exorcist in a laboratory with the Coulomb Force and a fluid via a phenomenon known as electromigration. You can take your gravity and shovel it Prof. Lizard Tits!
hero member
Activity: 1190
Merit: 755
Homo Sapiens Bitcoinerthalensis
January 05, 2020, 07:30:39 AM
Okaaay my thick skull friend, time to go to bed, you're tired. Tongue
In the morning we will reconsider if you should go back to school son.
legendary
Activity: 2212
Merit: 1038
January 05, 2020, 05:04:41 AM
The atmosphere is in layers separated by density, these layers form a stack of planes above the extended plain of the earth. The earth is covered by a mirrored nickel-iron composite steel dome with a positive (+) electric charge, the atmospheric planes as a result, form an area that takes the shape of a hemispheroid.

The very topmost layer is the lightest matter (so-called electrons), the next is hydrogen, then helium and so on. Energy is directed at these top layers. The Sun is a disc of plasma on the surface of the hydrogen layer and the Moon is on the surface of the helium layer. The stars and planets have their own layers too.

The plasma discs of the celestial objects are reflected by the mirrored steel dome, creating holograms we see from the surface of the earth.

As electrons and lighter gasses seek the positive charge of the dome they exert a force on the denser materials thus pushing them towards the ground (-) and forming the atmospheric layers.

Reality is in fact, radically different from the clap trap presented in the media and taught in schools.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
January 04, 2020, 02:40:22 PM
My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why we need a colony on moon when there are no oxygen and planting trees might be undiscovered to the unsources land? There are few things that need to be process by which you can't prove without any evidence by landing on the moon. But for now we have an advance technology, do you believe that there are no people who land on the moon already?

Oh, we might could use the helium3 on the moon for powering fusion reactors.
Might be very interesting to put powerful telescopes / radio telescopes on the far side. Or build a rocket propellant supply station there for solar system missions.
hero member
Activity: 2086
Merit: 501
★Bitvest.io★ Play Plinko or Invest!
January 04, 2020, 12:21:00 PM
My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why we need a colony on moon when there are no oxygen and planting trees might be undiscovered to the unsources land? There are few things that need to be process by which you can't prove without any evidence by landing on the moon. But for now we have an advance technology, do you believe that there are no people who land on the moon already?
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
January 02, 2020, 10:13:13 AM
My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.
If Columbus had gone to the West Indies and found nothing but a vacuum and barren rocks and craters, exploration would certainly have stopped.

We didn't find gold, women, and rum on our Moon...
newbie
Activity: 70
Merit: 0
January 01, 2020, 08:15:23 PM
My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.

Why? Why would we have a colony by now? Do you think that after going to the moon, each trip afterwards would be free?
legendary
Activity: 3906
Merit: 1373
December 31, 2019, 08:13:42 AM
...
The other thing, weight is a major issue why were no wheels with spokes used? ....
All I can guess at on that would be to absolutely minimize pounds per square inch loading where the tire meets the dirt. That would be contrary to power efficiency. Yes it would seem to be like driving with half flat tires.

They were paranoid about some places having soft fluffy dust that could bury people and machines. By Apollo 15 they had a lot of knowledge about the surface, but remember, each LEM touched down in a geologically different area. Although the surface dust turned out pretty much the same in hindsight.

There may have been other reasons.

But the real question is about landing on the moon. "Land" generally refers to ground or dirt on the earth. Where is the definition that moon-ground moon-dirt is land? If there is no such definition, then maybe we didn't land on the moon after all, even though we went there.

It's not that we can't individually make up our own definitions of words. When we do, our definition stands... even when others don't accept it. So, we could have landed on the moon. But where is the definition of "land" or "landed" that says it in a defined way?

Cool
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 30, 2019, 09:54:53 PM
...
The other thing, weight is a major issue why were no wheels with spokes used? ....
All I can guess at on that would be to absolutely minimize pounds per square inch loading where the tire meets the dirt. That would be contrary to power efficiency. Yes it would seem to be like driving with half flat tires.

They were paranoid about some places having soft fluffy dust that could bury people and machines. By Apollo 15 they had a lot of knowledge about the surface, but remember, each LEM touched down in a geologically different area. Although the surface dust turned out pretty much the same in hindsight.

There may have been other reasons.
hero member
Activity: 1106
Merit: 503
BabelFish - FISH Token Sale at Sovryn
December 30, 2019, 09:24:08 PM
My honest opinion on this would probably be NO. If humans had landed long back with those technologies then we would have a colony by now on Moon. World wanted to see who won the space race and US grabbed that opportunity by creating this.
legendary
Activity: 2926
Merit: 1386
December 30, 2019, 09:17:40 PM
Does anyone know what the urge was to pick up a rock 5 miles form base instead of just bend down and pick one up?...

Geology. Some very important rocks were literally picked up from the surface. All rocks are not the same.

In many ways, the Moon has not changed in billions of years. Sure, there's a couple of meters of dust on the top layer. But can we find some of the original rocks? What were they like? Eg the genesis rock.

Many of the rocks are breccia, sort of everything-compressed-and-fused together.

What would it mean to find little beads of orange glass?

How thick is the crust of the moon? Is there a molten core?  What causes the localized magnetic fields? Is there water? Was there water in the past?
sr. member
Activity: 1176
Merit: 297
Bitcoin © Maximalist
December 30, 2019, 11:05:11 AM
Does anyone know what the urge was to pick up a rock 5 miles form base instead of just bend down and pick one up?

The other thing, weight is a major issue why were no wheels with spokes used?
https://nssdc.gsfc.nasa.gov/planetary/image/as15_88_11901.jpg

The medal mesh getting pressed down to the inner frame is a power inefficient nightmare. It is even worse as driving with so little tire pressure to almost compress down to the rim. Each and every cross-section of the mesh chafes, what the hee hah?


Pages:
Jump to: