📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝 - page 5.

snipie

legendary

Activity: 3094

Merit: 1140

#SWGT CERTIK Audited

Quote from: pawel7777 on November 14, 2023, 02:33:51 PM

I wish we had more diverse industries advertising via signatures, which is currently dominated by casinos/mixers and maybe some exchanges.

In the past, I believe the number of signature campaign advertising for other stuff where more prevalent than the latest years. Even the most popular ones weren't about gambling theme but things changed with the Bitcoin price rising much, maybe with the first ATH in 2017? I don't recall with precision.
For the signature campaign reducing a lot the number of its participants, I think they didn't notice a lot of difference when they did it in the past so they reduced it even further. This might backfire since the popularity of the forums is undeniable. When I first join the crypto world I was very sceptic about every service until I got reassured about it with good feedbacks in Bitcointalk. The more you are visible here, the more people trust you.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: salad daging on November 14, 2023, 11:56:32 AM

I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

It's simple, they achieved a certain goal that they planned through the signature campaign. Now they will maintain their presence with something smaller.
We have seen it before with some other casinos like Bitsler, Crypto-games etc... After the initial aggressive campaign and strengthening of the brand, a smaller number of users is enough to maintain their presence on the forum.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2408

Merit: 1555

Quote from: salad daging on November 14, 2023, 11:56:32 AM

I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

Maybe they are simply testing whether there will be any significant impact of the massive cut in number of participants. If so, they might decide to increase the number again.
But honestly, it seems like the forum is already saturated with gambling-related signatures, especially the gambling section (due to the minimum posts requirements in that section), and it often looks like all the discussion there is just signature campaign posters trying to promote their sites to each other.

I wish we had more diverse industries advertising via signatures, which is currently dominated by casinos/mixers and maybe some exchanges.

salad daging

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 791

Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈

Quote from: Plaguedeath on November 14, 2023, 03:36:58 AM

Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.

I don't think so, there are still quite a lot of active gamblers on Roobet, maybe there is another reason why they reduced the budget to 10x Hero/Legendary which means their budget for campaigns is $700 per week.

My assumption is that Roobet's management might evaluate forum marketing or try other marketing it is still very possible, but believe that Roobet will not leave completely from the forum despite its reputation and large casino.

Potato Chips

hero member

Activity: 2674

Merit: 865

yesssir! 🫡

Quote from: Plaguedeath on November 14, 2023, 03:36:58 AM

Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.

I'm leaning towards there's no problem at all. and indeed, perhaps they'll be exploring other areas of marketing as well.

They have been running the campaign for a long time and have established a good standing hence it's not a long shot to think Roobet may have thought it's fine to ease up on signature campaign.

Plaguedeath

hero member

Activity: 672

Merit: 557

Bump.

There's a sad news in Roobet campaign where they shrink their participants from 36 users to 10 users, previously they removed 23 participants, so it means they've remove 49 users.

Is Roobet lost their active gamblers? so they don't make a lot money than it was and resulting reduction in signature campaign? or they just want to try other marketing strategy?

There's still a big traffic in their social medias and they still launch art contest for almost every month too.

salad daging

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 791

Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈

Quote from: LTU_btc on October 18, 2023, 12:51:30 PM

Oh, I just realized that I haven't saw their signatures for a while and that their previous campaign was closed. I agree with others that they barely can attract good posters with such low payment rates. Especially if you're in their lower tier. But where did you get that you can earn up to $40 week? I see that in tier A they pay 3500 Satoshi per post, it's almot $1 and if you will make 60 posts, you can earn $60.

But the manager will keep an eye out for low-quality posters and the manager had said so after the announcement of the accepted participants.

Tier A started with a rates of 2200 sat and has now been increased to 3500 sat.
That's much better than before.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1330

Slava Ukraini!

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.

Oh, I just realized that I haven't saw their signatures for a while and that their previous campaign was closed. I agree with others that they barely can attract good posters with such low payment rates. Especially if you're in their lower tier. But where did you get that you can earn up to $40 week? I see that in tier A they pay 3500 Satoshi per post, it's almot $1 and if you will make 60 posts, you can earn $60.
But allowing to make up to 60 posts, damn, it leads to spam. I don't see how someone can make so many quality posts in just 1 week, especially considering that most of these users probably weren't accepted into higher paying campaigns. And we should expect that users will try to reach max allowed quota to maximize their earnings.

Bitcoin_Arena

copper member

Activity: 2016

Merit: 1783

฿itcoin for all, All for ฿itcoin.

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.

Their money, their rules

But from what I can see they will most likely get applications from users who haven't been accepted in other campaigns such as
1. Accounts that have just woken up after long gaps without posting.
2. Low post quality users.
3. Users that are not so good with the English boards

Quote from: Little Mouse on October 17, 2023, 07:35:40 AM

Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.

In 2019, $50-$30 was normal pay for legendary ranks for most signature campaigns except for chipmixer and the likes, and there were very few live signature campaign during that bear market.
Today things are different, $70-$100 seems to be a common figure.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

Bitvest Plinko Signature Campaign is now open again.

Spamfest is starting again, it's time for the sleeping alt accounts to wake up. It's incredible that in a short time, we have about 7 pages (~140) of applications here

Quote from: salad daging on October 17, 2023, 11:09:43 AM

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.

Maybe they will plan for the long term again, so it's good that Bitvest is back active on the forum after being off for a long time.

It can be said that it will be a long-term campaign, given that the manager has enough funds for several months in escrow at the current payment rate.

Quote from: CryptopreneurBrainboss on October 16, 2023, 10:32:11 PM

Bitvest Escrow Address: bc1q00pyv4twqzj88525e2pfypf4m4d9kmpkgyqpje
Current balance:

salad daging

hero member

Activity: 1624

Merit: 791

Bitcoin To The Moon 📈📈📈

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

Bitvest Plinko Signature Campaign is now open again. The campaign is paying very little, even before its reopening, with no limit on the number of campaign participants. Member rank to Legendary can join. You can also post a maximum of 60 local posts since local posts are counted. However, even if you post the maximum of 60 your earnings will still be lower compared to other campaigns.

This signature campaign follows the old payout levels in 2018 with no changes at all but the owner may just want what he wants.

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

As of now, 2400 satoshis are only worth $0.68 according to CoinMarketCap, which means a Legendary rank can only earn $40 per week. In my opinion, it's a bargain signature campaign.

I don't know if in this campaign there are Legendary places? In some 'Tier' lists there is no mention of legendary except just heroes, I think it is impossible for managers to miss that rank. Maybe specifically Hero to Member.

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.

Maybe they will plan for the long term again, so it's good that Bitvest is back active on the forum after being off for a long time.

Jawhead999

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 1156

Quote from: Little Mouse on October 17, 2023, 07:35:40 AM

Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.

Because they deducted the payrate, it was 6,500 Satoshi + 500 Satoshi (bonus) for Hero tier A, so the maximum is 0.00397500 BTC/$110. If they use the old payrate, many good posters will try to join since it's still worth and long term.

But with the current payrate, I think they either only get spammer or AI poster.

Little Mouse

legendary

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1908

Marketing Campaign Manager |Telegram ID- @LT_Mouse

Quote from: xLays on October 17, 2023, 06:15:37 AM

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run?

Bitvest and 777coin signature campaign is one of the oldest campaigns. I have been a part of this campaign back in my early forum days. They used to pay this little amount at that time too. Well, $40 max pay for Legendary seems low though. If I'm correct, I used to get around $35 for 60 posts per week back in 2019/20.

xLays

sr. member

Activity: 1596

Merit: 358

https://shuffle.com?r=nba

Bitvest Plinko Signature Campaign is now open again. The campaign is paying very little, even before its reopening, with no limit on the number of campaign participants. Member rank to Legendary can join. You can also post a maximum of 60 local posts since local posts are counted. However, even if you post the maximum of 60 your earnings will still be lower compared to other campaigns.

As of now, 2400 satoshis are only worth $0.68 according to CoinMarketCap, which means a Legendary rank can only earn $40 per week. In my opinion, it's a bargain signature campaign.

What are your thoughts about this campaign in the long run? For sure, local boards will become active again.

AB de Royse777

legendary

Activity: 2464

Merit: 3878

Visit: r7promotions.com

Quote from: WEB503 on September 06, 2023, 06:32:33 PM

Quote from: examplens on September 06, 2023, 06:12:40 PM

I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.

Thank you for your advice. The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback and we don't like that in the campaign thread he also advertises his services. We spoke with the second one recently and he advised us to follow the trends of the forum, including current rates that will allow us to attract high-quality posters, so we will probably go with him.

That's what I received when Whirlwind management were very close to make a signature campaign deal with me :-D
They had this thought that the negative feedback left by JollyGood will effect their campaign so they decided to conduct it with someone else.

Anyway, icopress is also a good one to go with. Good luck.

dkbit98

legendary

Activity: 2212

Merit: 7064

Cashback 15%

Quote from: WEB503 on September 06, 2023, 06:32:33 PM

The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback

Don't just blindly look at negative feedback on member profiles, but look who wrote them.
One of members who gave him negative feedback should not be trusted, he has a long tradition of abusing trust system and he is part of my ignore list.

WEB503

copper member

Activity: 91

Merit: 30

Quote from: examplens on September 06, 2023, 06:12:40 PM

I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.

Thank you for your advice. The first guy you mentioned we probably won't connect with as he has negative feedback and we don't like that in the campaign thread he also advertises his services. We spoke with the second one recently and he advised us to follow the trends of the forum, including current rates that will allow us to attract high-quality posters, so we will probably go with him.

dragonvslinux

legendary

Activity: 1652

Merit: 2177

Crypto Swap Exchange

Quote from: dkbit98 on September 06, 2023, 06:03:05 PM

Quote from: WEB503 on September 06, 2023, 05:13:57 PM

Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.

Royse777, icopress and Hhampuz are all good managers and they are most active at the moment.
If you ask me what terms and conditions I would like to see in campaign, than I can say that I like to have freedom to write as I usually do, without limitations for minimum and/or maximum number of posts.
Long term campaign with reasonbale amount of escrowed funds would probably attract more quality members, but you can always offer members individual deals without involving third party Wink

Personally I like icopress' total earnt merit ranking styled spreadsheets, rather than focusing simply on merit earnt in past 120 days. I think the idea of bonus' for having 2K, 4K, 6K etc merit for certain rewards will become the new norm over time, as it's more about quality of posting rather than quantity for these types of campaigns. I noticed Royse777 has also started using merit-based reward system with 4K getting considerably more than Legendary/Hero ranks, which also makes sense when their are less than 50 users in that position, so hopefully others will follow suit.

ajiz138

hero member

Activity: 1470

Merit: 783

Quote from: WEB503 on September 06, 2023, 06:09:18 PM

Quote from: pawel7777 on September 06, 2023, 05:56:03 PM

I'm currently participating in a campaign managed by julers12, very solid and trusted guy who can provide all-round services including signature/avatar designs. His service advertisement topic: https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/service-signaturebounty-campaign-management-2522224

Thank you. As far as I can tell this person is careless with money, so we'd rather choose someone else.

You can make payments with you, just like Coinomize signatures, the owner himself makes payments every week with his wallet address included.

But choosing someone else may be a good solution to eliminate your doubts, but the names mentioned are the best managers today.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: WEB503 on September 06, 2023, 05:13:57 PM

Guys, since you're talking about signing campaigns, I would like to know what conditions are most acceptable for campaign participants? We would like to launch a campaign, but we are still thinking about which manager to choose and what campaign conditions will be most suitable for participants.

I don't think you should base only on the opinion of the campaign participants. There are only a few rules for them. Number of posts they can/should write, payment rate and limitation in which boards it is desirable to be present or not. The Signature campaign serves the owner in building and promoting the business, and the brand and adapts to it.
It is best to contact one of the managers (why not more of them) and ask for specific suggestions based on their experiences. I noticed that Royse777 and icopress do some kind of analytics and monitor the final effect of the campaigns, so I believe they already have some conclusions about it.

Topic: 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝 - page 5. (Read 4068 times)