I think paying in Ethereum makes sense as they can avoid the rush of token sales after the bounty payouts which normally lowers the price.
I have at times though opted for the project tokens instead of Ethereum when I have had the choice as I believe they will be worth more in the long run.
Topic: Do you support direct payment in ETH for bounty? (POLL) - page 12. (Read 2657 times)
If there is an option then I am ready to accept them in ETH because some companies are paying shit altcoin which is not going to use in the longer run. So If companies ready to pay us in ETH for promoting their campaign then we are ready to set go for it.
I fully support the vote here for that. that generosity for participation in campaigns ICO was paid in an etherium or at least half an etherium, and half-issued tokens. True, the ICO team will not support, I think this innovation, it is clearly not profitable for them. Signatures participating in campaigns, for example, receive their tokens after they have already been paid to investors and are in full swing on the stock exchange and have already fallen significantly in price. Therefore, in fact, they have to settle for their course already several times lower, and most of the coins never rise in price.
You will never be paid in the ethereum because they are not profitable for it and it is 100 percent
That's very selfish.You do know that the ICO's that get over millions of dollars put into it was promoted by those bounty hunters right? They should get paid.
For me honestly it is good to receive eth for bounty payments because base on my experiences in bounty campaign i have not yet sold a token that is base on its ICO price after it is listed in exchange unlike if you receive eth it is more stable and has more tendency to go up unlike in newly listed altcoins.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50 to 50?
My vote is no because if project become big your tokens might worth much more then few dollars worth ETH.Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50 to 50?
If not you will be holder of worthless tokens which happened to me
It is actually double edged sword.
Why not 50 to 50 in such cases?
Especially the market of altcoin was not strong like eth.
A qualitative bounty campaign with increased requirements to participants and payment in ETH (or 50\50) by a quality and promising project on the contrary will reduce the risks of investors.
not necessarily, since being paid by using a token is a worthwhile result because they have been promoting their tokens not ethereum.I agree. Probably I should write instead "on the contrary" the word "most likely"
Don't you think that the option 50/50 is really the most mutually beneficial, in such cases? In my opinion it is not possible to make payment with eth for 99% of icos. Because they mostly do not have enough money so they open a crowdfund. So they mostly do not have enough ethereum to send to bounty participants.
Thanks for your opinion, but probably you didn't quite understand my proposal. I mean the payment in ETH after the ICO, if, of course, the project has reached its goal.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
In my opinion support direct payment in etherum for bounty Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
Sometimes when you compare what was raised on ICO
and what was given to the marketing force of the ICO a.k.a Bounty hunters, you wonder if bounty hunter were deliberately been hunted! There is a lots of rip off going on with regards to payment.
If an ICO were to pay an advertisement fee on Google facebook etc.
A qualitative bounty campaign with increased requirements to participants and payment in ETH (or 50\50) by a quality and promising project on the contrary will reduce the risks of investors.
not necessarily, since being paid by using a token is a worthwhile result because they have been promoting their tokens not ethereum. i am not ok for paying bounty hunters with eth because it's investors money!
as investors take risk by investing their money, bounty hunters must take risk and be paid with tokens!
as bounty hunter, i do my own research before participating!
as investors take risk by investing their money, bounty hunters must take risk and be paid with tokens!
as bounty hunter, i do my own research before participating!
Thanks for your opinion, but please, don't put in a single row of investment and promotion\development. Projects always indicate in their whitepapers how they will use the raised investments. And usually, as a rule, an essential part for marketing. So the "bounty" is marketing (in its main part). Crowd marketing. And "bounty" is not exactly the right word for this.
A qualitative bounty campaign with increased requirements to participants and payment in ETH (or 50\50) by a quality and promising project on the contrary will reduce the risks of investors.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I think it is just justifiable to pay their participants in ETH if they are raising funds using ETH anyway and it will also lessen the dumpers after their token gets listed on exchanges. It will also be nice for bounty campaigns to have an escrow if they are going to pay in ETH, others don't pay their participants when they don't reach their minimum goal which is quite unfair for bounty campaign participants who did their nest advertising the failed projects for weeks. Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
this a best way to think... if paid eth for hard work.. it would be more worthy..
I am sure that in the campaigns of ICO, when paying the bounty, they are paid either by the etherium, or half by the etherium, but by half-released tokens, or by some other acceptable options at the discretion of the participant in the campaign of generosity. In many cases, for a generous period, investors have, as a rule, dropped a significant portion of these tokens on the exchange, which leads to a decrease in the rate of almost a dozen times and tokens remain very cheap.
Sometimes when you compare what was raised on ICO and what was given to the marketing force of the ICO a.k.a Bounty hunters, you wonder if bounty hunter were deliberately been hunted! There is a lots of rip off going on with regards to payment. If an ICO were to pay an advertisement fee on Google facebook etc. they will be coughing out a lots of dollars! Bounty should be paid in ether going foward!
The decision should be taken from the users themselves. There should be 3 options form the user could select any one option. Getting the payment in only ETH, only tokens and both 50 - 50. This could benefit the users and the ICOs in a positive way since the flexibility in payments would drive many users to be a part of it and the managers could be then more selective towards the participation of users. If I were to organize a campaign then I would definitely implement this option. The campaign I work for has a similar option to buy back the tokens distributed. LiveTree managed by Sylon has the option where users could sell 50% of their earnings in exchange for ETH. Definitely a great idea.
Your offer is perfect! Must be the right to choose. And I completely agree with you that this is useful both for projects and for supporters and for the ecosystem as a whole.
p.s. Thanks for the example, I will definitely get acquainted with this project.
I'll search for this LiveTree bounty, thanks for sharing
I'm fine Ether will pay us the bounties here in the forum. Because of the very high level of Bitcoins and its price is not stable then its prices may differ. It is also a good idea to pay our ether because it is now stable in price. And the ether will rise and of course the price will increase because many people will use it
I've noticed some bounty campaigns are paying in BTC or ETH in addition to their tokens, but is it sometimes reserved for Hero/Legendary members. I really like the idea.
Hey, guys.
Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
I'd rather agree with gift payments using 50% ETH and 50% token. but in my opinion the way is very complicated and not simple.Projects raise millions of dollars in ETH. Participants of the bounty campaigns significantly help them to do this.
Would it be fair if the participants will receive ETH for their work? Or 50% in ETH and 50% in tokens?
The easiest way is a payment using a token so that as a campaign participant feels the token he supports.
The decision should be taken from the users themselves. There should be 3 options form the user could select any one option. Getting the payment in only ETH, only tokens and both 50 - 50. This could benefit the users and the ICOs in a positive way since the flexibility in payments would drive many users to be a part of it and the managers could be then more selective towards the participation of users. If I were to organize a campaign then I would definitely implement this option. The campaign I work for has a similar option to buy back the tokens distributed. LiveTree managed by Sylon has the option where users could sell 50% of their earnings in exchange for ETH. Definitely a great idea.
That's a great route to entice more people to participate in bounties. I think this would be extremely viable for ICOs to do. Awesome post, I hope some devs can see this.
Jump to: