what the investor feels if the money they invest by taking risks directly distributed to bounty participants.
50% eth 50% token just make hassle when distributed with a lot of participants
Topic: Do you support direct payment in ETH for bounty? (POLL) - page 11. (Read 2657 times)
The best thing would be to give half of the bounties in ETH and half in the own issued tokens. This way perhaps the bounty hunters would not run to dump their tokens immediately.
Bounties are generally in place to help raise funds for prospective coins so that they can develop and then market secure, stable, working product.
When a bounty campaign begins the project generally has little to no funding. What the developers do have are tokens which hopefully will be worth something someday. They can't offer ETH because they don't know if and how much ETH will be raised but they can offer their tokens.
This is very similar to traditional startups who offer equity to initial employees.
Now later, either after raising money or the coin gains, they obviously can and do fund development in other ways. By this time the bounty campaigns are generally long over.
Ask yourself: would you rather be offered tokens which may end up worth a lot or a little or told "we may or may not give you ETH for your work depending on whether we raise enough or not"?
When a bounty campaign begins the project generally has little to no funding. What the developers do have are tokens which hopefully will be worth something someday. They can't offer ETH because they don't know if and how much ETH will be raised but they can offer their tokens.
This is very similar to traditional startups who offer equity to initial employees.
Now later, either after raising money or the coin gains, they obviously can and do fund development in other ways. By this time the bounty campaigns are generally long over.
Ask yourself: would you rather be offered tokens which may end up worth a lot or a little or told "we may or may not give you ETH for your work depending on whether we raise enough or not"?
I vote No. Developers have the intention to have their token made known and be circulated for it to gain traction. They will still be able to get a lot of bounty participants even if they don't pay on eth. 50 - 50 is more of an advantage to the bounty campaigners i guess.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
p.s. If you know similar examples, share please in the comments
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
p.s. If you know similar examples, share please in the comments
You are absolutely right. I couldn't agree more. Payments should be 50/50. Half etherium, and half of the token they are promoting or lesser. I don't know, but as long as it has etherium it will be great. Because this ensures value for the people who work for the project. At least if the price doesn't go up, the participants still receive the amount of etherium that they deserve.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I think it would be great to pay in ETH for all the project that do bounty campaigns. A lot of investors are scared about good bounty payout and a huge dump after the ICO!
Payment with their token or coin is the best but the only negative effect of that is the hunter dumping their tokens or coins. Though not only hunter does that many ico participants also dump their bonus. I prefer payment in their token in full.
If direct payment in ethereum for bounty it is not good for new altcoin. Because everyone get eth so they do not use new token or coin . 
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
For me it is much better to pay in token than direct eth, it is because there is a big instances that the token can multiply the value more than 5x than to be pay at eth at once.
if in my opinion if the token and eth price is very far is not fair if such a process is done because it can harm half of the work of the participants bounty.sebab eth very much berberbeda with the price of the tokens.
that's my view.
that's my view.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
This is good but it is impossible to happen because the ICO are promoting their own altcoin too in which they should promote their token more in order for them to be known that is why some ICO are giving their token for free in we called this air drops. They are using the ethereum but limited to platform only so that investors could easily trade at the cheaper price.
Thanks for your opinion. You know, a few bounty campaign examples of 50\50 already exist, probably the founders of these projects found this solution beneficial. Likely that this approach may be even more effective influence on the promotion of the token.
Payment with their token or coin is the best but the only negative effect of that is the hunter dumping their tokens or coins. Though not only hunter does that many ico participants also dump their bonus. I prefer payment in their token in full.
I would rather choose ETH if I see that the project is not going to be that profitable in the near future. You don't hold tokens for more than a year thats absurd. Lol
But if I can see profitability in a year or less why not hold half tokens and receive eth?
But if I can see profitability in a year or less why not hold half tokens and receive eth?
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I think that bounty campaigns paying ETH directly is nice, but I think paying 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens is better. It will be convenient not only for the bounty participants but also to the developer as well. It will benefit developers since the dump that will be caused by bounty participants would be lessened and at the same time, bounty participants does not need to worry about fees when transferring to and from ETH wallet to exchange. Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
This is good but it is impossible to happen because the ICO are promoting their own altcoin too in which they should promote their token more in order for them to be known that is why some ICO are giving their token for free in we called this air drops. They are using the ethereum but limited to platform only so that investors could easily trade at the cheaper price.
I found today one project that provides the option of choosing bounty payment in ETH or tokens. But somehow it seemed incomprehensible to me. The bounty program doesn't specify how much and for what participants will receive payment. Just stated that you can do and send links through their system and the AI will count. I don't know if this is true, but the project raised 15000 ETH on pre-ICO. Here's a link https://bitcointalksearch.org/topic/bountystexexchange-1-st-exchange-30-aggregatorunique-bountypartner-prog-2069043
I fully support the vote here for that. that generosity for participation in campaigns ICO was paid in an etherium or at least half an etherium, and half-issued tokens. True, the ICO team will not support, I think this innovation, it is clearly not profitable for them. Signatures participating in campaigns, for example, receive their tokens after they have already been paid to investors and are in full swing on the stock exchange and have already fallen significantly in price. Therefore, in fact, they have to settle for their course already several times lower, and most of the coins never rise in price.
Quote
Therefore, in fact, they have to settle for their course already several times lower, and most of the coins never rise in price.
But at the same time, project founders successfully use raised ETH, and those who helped them to get it are left with their precious coins. It should not be. And first of all, really good and far-reaching projects should support this. Option 50/50 is the most mutually beneficial and rational, at my discretion.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I will like to receive payment for my bounty promoting in etherrum more than token. I am having problems converting my token to ethereum as I am new in how token work. I will prefer to get every payment for my token in ethereum since it is easy for me to convert my ethereum to bitcoin and fiat. Ethereum also have stable price than others tokens were price get dumped after listed on exchangers. Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
According to the growing Bitcoin price, projects can even double their profit if they need some month after ICO to release their products. If you invest in Bitcoin and wait a long period, it's doubtful that you can get profit. ETH is more stable, but it can also change.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I agree with 50% Ether and 50% in tokens, some of the tokens that participant earn from bounty campaigns end up decreasing in value once they hit the market, this means that participants won't be benefiting for the hard work in promoting the project during its ICO stage. Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
As long as everyone is ok with that im good,
but as others say it will be decided by the admins who manage the bounty payment
besides we can't argue with them because they are the one who made the payments
and also if they are comportable with they way they do payment im ok with that
because if we change it they will have hard times starting over the process they are
already familliar with , so let the admin who manage the bounty payments its not us
to argue with the admin lets just support them
but as others say it will be decided by the admins who manage the bounty payment
besides we can't argue with them because they are the one who made the payments
and also if they are comportable with they way they do payment im ok with that
because if we change it they will have hard times starting over the process they are
already familliar with , so let the admin who manage the bounty payments its not us
to argue with the admin lets just support them
Jump to: