📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 28, 2024, 06:07:08 PM

Any thoughts on that?
I understand the logic, but I wouldn't be surprised if other major campaigns also decided to switch to stablecoins (due to the unpredictability of BTC fees), in which case, either Mitchell would have to change the policy for his Overview thread, or we could need a new summary (perhaps in the Altcoins section) that includes all types of campaigns.

Strictly speaking, only one campaign is entirely a Bitcoin campaign. Where the payment rate is in Bitcoin and not in USD. The service section is much more "popular" than altcoin/bounty, so everyone wants to start there.
However, this is a Bitcointalk forum, BTC and altcoins should not be equated.

PX-Z

hero member

Activity: 1428

Merit: 836

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 28, 2024, 06:07:08 PM

I understand the logic, but I wouldn't be surprised if other major campaigns also decided to switch to stablecoins (due to the unpredictability of BTC fees)

So far the fees now are back in 20 sats/vB range but it go back to the way it used to be like in halving for some time (who knows when).

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 28, 2024, 06:07:08 PM

in which case, either Mitchell would have to change the policy for his Overview thread, or we could need a new summary (perhaps in the Altcoins section) that includes all types of campaigns.

It could be but this thread will not be belong here anymore, well if it's a mixed campaigns (alts and bitcoin list) i guess it's fine but i don't think it will be happening too soon.

logfiles

copper member

Activity: 1960

Merit: 1638

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 28, 2024, 06:07:08 PM

Any thoughts on that?

It's the right thing to do.

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 28, 2024, 06:07:08 PM

or we could need a new summary (perhaps in the Altcoins section) that includes all types of campaigns.

That lists already exists. Maybe it just needs to be updated

Signature campaigns paid in stable coins/ top altcoins like LTC

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Latest developments in the signature campaigns world:
Apparently Stake campaign has switched to USDT payments and consequently got moved to the Bounty board as well as removed from the Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns thread.

hilariousandco's (Global Mod) statement:

Quote from: hilariousandco on April 26, 2024, 03:31:10 AM

Quote from: LoyceV on April 26, 2024, 02:10:28 AM

Quote from: yahoo62278 on April 25, 2024, 12:42:56 PM

LoyceV posted something close but not anything saying you cannot post a campaign paying in altcoin.

I'm curious where you read that:

Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 01:27:51 PM

Services provided/demanded on-forum for Bitcoin.

It literally says it's for Bitcoin services, and I've reported many topics over the years saying "Non-Bitcoin service", after which they got moved (or deleted). There's no need to say it's not for altcoins, altcoins are not Bitcoin.

Correct. If it doesn't pay in bitcoin it belongs elsewhere just like if threads don't pay in some sort of crypto at all threads are trashed.

Any thoughts on that?
I understand the logic, but I wouldn't be surprised if other major campaigns also decided to switch to stablecoins (due to the unpredictability of BTC fees), in which case, either Mitchell would have to change the policy for his Overview thread, or we could need a new summary (perhaps in the Altcoins section) that includes all types of campaigns.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1330

Slava Ukraini!

Quote from: joker_josue on April 23, 2024, 08:02:33 PM

I believe this is unlikely to happen. Campaign managers would evaluate this type of situation before approving a new user for their campaign. And even if it was accepted in both, the subscription campaign manager would most likely reevaluate keeping that user in the campaign.

Yeah, I'm sure that campaign managers wouldn't let to advertise two competing business at the same time - you can't sit on 2 chairs at the same time.
But when probably 90% of campaigns is about gambling, it doesn't leaves many options to advertise something different.

joker_josue

legendary

Activity: 1638

Merit: 4508

**In BTC since 2013**

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 23, 2024, 05:44:33 PM

We could potentially end up in a weird situation when people could be advertising two competing businesses simultaneously, in the avatar and signature.

I believe this is unlikely to happen. Campaign managers would evaluate this type of situation before approving a new user for their campaign. And even if it was accepted in both, the subscription campaign manager would most likely reevaluate keeping that user in the campaign.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: examplens on April 23, 2024, 08:26:17 AM

In 2023, when mixer campaigns were at their peak, almost every mixer campaign had additional slots for avatar-only participants.
The campaigns of the manager who opened additional avatar slots are generally not exclusive to the mandatory use of an avatar, so in some cases, it is allowed to use a different avatar in relation to the signature.

RIP mixers Cry

They will be missed.

I think it's kind of grey area for many campaigns that are not explicitly asking participants to wear avatars, but they provide such so it could be assumed/implied that wearing them is a requirement.
We could potentially end up in a weird situation when people could be advertising two competing businesses simultaneously, in the avatar and signature.

examplens

legendary

Activity: 3248

Merit: 3098

Quote from: LTU_btc on April 22, 2024, 03:07:05 PM

Yes, I think it's first avatar campaign for very long time. In my early days here I remember there was more avatar campaigns, but can't say that it was big thing there.
$1 is great deal, probably you can't ask for something better, considering that's just image without clickable link. Not sure how many people will be interested in this offer, considering that most of campaigns already ask to wear their avatar.

In 2023, when mixer campaigns were at their peak, almost every mixer campaign had additional slots for avatar-only participants.
The campaigns of the manager who opened additional avatar slots are generally not exclusive to the mandatory use of an avatar, so in some cases, it is allowed to use a different avatar in relation to the signature.

PX-Z

hero member

Activity: 1428

Merit: 836

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: LTU_btc on April 22, 2024, 03:07:05 PM

Yes, I think it's first avatar campaign for very long time. In my early days here I remember there was more avatar campaigns, but can't say that it was big thing there.
$1 is great deal, probably you can't ask for something better, considering that's just image without clickable link.

Way back before, campaigns are mostly for signature campaigns, and avatar campaigns are separate, that's why most participants have different signature and avatar.

Avatar campaigns usually has fixed rate like $15-25 per week, so $1 per post is a huge improvement for payment rate if you can post more than 25. Somewhat after the 2017 bullrun, campaign era changes and from btc fixed per post or per week, becomes dollar rates.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Quote from: LTU_btc on April 22, 2024, 03:07:05 PM

Yes, I think it's first avatar campaign for very long time. In my early days here I remember there was more avatar campaigns, but can't say that it was big thing there.
$1 is great deal, probably you can't ask for something better, considering that's just image without clickable link. Not sure how many people will be interested in this offer, considering that most of campaigns already ask to wear their avatar.

They already have like three dozen applicants, but I sense a big portion of them just put their names down after seeing the topic updated to [open] and likely not realising it's just an avatar campaign.
But there are always a lot of people who are not enrolled in any campaign and they'd be happy to take whatever there's available at the moment.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1330

Slava Ukraini!

Quote from: pawel7777 on April 22, 2024, 01:24:21 PM

Looks like avatar-only campaigns are back on the menu:

Quote from: icopress on April 22, 2024, 10:56:56 AM

We have 10 avatar slots open - $1 per post / Payments for 35 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 66,350]}

I don't think we've seen them in a long while (or maybe I was just unaware of that).
$1 per post sounds like pretty decent rate, given avatars do not even include clickable links and are more about building brand recognition than generating new sign ups.

Yes, I think it's first avatar campaign for very long time. In my early days here I remember there was more avatar campaigns, but can't say that it was big thing there.
$1 is great deal, probably you can't ask for something better, considering that's just image without clickable link. Not sure how many people will be interested in this offer, considering that most of campaigns already ask to wear their avatar.

pawel7777

legendary

Activity: 2436

Merit: 1561

Looks like avatar-only campaigns are back on the menu:

Quote from: icopress on April 22, 2024, 10:56:56 AM

We have 10 avatar slots open - $1 per post / Payments for 35 week are on their way. ^{[Exchange rate: 66,350]}

I don't think we've seen them in a long while (or maybe I was just unaware of that).
$1 per post sounds like pretty decent rate, given avatars do not even include clickable links and are more about building brand recognition than generating new sign ups.

NotATether

legendary

Activity: 1568

Merit: 6660

bitcoincleanup.com / bitmixlist.org

Quote from: Solosanz on March 17, 2024, 02:01:37 AM

I see, even licking boobs is also fine. Tongue

That's how it's been for at least 10 years.

PS. The NSFW rule only applies to the forum content, not to whatever website is being advertised.

TheUltraElite

legendary

Activity: 2828

Merit: 1213

Call your grandparents and tell them you love them

Quote from: snipie on March 16, 2024, 10:22:04 AM

I don't know if my memories recall something similar or confuse it with a project that I saw talk about it here years ago. Not sure, I have some flashback about Bitcointalk, theymos, reddit, nsfw, 2015-2016...then 2020-2021? a banned user presumably a lady that promoted something similar? If someone recall these or could fix it if I am mistaken?
Anyway, since these projects are legal in the country of origin and not against the forums rule, I suppose it will not be a problem, for the moment at least.

The manager aTriz suffered the consequences of some scammer called Alia. aTriz was ruined by that and it destroyed their career, however this signature campaign is not even remotely same as that. He vouched for a gambling script and things went down the rabbit hole after that.

Over here, people who may have beliefs against such services, might not want to join, but again this is a personal choice just like promoting a casino and making money from that or getting trapped in your own beliefs and not being able to make money.

Solosanz

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 556

Quote from: Potato Chips on March 16, 2024, 04:51:47 PM

It should be fine since Theymos gave an OK to bigbitmine's avatar which IMO is more suggestive, see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bigbitmine-358121

Quote from: theymos on April 06, 2015, 04:02:43 PM

bigbitmine and El Emperador's avatars are fine IMO.

I see, even licking boobs is also fine. Tongue

Potato Chips

hero member

Activity: 2674

Merit: 865

yesssir! 🫡

Quote from: Solosanz on March 16, 2024, 10:10:36 AM

I'm not sure how the forum judge NSFW images, probably it's still fine since it just a lady that wear panties? not full naked or have a sex activity.

It should be fine since Theymos gave an OK to bigbitmine's avatar which IMO is more suggestive, see: https://bitcointalksearch.org/user/bigbitmine-358121

Quote from: theymos on April 06, 2015, 04:02:43 PM

bigbitmine and El Emperador's avatars are fine IMO.

LTU_btc

legendary

Activity: 3038

Merit: 1330

Slava Ukraini!

Quote from: Solosanz on March 16, 2024, 10:10:36 AM

There's a new campaign comes up [OPEN] Ladies.de | Top Content from Real German Escorts | Sig Campaign | Sr.+

I never imagine that there would be this kind project want to be promoted in this forum and willing to pay with Bitcoin LOL, this is mind blowing.

I'm not sure how the forum judge NSFW images, probably it's still fine since it just a lady that wear panties? not full naked or have a sex activity.

Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 01:27:51 PM

10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.

Maybe I'm confusing something, but I think that long time ago we had campaign that promoted some kind of NSFW website. But lazy to make research now and it's possible that I confused something.
Anyway, interesting to see something new on Bitcointalk because recently probably 90% of campaigns were promoting gambling websites. I don't see nothing what can go against Bitcointalk rules here. There is no NSFW content in signature, only link leads to NSFW website. And after all, they're not promoting porn or something what would be illegal.
Though, I think we can have users who would be against to join this campaign because of their views and beliefs, same like we have with gambling campaigns.

PX-Z

hero member

Activity: 1428

Merit: 836

Top Crypto Casino

Quote from: pawel7777 on March 16, 2024, 07:17:39 AM

That's the part of information a lot of managers seem to be neglecting and are potentially (unnecessarily) exposing themselves to a negative trust rating.

It's not only a potential of having negative trusts or -ve reputation but financially concerning to as some managers do compensate their participants from their own pocket.

Quote from: Solosanz on March 16, 2024, 10:10:36 AM

I'm not sure how the forum judge NSFW images, probably it's still fine since it just a lady that wear panties? not full naked or have a sex activity.

I research about this on the internet, it looks like a woman in bikini as nsfw is subjected and most are opinionated. Some says it depends on what kind of bikini a woman wear like if its too showy. But many says it's only nsfw if its nude, adult content and p*rn. On this campaign i feel like it's okay.

snipie

legendary

Activity: 3094

Merit: 1140

#SWGT CERTIK Audited

Quote from: Solosanz on March 16, 2024, 10:10:36 AM

-snip-

I don't know if my memories recall something similar or confuse it with a project that I saw talk about it here years ago. Not sure, I have some flashback about Bitcointalk, theymos, reddit, nsfw, 2015-2016...then 2020-2021? a banned user presumably a lady that promoted something similar? If someone recall these or could fix it if I am mistaken?
Anyway, since these projects are legal in the country of origin and not against the forums rule, I suppose it will not be a problem, for the moment at least.

Solosanz

hero member

Activity: 770

Merit: 556

There's a new campaign comes up [OPEN] Ladies.de | Top Content from Real German Escorts | Sig Campaign | Sr.+

I never imagine that there would be this kind project want to be promoted in this forum and willing to pay with Bitcoin LOL, this is mind blowing.

I'm not sure how the forum judge NSFW images, probably it's still fine since it just a lady that wear panties? not full naked or have a sex activity.

Quote from: mprep on July 21, 2014, 01:27:51 PM

10. No embedded NSFW images anywhere. NSFW content must be marked accordingly.

Topic: 📝[Discussion topic] Overview of Bitcointalk Signature-Ad Campaigns📝 (Read 4137 times)