Topic: Do you believe in ICO Ratings? - page 28. (Read 6947 times)
I believed on it's rating even I just participate a scam ICO bit still there are a good one's that will gives you a better profit just be careful and researched of the ICO you will participate to earn good profit. It also gives me a additional knowledge of the currency that I need to know just like other currency that are going to lead this era.
People often see that they are actually checking the real ico ratings as one of their referrals which are most selective to investors, but for me ico rating is one is just a guide and I'm not really believe in how quickly they rate some icos. But that would still depend on the willing investors how they would believe in this ICO rating.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I recommend that you do not pay attention to these sites. They are not particularly important now. Ratings can be wound artificial bots or custom work. I believe that it is necessary to look at the product itself the company. Is there currently a beta version of the site or app, depending on the product ... And these ratings are all " dust in the eyes "
I do not believe in ico rating mostly. I use them to know more about icos and their own ratings before i set out to make my own research. I use sites like icodrops to make the analysis and to see their ratings. This enables me to come to a conclusion and invest wisely
Not at all. Ico ratings is just a way for some people to help us to know about the ico, i believe its use for marketing purpose ti spread awareness rather than to gain trust, for the start ico ratings not from a legal institution or trusted one, they just a paid team by the ico team. So i dont think we should trust the ico ratings at all.
not anything is 100% proper there maximum ratings is probably wrong or might not cross as deliberate. a few ICOs can be rated very excessive and but on the end of the tokensale event, there won't be listed on any fundamental trade or they may not yield any income.
I really do not believe in these ratings, but I'm looking at the icobench. Recently it seems to me that everything is bought
Yes i believe but still there are some web sites where advisors are giving rating to the ICOs so still you need to do research comprehensively and check on different places .
Its your hard earned money and you dont want to throw it to the scammers
Its your hard earned money and you dont want to throw it to the scammers
at the moment I am looking for a good ICO also by looking at the rating because if it has a good rating then it means many people who believe with the ICO project so I will also choose to join
ICO rating did not fully provide an objective assessment regarding the ICO. many of the ICO ratings even has a wrong assessment in the rating gives the ICO. many could be seen ICO scam also has a great value. of course, it could be said that the ICO rating cannot guarantee the success of ICO.
Ico raitings are not so bad, first of all they can filter total scam, so you dont need to look at garbage, secondly there is some nice options like KYC for team.
ICO ratings aren't true.
Someone advertises ICO making a share on Facebook, and someone advertises on their rating site and also gets money for it. Call it a "rating bounty campaign"
Someone advertises ICO making a share on Facebook, and someone advertises on their rating site and also gets money for it. Call it a "rating bounty campaign"
Yes, I believe in the existence of ICO ratings. In my opinion, ICO branches help us in assessing the quality of ICO we have been following. An ICO will be said to succeed if in the rating that he has a high value and also the achievement of sales in accordance with the target or even exceeds the minimum expected target. ICO ratings also help us in seeing the prospect of ICO that we follow, ICO which has a good prospect in the future is ICO who meet all the above qualifications.
I think a website like ICObench, ICOrating only as one of the reference factors when we will invest on a project. But we also should not be too trust in these websites. The best result is when we do our own research on the project that we will invest.
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
So the ico rating website is just one of our references when we going to do deeper research on a project. That's my opinion. Btw sorry for my bad english and thanks!
ICO rating is just only for reference, it's good idea I think for me we should have established our own criteria in proper selection of good ICO. Team members, managers, platforms and the most important is the working product itself.
I never tried but maybe rating might be helpful so that we can find the project is real, the team, project scope, future plan are clear and it is not a scam which steels your money and suddenly disappear.
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I believe that these ratings were based on research and that the accuracy of the results are credible to a point that we can actually consider relying on them when it comes to choosing a project to invest in. Ratings may not be a 100% accurate, but at least we have something to check into when laying out our options. Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
I see many Websites that provide ratings for ongoing ICOs or for the future. Examples such as the ICObench.com Website, ICOrating.com and others.
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Which is my question whether you believe in the rating provided by the website. Seeing many ICO's do not match what they value. Many ICOs are arguably good ratings but when the token sales of the project only reach softcap. And there are projects that I see have a fairly mediocre rating but their token sales reach hardcap. I took the example of Lalaworld on ICObench.com they get Rating 3.7 but their token is sold out.
So let's discuss ICO Rating!
Ico ratings are nothing because the growth of the coin in the market of an ico is depending on the developers job on how good they can market their own altcoins.
I believe Ico rating web sites to a certain extent the reason is Some of their ratings are not exactly be done .. Most of them are not honest and the ratings are not fair .. so it's better to do your own research as well
I am not trusting 100% with ICO ratings but for me, ICO ratings will be one of the way to decide that the ICO that held scam or not. Because in ICO ratings have some review about the ICO and most of ICO that listing in the ICO ratings aren't scam. But not all the project which is listing in the ICO ratings can trust because before join in the ICO we must learn and know about everything in the project.
I think it's good to read other opinions and reviews, but anyway it's important to do your own research before investing money.
But it's definitely no good to read an opinion that's too subjective and literally can be considered advertisement than a review because they are giving a rating for money so it's really useless for us who really want to find a quality review, those kind of ICO rating is what I hate the most. Jump to: